Taztouz

June 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Mister World 2010. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:35, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mister World 2010. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Please note that this includes edits made from other accounts or IP addresses. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:35, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

There is a report concerning you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. The report in question is the one referring to User:Taztouzi. You may like to participate in discussion there. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kent, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 05:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mister World 2010, you may be blocked from editing. As you know, you have made a disputed edit to Mister World 2010. You have failed to discuss the change at the article's talk page in spite of several requests that you do so. In response to your previous edits other editors have filed an assistance request and a 3RR (edit warring report). In neither case did you discuss your editing. The latter case resulted in an indefinite block to your Taztouzi account. The article page is currently semi-protected in response to your actions. Please note that as Taztouz you may also be blocked for disruptive editing. Susfele (talk) 14:16, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Taztouzi

I have filed a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Taztouzi alleging you are the same user as indefinitely blocked Taztouzi, and that you have also edited as Tazouz1 and through numerous I.P.'s. You may defend yourself against my allegations at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Taztouzi#Comments by accused parties. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims might help you defend yourself. Susfele (talk) 18:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Taztouzi. Thank you..Susfele (talk) 20:41, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 02:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.