User talk:Theopolisme/Archive 10

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

→

Archive 15

Isla Aves

The basis of the current rapport between Venezuela and Dominica is that the Dominicans concede Venezuelan ownership of Isla Aves. However the Dominicans do not concede that the boundary extends into the area of Dominican offshore claims beside the twelve mile area associated with a rock. The Dominicans receive aid from Venezuela and also maintain a fishing fleet which would be restricted if they could only fish out seventy miles.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.202.36 (talk) 13:46, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, 66 - I assume you are talking about this edit - am I correct? If so, could you please cite a reliable source in your addition? Otherwise, it's not verifiable. Thanks, and happy editing! Please let me know if you have any other questions. Theopolisme 16:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Regarding User:192.12.88.147

I saw the message you left on User talk:192.12.88.147 prior to logging in. I'm logging in from a computer connected to the WiFi at Rutgers–Camden, specifically its graduate housing dormitory, so this is probably a shared IP. I'm not entirely sure what procedure is to tag an IP as a shared one, though. Lockesdonkey (talk) 22:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse invite for already-indeffed user?

You left one here: User talk:Bhim chauhan. It just seemed strange so I thought I'd mention it. If it's not strange, then I'm sorry for the intrusion.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Alf - take a look at the diff. It was actually just the Teahouse bot using my name (it cycles through them). It's a bit odd how it invited an indeffed user, tho. I'm on mobile now, or else I would do it, but perhaps bring it up at wt:TH? Thanks! Theopolisme 00:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Got it. I thought it might be some kind of automated process gone awry, but it didn't occur to me to look at the diff. I will certainly mention it over there. Thanks!— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 01:30, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

mentoring

FYI. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Viking Moses

Hello Theopolisme. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Viking Moses, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article has been edited since it was tagged and is no longer a copyvio. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know (albeit with an automated tool, but I won't judge), Malik. I probably should have removed it myself, but forgot to watchlist it. Theopolisme 11:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

personal analysis

Hellow. what did you fin unconstructive in my article added ti mulkanadu bramhins? I have exposed a sage like person serving for society silently to pull the attantion of world towards him. If you feel that the article was unhealthy, what shall i say? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RAMAN RAMAN HOSUR (talk • contribs) 07:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Raman -- I removed your contributions because they involved adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, which goes against the Wikipedia neutral point of view policy. Please let me know if you need any more help! Cheers, Theopolisme 11:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

• From the editor: Signpost expands to Facebook

• WikiProject report: Action! — The Indian Cinema Task Force

• Featured content: Go into the light

• News and notes: Tens of thousands of monuments loved; members of new funding body announced

• Technology report: Future-proofing: HTML5 and IPv6

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 17:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Clare Perkins

Hi, I made the changes to the Claire Perkins page because I am Clare Perkins, firstly my name is spelt wrong, the info about how long I have been acting is wrong and lastly my daughter's name appears on the page, this is unacceptable as she is not in the public domain , what reliable source would you like? the information is about ME and it is wrong that is why I changed it, why is there no information on who started this page? the only source they quote is the magazine with the info about my new job, there is no source for the other material WHICH IS WRONG. (My daughter has special needs/learning difficulties and I do not want her name on the page, it is enough to mention that I have a daughter)

I only created an account to change the information , more info about my acting work or to verify can be found at my agents website Natasha Stevenson Management, casting callpro , spotlight or IMDB, sorry if I was supposed to leave this message somewhere else but i just wanted the information about me to be accurate.

Thanks,

Clare Perkins — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waterfromthesky (talk • contribs) 20:22, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Clare, thanks for letting me know! While I've fixed the issues involving the spelling of your name (as the source includes this), I'm afraid that I may not be able to assist with some of your other concerns. Firstly, as I'm sure you're away, IMDb can be edited by anyone. This means that it's not technically a reliable source for adding your filmography - does the production company have a website? Are there any press releases which state you were in the films? These are examples of good sources. Next, your daughter: if you have concerns about her inclusion in the article, these are the steps you should follow. I hope I've answered your questions - please let me know if you have any more! Theopolisme 20:38, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

greg kinear

ya you were right about greg kinear I tried telling my brother he wasnt in that movie but he would'nt listen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.27.65.176 (talk) 21:30, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

If that really is the case, then I'm quite glad. To avoid further confusion with your brother, you may want to consider creating an account. Happy editing! Theopolisme 21:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

CVUA

Some serious suggestions for a total overhaul are now being made. In anticipation of the possible implementation of these changes, some things that could immediately help reduce the bureaucracy, would be to reduce the banter and the use of 'clerking' style micro templates. I have proposed one solution that puts the entire CVU 'school' on one single page, placing responsibility for project management at the hands of the 'active' trainers themselves, obviating any forms of secondary discussion. An updated draft is available at here. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:51, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

