Reference requires paid subscription

edit

Dear The Rhymesmith I was looking at an edit you made on, or I think you made, where you added footnote one to the article Ikizukuri on 16 June 2010. When I tried to actually read the reference, it seemed like I would have to pay to subscribe to the London Times in order to read it. Therefore I believe it is not a good footnote. May I have your opinion? Greg Dahlen (talk) 14:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Krishna Menon14.jpg listed for discussion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krishna Menon14.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:38, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sheek Louch

edit
 

The article Sheek Louch has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:15, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Vengalil family for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vengalil family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vengalil family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jupitus Smart 01:46, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Janaki Ram for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janaki Ram is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janaki Ram until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jupitus Smart 02:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply