Hello Streona, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Thank you for your contributions so far. If you have any questions, leave me a note on this page, or my talk page, and I'll try to help out ;)

Happy editing! EyeSereneTALK 15:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Crossbow

edit

I can't find anything about a 10th century Norse crossbow and I can't find this book you use as a reference. Do you have some other sources as well? Haukur 20:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I found it on a website,which gave this book as its source,homepages.tesco/~tinyclanger/fitzgreyve/albini_equipment_crossbows-lockbow.htm or just google "skane lockbow". The battle of Hjorongavagr is also well known- as I am sure you know- and there may be information from accounts of this too

Streona 13:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

That page doesn't mention the battle of Hjörungavágr. What's your source for that? Haukur —Preceding comment was added at 18:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Chronology of the Crossbow from http/www.thebeckoning.com/medieval/crossbow/chronology This in turn cites W.F.Paterson "A guide to the Crossbow" Society of Antiquary Archers,1990- which is why I originally cited it on the stub, but has since been removed.Streona 21:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Cross04.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Lane End, Isle of Wight

edit

A tag has been placed on Lane End, Isle of Wight, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --stephenw32768<user page><talk> 09:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Little context in Hale Common

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hale Common, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hale Common is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hale Common, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 10:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your Isle of Wight articles

edit

Hi, thanks for the message you left me. You accidentally left it on my user page though, not my talk page! Easily done; I've made the same mistake myself in the past.

Regarding your short Isle of Wight articles; just make sure to indicate in the article that they refer to a place on the Isle of Wight, and include {{IsleofWight-geo-stub}} at the bottom if they're stubs. That way, you provide enough context.

Happy Wiki-ing!

--stephenw32768<user page><talk> 11:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cunnan

edit

Hi Streona, and thanks for the message. Looking at that site, they are definitely using the Wiki software, which is freely available for anyone who wants it. This availability, and frustration with Wikipedia's rules on what does/doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, has led to people setting up hundreds of independent Wikis, many of them hosted on the same server (Wikia) but all of them separate from Wikipedia (some of the best known are Wookieepedia (the Star Wars wiki) and the World of Warcraft Wiki). This means the Cunnan Wiki is completely unrelated to Wikipedia; it just happens to use the same software - it was very good of you to correct the articles there, and hopefully it's appreciated, but obviously we have no oversight there.

As far as content goes, all Wikipedia articles are freely available for anyone to do anything they want with, including copy/change/try to sell/whatever. The only real restrictions are that any derivative work must be released under a similar free license to Wikipedia, and we must be credited somewhere. If the Cunnan site has used Wikipedia articles, or portions of them, they must give attribution somewhere on the site (usually a mention on each page that "this site contains material from Wikipedia..." is sufficient). If not, we can follow this up further as they would be in breach of copyright. Stuff that you've added to their site is licensed under their rules, so that wouldn't be covered. However, I think your note was more concerned with accuracy than plagarism - as I said, we have no say in how they run their Wiki, but from your message it's easy to see why they'd want to host their own stuff rather than fight through Wikipedia policies on accuracy and verification to get it on here ;)

Hope this helps, EyeSereneTALK 12:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm not familiar with Conservapedia beyond what I've seen in various papers (the Guardian seems to love it!). You've shattered my illusions regarding Ann Widdecombe though - are you certain? Oh well... Merry Christmas to you too :) EyeSereneTALK 19:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dinosaur

edit

Why have you just removed all the interwiki links? Hut 8.5 17:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Because my 9 year old son has got at my account. Sorry.

Streona (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Never mind, I've seen worse... Hut 8.5 10:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Derek Beackon

edit
 

An editor has nominated Derek Beackon, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Beackon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pirates

edit

Hello there, and welcome to Wikipedia. I don't know if "Frontal lobe damage would cause a lack of inhibition in speech and behaviour often associated with pirates." is meant as a joke, but that whole section is more appropriate for the general article on Pirates, than for International Talk Like a Pirate Day. It'd also be good if you could mention the source that you were drawing the information from, so that other editors could find out more about it. Thanks. --McGeddon (talk) 00:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you've got a source, that's great, but this whole section should definitely be moved to the pirates article (or possibly pirates in popular culture, which has a section about piratical speech). It's only about the international day in the sense of background information - it's really about pirates. --McGeddon (talk) 11:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry

edit

Hello,

I don't know if you noticed (I hope not), but I briefly blocked your account. It should be unblocked now; please try to edit the WP:Sandbox to see if you're unblocked. If there is a stray autoblock, please follow the directions on the autoblock notice, and someone will be by soon to help.