I like your new concept -- a few rough edges here and there, but I think they can be addressed quickly enough. Theopolisme 11:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

No specifics are required to prove who asks for training. I can assure you that at least one candidate for training was a PhD and senior faculty member. Please remember that anyone can ask for training - you never can be sure whom you are talking to on the Internet, and no one on Wikipedia is required to disclose who they are.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I'll take your word for it -- no reason to doubt you -- and I believe I see your goal with it -- to get trainers to realize this is, to put it mildly, "serious business." Apologies, Theopolisme 20:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Creation of Template talk:Db-redirnonebot

I'm not too sure why you created this page with {{db-meta}}. Is there a reason that the talk page should have it? Thanks, LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 20:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

What on earth? I was making a revision to {{db-meta}} (just a minor wikilink) - how on earth was it saved to the talk page? Theopolisme 20:54, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Upon reflection, I've seen this issue occur several times - and - get this - only when I'm trying to edit a page with a CSD template on it. I didn't form the connection until now, but -- Bugzilla? Theopolisme 20:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I have also seen this, when trying to tag a page with {{db-promo}}. The issue always occurs when a speedy deletion template is involved. Noom (t) 21:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

So I'm not going crazy... Theopolisme 21:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict × 2) That's surprising, I've never heard of that before. Maybe it's designed in the template so editors whose article has been tagged leave comments on the talk page? I'm not sure tbh. LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 21:04, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

While it seems rather paradoxical, that's quite a smart conclusion... I'll look into the db-meta template code now. Theopolisme 21:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Ah, my problem was related to gadgets. Turning the Javascript Standard Library on whilst using Chrome causes problems. Had the gadget turned on for using extremely dated versions of IE. Should remember to turn that one off now. Noommos (talk) 21:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Hm - the JavaScript Standard Library isn't (and has never been) enabled for me... Theopolisme 22:09, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Theopolisme. You have new messages at Ducknish's talk page.
Message added 22:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ducknish (talk) 22:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Collin McLoughlin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bedford, NY

Nikolaus Ehlen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to German

Perudyptes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Basal

Thomas Gent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wirral

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Pacific flyer magazine

Hi there, i work for a magazine and notice it doesnt have a page although many other magazines have a page..... Just trying to get it listed http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Pacific_flyer_magazine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcoates (talk • contribs) 11:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

You may wish to take a look at this and this - let me know if you have questions! Theopolisme 21:20, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Jose Antonio Vargas

How is Jose in any legal way,an American? you keep changing it to say he is,where as in all legal,moral,ethical manners he is,as the story later lists,an Undocumented,or,Illegal alien that is here against the laws of the USA,and admits to breaking the law by using false documents.From your actions,you prove that you do not care for accuracy,much less the laws on the USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DAVIDB6311 (talk • contribs) 05:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Jose Antonio Vargas

I see no reply as to how he is an American citizen,as you and others wrongfully post him as,as well as your inability to reply to the rest of my question to you.I will take your silence as confirmation that I am right,and that you are wrong,but,you feel inaccurate posts make you feel better.That is fine,because the laws,as well as accuracy on the subject are on my side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DAVIDB6311 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Sea

Yes, please do discuss first. SpinningSpark 01:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1832 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH! News Good article nominee 04 Aug 2012 – Parental brain (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Carina1205 (t · c); see discussion AFCH script improvements 1.16 to 1.17 Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser ^TSU

• Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

RE: Top 100 New Zealand Songs

Fair call on the name being inappropriate, could change that to be related to Nature's Best. The problem is that there is no place online that officially has it (I'll be damned if I can find it on APRA, the only two listings are a personal blog and a Christchurch library!). It's frequently referred to in relation to songs as well, which makes checking difficult (e.g. how do you tell a song was voted #33 when the track listing on Nature's Best 2 here starts from 1 again? Or what of interviewers saying that Dave Dobbyn contributed to 10% of the list?) I could merge it in with the main article, but need to figure out how to do it best. The list is separate from the CDs as far as I know.

23:21, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Replied on your talk. Theopolisme 23:28, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

RE: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andhow.FM

Sorry to bother you, but is this allowed? He hasn't cited anymore new references. http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/AndHow.FM_107.5

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/AndHow.FM Vander Wallace (talk) 23:21, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Very true, very true. Have tagged the page for deletion as a recreation -- good catch. Theopolisme 23:27, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Wow, you are fast. Vander Wallace (talk) 23:32, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Happy to help! Let me know if there's ever anything else I can assist you with. Theopolisme 23:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Top 100 NZ Songs

Vickytnz (talk) 23:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

(Specifically, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Offline dispute brought to WP)

Hi mate, I know you are (entirely) an uninvolved editor as far as the first part of the dispute is concerned, but I thought I should at least let you know what was going on. Cheers, Stalwart111 (talk) 02:11, 24 September 2012 (UTC).

