Tiborreich

Tibor Reich

I posted a reply to your question at Talk:Tibor Reich. But I am repeating it here because I am concerned that the article will be speedily deleted--and the talk page with it: —teb728 t c 00:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

To begin with, I notice that you say “inform us” rather than “inform me.” Who do you mean by “us”? Is there more than one person using your account? That is not permitted. Or are you editing on behalf of someone else? That is not permitted either. I notice also that you are using “Tiborriech” as a username. That strongly suggests that you are either editing on behalf of the Tibor Reich estate or pretending to do so—neither of which is permitted.

The fact that you use Tiborreich as a username suggests that you have a strong conflict of interest with regard to Reich. And the fact that you are unable to recognize how blatantly promotional your writing is confirms that suspicion. So basically the answer to your question is that because of your conflict of interest there is no way for you (plural) to create a neutral article.

The few sentences that you removed were just the tip of the iceberg; the article needs to be rewritten completely. In light of your conflict of interest it is really pointless, but let me point out a few of the most egregious problems: Your writing is full of peacock terminology. A few examples in the first few lines: “pioneering,” “made its name,” “cutting-edge,” “key.” Of course the real problem with those lines is that you copied them verbatim from http://www.tiborreichtrust.org/overview--tibor-reich-trust.html. And much of the rest of the article is copied verbatim from other pages on the Tibor Reich Trust website. Although it is the purpose of the Trust to be promotional, it is the purpose of Wikipedia to be neutral; so even if copyright problems could be resolved the Trust’s material is inappropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Tibor Reich appears to notable enough for an article. So I hope that someone will write an article about him before the article is deleted as promotional and/or a copyright violation. —teb728 t c 00:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)