Explanation: you posted a reply on User talk:SineBot directly under a message from a known, serial vandal. Her style of writing is very distinctive. Since you posted "inside" her thread, so to speak, your edit summary had the title of her previous heading in it. I'm watching the page, saw that heading, and stupidly jumped to the conclusion that you had created the header. I just blocked out of reflex. When I went to see what else she had edited that I needed to revert, I noticed that everything looked, well, written by a rational human. Only then did I actually check the text of your message on SineBot's talk, and realize my mistake.

Hope you'll accept my apologies, and that this doesn't cause any complications in your editing. Sorry! --barneca (talk) 15:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Pondwell

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Pondwell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 15:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edit to Talk:Tom Clarke

edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! Scolaire (talk) 19:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Zoo tycoon complete collection

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Zoo tycoon complete collection requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 20:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please be careful

edit

Hi, I don't want to sound uncivil as we all make mistakes, however please be careful when you undo revisions to try and prevent things like this from happening. Thanks and happy editing :) ~ Ameliorate U T C @ 09:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have replied here. ~ Ameliorate U T C @ 00:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fear

edit

"Because History is not Racism, - in fact Anglo-Saxon, like Celticism is not necessarily a race, but a culture and fear of who?"

It's both culture and race, you cannot separate the two. This is why England's culture of late consists almost entirely of rising racial and religious antagonism, petty crime and unfortunate teenage pregnancies.

You're afraid of admitting any truths because you don't want to look unpopular or illiberal. If you admit the existence of races, that makes you racist; if you admit the differences between sexes, that makes you sexist; if you admit there are differences in intellect between people, that makes you elitist; and so on and so on. Transcend this pathetic crowd play.

You've swallowed the liberal lie that protecting ones kin over any others in any form is wrong. The Anglo-Saxons you revere were not yet so gullible. Zxcvbispass (talk) 00:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

REPLY

edit

Whilst I am not prepared to go to zxcvbispass user page (which seems to have been especially created to edit the BNP article, especially as zxcvb occur together on the keyboard just as qwertyuiop does, so "sockpuppet" might be more appropriate) to have a discussion with these kind of people (in the words of Woody Allen in Annie Hall or Manhattan "We should attack them with satire and reasoning" "Yeah and take a few baseball bats to put our finer parts of logic across") -should he/she return to this page - this is the answer;

Recent DNA studies indicate that "English" people are descended from various roots, but mostly not Anglo-Saxon. Most appear to be from the stone age people who came after the Ice Age. The Anglo-Saxons do not appear to have wiped out the "Britons", mostly NOT Celts for the same reason, but to have interbred with them. The early Wessex kings had in some cases,very "British" or Welsh names such as Cerdic (which is the same as "Caractacus"), Caedwalla and English names such as "Aethelweah" ("noble foreigner") and Cenwalh ("bright foreigner"). The likelihood is that a small number of Anglo-Saxon men came over on boats and interbred with local women. Th Laws of Ine refer to differing wergilds for Britons as for Saxons. So from their inception the Anglo-Saxons were a mixed race. Alfred the Great was especially open to foreign ideas and sent an embassy to India and explorers to the Baltic. His whole strategy was based upon making piece between himself and the danes at the Peace of Wedmore. Early Archbishops of Canterbury - such as Theodore and Deodatus, were in fact Greek, and Athelstan's court in particular began our proud tradition - until destroyed by New Labour- of protecting refugees (such as Louis D'Outremer). The Early Church decreed that King Edwy's marriage to his foster-sister, Edgiva, was incestuous, due to being within (or in fact at) 9 degrees of consanguinity- which must have made miscegenation virtually compulsory. King Ethelred the Unready in 1002 committed the St. Bric's Day Massacre against "Danish" civilians- which would no doubt make him a hero to the BNP- but which got him precisely nowhere. I am, not necessarily proud of my ancestry, because it is something over which I have no control- but neither am I ashamed. I think Anglo-Saxon culture and language has given the World great cultural and scientific riches- not least the World Language of English and values such as stubborn resistance to fascism, tolerance, broad mindedness and all the things that make us Great that the BNP and their like so despise and would destroy. We have from our beginning been a mongrel race, our language a mongrel language and our culture a mongrel culture. Its called "hybrid vigour".

To Do

edit

King's Quay DONE

Pubs of the Isle of Wight IOW Catholic Martyrs Rivers of the IOW- Palmers Brook Lukely Brook Deadmans Brook

Royal Navy ;Anglo Saxon Period.

Newtown (Ferguson Gang etc.)

Redirects

edit

Regarding to your created page King's Quay Shore, you might want to read up on Redirects at Help:Redirect. I fixed it for you this time :-) So#Why review me! 14:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Dinosaur#Christianity

edit

Your response at Talk:Dinosaur#Christianity was a beautiful combination of tact and scientific rigour. -- Philcha (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:Wight

edit

Hello! I know you've done a lot of work on Isle of Wight articles, and thought you'd be interested to know that I've just started Wikipedia:WikiProject Wight. I think there's a lot more that can be done with the island's articles, and this should help us all to work together consistently. I hope to see you there! --Peeky44 (talk) 11:51, 21 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Redress (charitable organisation)

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Redress (charitable organisation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. J Milburn (talk) 11:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Redress (charitable organisation)

edit
 

I have nominated Redress (charitable organisation), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redress (charitable organisation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 13:06, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, sorry, I realised you'd done that and added a comment to the AfD page clarifying that. The article is now at AfD, so you'll have to convince people there that the article should be kept, rather than me. J Milburn (talk) 13:15, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hi,
If you're going to prevent the article from being deleted, you need to do more than just post on the talk page. The page is deleted or kept based on the discussion found at the AFD (Articles For Deletion, here). You must make your argument based on our policies, not on bare assertions; in this case the policy is articles for deletion, and the relevant guidelines are at notability for organizations - you should also review arguments to avoid.
The short version is - find press and other media that are independent of the organization, that mention it. Ideally that discuss it in detail. If The Times did an article, you're pretty golden, so long as it's not just a mere mention. Add them to the page, and point out on the AFD discussion that you have done so. One argument to avoid is "torture is really bad, and this organization is against torture, so it's really important". That's one that we see a lot. WLU (talk) 00:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Michal Morey

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Michal Morey, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wightonline.co.uk/wfiles/wfiles_pages/michalmorey.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Michal Morey

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Michal Morey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just to inform you, I have removed the CSD notice because I think it has been placed in error. You should expand the article with references and in-line citations because while CSD is unlikely imho, an AfD might be likely. You should be prepared for this to happen. SoWhy 17:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Talk:Margaret Thatcher. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. 81.178.81.21 (talk) 20:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

BNP Councillors

edit

Out of 55 councillors the BNP have lost a number due to expulsions and splits. These are

Simon Smith - expelled from the BNP due to supporting a different leadership candidate

Peter Pirnie- co-opted to Kingswear Parish Council, this co-option was rescinded due to his being a member of the BNP.

Colin Auty- expelled for standing against Griffin for leadership

Robin Evans

Maureen Stowe

Sadie Graham - expelled for "rebellion" against Griffin

Cllr Chris Beverley (Yorkshire Elections Officer, Leeds Organiser & Advisory Council Member)

Cllr Dave Brown (Broxtowe)

Cllr Nina Brown (East Mids Regional Secretary & Broxtowe Organiser)

Cllr Roger Robertson (South East Regional Organiser & Advisory Council Member) - co opted Hartney Witley in

Hampshire

Councillors

edit

From their ranks of up to 55 councillors the BNP have lost a substantial proportion through resignations expulsions and splits. The BNP councillors have particular disadvantages which many other councillors do not have. Instances of various misdemeanours are closely watched by opponents and widely advertised- although all councillors will face scrutiny from opposing parties locally. When the first BNP councillor, Derek Beackon was elected in the Isle of Dogs, local council staff staged a mass walkout. He found himself isolated from officers and councillors, most of whom refused to speak to him at all, making it especially difficult to understand the workings of the council and impaired his effectiveness. Others have had similar experiences, which has often resulted in exceptionally poor attendance records and disillusionment. Some have been obstructed by official actions against them and been prevented from fulfilling their dutues by suspension or by bail conditions. However as the party increases its pool of experienced councillors this could be improved from their point of view, although the actions of existing councillors have not produced any positive role models as yet.