Page Curation newsletter

Hey Theopolisme. This will be, if not our final newsletter, one of the final ones :). After months of churning away at this project, our final version (apart from a few tweaks and bugfixes) is now live. Changes between this and the last release include deletion tag logging, a centralised log, and fixes to things like edit summaries.

Hopefully you like what we've done with the place; suggestions for future work on it, complaints and bugs to the usual address :). We'll be holding a couple of office hours sessions, which I hope you'll all attend. Many thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:26, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

FYI

WP:ISU (third bullet point) allows this - but it may be helpful to remind her not to edit on behalf of the site, and not to edit promotionally, of course - the latter of which I see you did. Best. NTox · talk 20:54, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

How right you are -- thanks for letting me know. Have done so on her talk. Appreciate it! Theopolisme 21:00, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

No prob. Have a good one. NTox · talk 21:04, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

FYI, WP:DRN

Something pretty odd happened here. ¦ Reisio (talk) 00:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

What on earth... Thanks for letting me know. I assume it was some sort of edit window issue ... Who knows, perhaps the latest version will solve it.... We shall see. Just another of the great Wiki-mysteries. Theopolisme 01:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Heh. You weren't using an odd browser for the edit or anything? Weird. :p ¦ Reisio (talk) 01:03, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Nope, just the latest dev build of Chromium... I suppose it could perhaps be a change on google's end - I'll take a look at the nightlies to see if anything peculiar changed in the past few hrs. Theopolisme 01:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

CVUA

Hi Theopolisme. I'm leaving you this message because you have previously been involved with Counter-Vandalism, and may still be. The Academy project has been restructured, placing responsibility for it on the trainers themselves and as part of the process I am trying to find out who is still interested in remaining as active trainers.

In future, there will be no clerking or coordination, so If you are still active and can respond to requests from students within around 48 hours, you need do nothing until a new student contacts you on your talk page. Nevertheless, if your status changes, please update your entry on the table of active trainers at the new WP:CVUA page. If you no longer have sufficient time to commit to the CV training project, that's fine, but please remove your name from the active list. While on your travels however, should you come across users who are having a hard time with their reverts, don't hesitate to send them a link to the CVUA. Thanks, and happy editing! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:41, 25 September 2012 (UTC)]

Smart idea to send this out. FWIW, you may wish to substitute the {{BASEPAGENAME}} template, if only to make your message seem a bit more personal. In any case, great idea -- thanks. Theopolisme 20:14, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

I don't believe in making fancy templates with frames and logos and sending them with a bot either for (relatively) low volume standard messages ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

That's not at all what I'm saying -- rather, I was suggesting that rather than you type: Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}. I'm leaving you this..., you should type Hi {{SUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}. I'm leaving you this... -- which has two benefits. A) It makes the message appear more personal (no jarring template if they hit edit in order to reply) and, B) save some server kitties by not calling the template. Theopolisme 20:56, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

It saved me time. That said, the new CVUA system saves a lot of server time by not having to call all the {{done}}, {{notdone}} templates, and other trinkets ;) Who is worried about the 'jarring' template anyway - we're all (supposedly) experienced editors and are above that, and not newbs needing to be handled with kid gloves. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:14, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Heh. But: what do you mean, it saved 'you' time? You were just copy/pasting the same message again and again ... well, I digress. I suppose the 3 or 4 seconds you saved not having to originally type subst: did make a world of difference. :) Theopolisme 21:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

It did :) truth is, I simply forgot to type 'subst' on the original. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Theopolisme 22:14, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Theopolisme. You have new messages at Fox2k11's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Fox2k11 (talk) 23:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

• In the media: Editor's response to Roth draws internet attention

• Recent research: "Rise and decline" of Wikipedia participation, new literature overviews, a look back at WikiSym 2012

• WikiProject report: 01010010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 01101001 01100011 01110011

• News and notes: UK chapter rocked by Gibraltar scandal

• Technology report: Signpost investigation: code review times

• Featured content: Dead as...

• Discussion report: Image filter; HotCat; Syntax highlighting; and more

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 18:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Oh Ok

Yeah I just decided to put it since on the Promo they said "On a new episode, the final season of iCarly Begins". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cookie10114 (talk • contribs) 22:57, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

CSD G12

Stating that an article (such as Kadrige) is copied from "many varied sources -- see linkedin, their website, blog posts, etc." is not as helpful as it could be. The reviewing admin needs to look at the sources, see the match, and verify the licensing. Without the links, it requires some detective work, but presumably, you already did that. You can list multiple urls in the template. The alternative is to list some of the source on the talk page. --SPhilbrick(Talk) 11:52, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks -- and sorry. How do you list multiple URLs in the {{db-g12}} template? Theopolisme 22:02, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Not a problem. As for the question, I haven't actually done it, but I've seen it done, I think it is as simple as separating the urls with a space. (I just tested in my sandbox, and it seems to work).--SPhilbrick(Talk) 23:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Having said that, I see that it doesn't process the Duplication Detector properly. I personally would prefer to have the multiple urls, if the largest one is not enough to justify deletion on its own. I don't need the DD in the case of copy-pastes, but use it when the problem is close paraphrasing. However, I can set it up myself, so my preference would be to see the multiple urls. Some may feel differently, so if you get push back, feel free to blame me, and I'll take it up with them. It is relatively rare to need to review more than one url, so I'm not inclined to work out a technical solution allowing multiple urls and multiple DDs simultaneously.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 23:10, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Alright, shall do. Thanks for the speedy response! Theopolisme 23:27, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

was accidental. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.48.169.110 (talk) 00:35, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Signature

Hi. I altered the code of an instance of your signature because for some reason it was turning everything after it green (strange, looking at the previous diff I don't see that issue anymore...). I suspect it's a rendering issue caused by one of the unclosed font tags, so please consider fixing the code so that everything properly nested and closed. Thanks. wctaiwan (talk) 09:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know -- have done so. Theopolisme 11:25, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing it. :) wctaiwan (talk) 12:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gaylords Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pantego (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Mood for a Day

When I read the stub of an article it told me almost nothing significant about the song and is one of the least known tracks from the album. Personally if "The Fish" wasn't so well written I probably would have asked for it's deletion as well, but Mood for a Day really shouldn't be an article. Yes, "Roundabout", "South Side of the Sky", "Long Distance Runaround", and "Heart of the Sunrise" need articles and are all well made, yes "The Fish" can stand an article and is well made. No, "Mood for a Day" really shouldn't have an article and was poorly made. Not a single, no cultural impact, poorly made article, article stub, not covered by many significant, and no awards. I know it's a great instrumental and I love it, but no minor Yes songs should not have articles. One more thing, if the song as important as "Starship Trooper" has no article, why should "Mood for a Day"? --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 21:50, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Mr. Moustache -- if you'd like, you can bring the article to WP:AfD ... the only reason I declined the speedy deletion was because WP:CSD#A9 is only for articles in which the artist's article doesn't exist. Theopolisme 22:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Oh... sorry I had trouble finding the correct template... If I could be given the right one I'd use that. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 23:39, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

These are the instructions. Let me know if you still need help! Theopolisme 04:35, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Tamil Nadu Council of Ministers related article deletion

Respected User:Theopolisme this article important. I will improve it later. if u gave me chance, i will improve it. Thank u ....User:Muniyankaruppan —Preceding undated comment added 22:33, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Muniyankaruppan! The reason I tagged them for deletion is because they are duplicates of the information included in other articles (namely Thirteenth Assembly of Tamil Nadu and others). While ordinarily your pages might just be redirected to the other ones, their titles just seem quite uncommon/excessive/long. Does that make sense? Thanks, Theopolisme 22:39, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Account Creation Interface

Requesting an account on the account creation interface. (identification diff) Theopolisme 07:53, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of the article Kadrige

Hi, I'm wondering why you requested a speedy deletion of the article Kadrige on septembre 27th on the gorund of copyright infrigement. Some sentences are from our company's own website, we therefore own the rights. Could you please help me? Thank you very much for your feedback.

Regards

Willhaddad (talk) 11:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

The only way to use copyrighted text, even if written by you, is to arrange for permission. You were given the link on your talk page, I'll repeat it here: Donating copyrighted materials--SPhilbrick(Talk) 12:00, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

For your activity on Glen Zipper :-)

Hashar (talk) 00:43, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

THe version you hve is not accurate. Thought you might like to correct it

The version you have up is not accurate. It says i joined in 1968. I joined in 1966. Dave quinn was not even mentioned as joining in 1969 . The band disbanded in 1969 when myself,Dave Quinn and Gene started a new band. Just wanted to set the record straight. Petcre (talk) 00:48, 2 October 2012 (UTC) 2/10/2012

I've attempted to correct it - let me know how it looks now. Theopolisme 00:56, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Billerica, Massachusetts

The town nickname "Somerville with Trees" is as valid as the others and its inclusion on the town's page is not vandalism. I would thank you kindly to replace it or to enable me to do so myself. --24.147.75.237 (talk) 03:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mac App Store on OS X Moutain Lion.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading File:Mac App Store on OS X Moutain Lion.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)