User talk:The owner of all/Archives/2023/September
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:The owner of all. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
September 2021
The owner of all/Archives/2023 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have read the guide to appealing blocks. I believe I should be unblocked because (1) the block is not necessary to prevent disruption - I had already indicated that after an opportunity for community input on my user page I would respect the result, and the result was that the disputed content was deleted; (2) if unblocked I will make productive contributions. As I have previously noted, I had been contributing without any issues other than the user page. [Also, some users such as the above have stated that they do not object to an unblock.] 23:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC) TOA The owner of all ☑️
I apologize for the attack content on my userpage. It was deleted, and if I am unblocked I will not restore it. 17:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC) TOA The owner of all ☑️
Decline reason:
You were explicitly given an opportunity to avoid drama and rejected it. Now you need to go the extra mile to reassure admins that you will cease all dramamongering. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I think you may have missed parts of my advice above. This does not appear to address the reason for the block in my opinion. I will leave this request open for another admin to review. SQLQuery Me! 00:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- The specified reason for the block is "personal attacks or harassment", I believe I have addressed it, the content that was perceived as attack/harassment was deleted, and I have stated that I will not restore that content. 00:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC) TOA The owner of all ☑️
- I will freely admit I've only giving things a cursory glance, but the text of your unblock request leads me to more think you are not addressing the issue (as User:SQL notes), but rather seem to be studiously avoiding saying it. This "feels" like there is a stick that still needs dropping. For clarity: I personally will not be going to decline or unblock unless/until I read up more on this. In case it needs to be said: other admins are welcome to review. - jc37 17:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- To me it is still unclear what the issue is if I haven't already addressed it. TNT (TheresNoTime) referred to "drama" in the link above, I am trying to avoid drama. I don't know how else to say that I am willing to "drop the wp:stick". In my recent contributions there are plenty of drama-free productive contributions to articles and discussions. And I apologize for the attack content from my userpage. That content was deleted and if unblocked I will not restore it. 17:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC) TOA The owner of all ☑️
- I will freely admit I've only giving things a cursory glance, but the text of your unblock request leads me to more think you are not addressing the issue (as User:SQL notes), but rather seem to be studiously avoiding saying it. This "feels" like there is a stick that still needs dropping. For clarity: I personally will not be going to decline or unblock unless/until I read up more on this. In case it needs to be said: other admins are welcome to review. - jc37 17:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- The specified reason for the block is "personal attacks or harassment", I believe I have addressed it, the content that was perceived as attack/harassment was deleted, and I have stated that I will not restore that content. 00:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC) TOA The owner of all ☑️
September 2021
The owner of all/Archives/2023 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I apologize for the attack content on my user page. If I am unblocked I will avoid "drama" and will focus on productive contributions. I have taken time to think about the circumstances that led to my block. My plan is that I will continue my good edits to articles while avoiding disputes. I understand that I am in the minority on Wikipedia and will not always get what I want. 02:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC) TOA The owner of all ☑️
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.