TheCatLife

January 2023

Hello, I'm Xexerss. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pokémon (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 17:08, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Wild Thornberrys Movie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Wild Thornberrys Movie, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

The source clearly says that Nickelodeon Movies distributed the film. You are changing this to say that Nickelodeon Movies produced the film. According to the source, this is wrong, and it violates text–source integrity. If you continue inserting false information, you will be blocked. Stop doing it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

I DIDN'T add false information, alright? I just I didn't read the sources, okay? TheCatLife (talk) 17:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Your recent editing history at Pokémon Ultimate Journeys: The Series shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Zsinj^Talk 03:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing the article Pokémon Ultimate Journeys: The Series for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 14:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Willow (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Locke Cole • t • c 01:51, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

WP:ANI

Hi TheCatLife, if you are concerned about BrickMaster02's conduct, take it to WP:ANI with links to evidence of misbehavior. Do not continue following them around and editing their comments, please. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to WEWS, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. No need to go tit for tat Vjmlhds (talk) 03:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Nathan Obral that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of The CW affiliates (table). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JBL (talk) 17:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Method to the madness

Just for clarity's sake, the reason why I did what I did was because I felt it was redundant overkill, but if it is the established format, then that's good enough for me. Vjmlhds (talk) 13:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your edits violate WP:OWN, trying to reshape the DTV tables into your own instead of the universal design squarely fall into that category! TheCatLife (talk) 15:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Wasn't trying to "own" anything, just trying something different. But as I said, what's there is the established format, I'll respect it and leave it as is. No need to start accusing people of things. Vjmlhds (talk) 17:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

KDKA+

KDKA-TV itself made the announcement and it was properly sourced. Get off your high horse, it's been made official. Nothing speculative at this point. Jgera5 (talk) 08:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello, I'm Lemonaka. I noticed that you recently removed content from KSBI without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -Lemonaka‎ 04:05, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Esolo5002 (talk) 20:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:TheImmortalKitten per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheImmortalKitten. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 11:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)