The internal party democracy of the BNP has been criticised by members for giving too much power to the Chairman and for not being widely available for the membership to consult. In 2007 a leadership challenge to Griffin by Colin Auty http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/dewsbury-news/Auty-quits-after-BNP-leadership.4455958.jp and previously by Colin Jackson resulted in resignations and expulsions of their supporters and 67 senior activists including many councillors resigning the whip after Councillor Nina Brown claimed that BNP Security had misled her into giving them the key to the home of fellow BNP councillor Sadie Graham in order to ransack it, searching for evidence of her support for Auty's leadership bid. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/dec/18/politics.thefarright

Others, such as Daniel Kelly in Barking & Dagenham or Angela Clarke in Keighley, have resigned due to "not understanding what was going on" . Some have been suspended from the council. Luke Smith (a Burnley councillor) was expelled for glassing another BNP reveller at the 2003 Red. White And Blue Festival and was banned from being a councillor by the Standards Board for England, following his being banned from football matches for hooliganism. (Luke Smith later hanged himself in 2008).

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/burnley/3559576.Disturbance_after_ex_B%20urnley_BNP_councillor_s_funeral/

Smith's uncle Simon Smith was himself suspended for the racialist content of his website, before leaving the BNP in support of Sadie Graham. He said of Luke Smith,(who was awaiting sentencing for beating up a barman before he hanged himself outside the pub).

“He was a lovely, lovely lad who, like a lot of people, was just too sensitive to exist in what is effectively an extremely cruel world." [1]

Terry Farr, a councillor in Epping, resigned to spend more time with his family after a suspension for writing abusive letters to Trevor Phillips

John Rowe, a Burnley councillor, has been excluded from meetings due to his bail conditions after setting off fire alarms. http://www.burnleyexpress.net/burnleynews/Police-eject-BNP-man-from.4463648.jp

Others have become disenchanted with the BNP itself. In September 2007, Robin Evans, a BNP councillor in Blackburn, walked out of the party, then wrote a letter to his former colleagues denouncing them as a party of drug-dealers and football hooligans. He remains a councillor, describing himself as a "national socialist". http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1517025/Vote-BNP-and-youre-as-bad-as-they-are.html?mobile=true

Another Burnley councillor Maureen Stowe, resigned from the BNP in 2004 claiming that they had concealed their fascist nature from her.http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=856 http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2004/jun/14/localgovernment.politics

James Lloyd, a BNP councillor in Sandwell was suspended for not attending enough council meetings. www.expressandstar.com/2007/10/16/bnp-man-kicked-out/

As the BNP has yet to gain power in any locality, it has not yet had the opportunity to show its policies in action. However any policy explicitly based on treating ethnic minorities less favourably would have to comply with national legislation designed to prevent such policies, which would constrain the freedom of action of such a council.


Joanne Beverley,Malcolm Porter, John Ryde (Hugglescote), Graham Partner, Lewis Allsebrook 15


daniel kelly . bailey, Angela Clarke watkins

farr http://www.guardian-series.co.uk/news/1532030.breaking_news_bnp_councillor_resigns_from_district_council/ stowe http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2004/jun/14/localgovernment.politics graham http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/dec/18/politics.thefarright rowe http://www.burnleyexpress.net/burnleynews/Police-eject-BNP-man-from.4463648.jp


Robertson (South East Regional Organiser & Advisory Council Member) - co opted Hartney Witley in

Hampshire

Councillors

edit

From their ranks of up to 55 councillors the BNP have lost a substantial proportion through resignations expulsions and splits. The BNP councillors have particular disadvantages which many other councillors do not have. Instances of various misdemeanours are closely watched by opponents and widely advertised- although all councillors will face scrutiny from opposing parties locally. When the first BNP councillor, Derek Beackon was elected in the Isle of Dogs, local council staff staged a mass walkout. He found himself isolated from officers and councillors, most of whom refused to speak to him at all, making it especially difficult to understand the workings of the council and impaired his effectiveness. Others have had similar experiences, which has often resulted in exceptionally poor attendance records and disillusionment. Some have been obstructed by official actions against them and been prevented from fulfilling their dutues by suspension or by bail conditions. However as the party increases its pool of experienced councillors this could be improved from their point of view, although the actions of existing councillors have not produced any positive role models as yet.

The internal party democracy of the BNP has been criticised by members for giving too much power to the Chairman and for not being widely available for the membership to consult. In 2007 a leadership challenge to Griffin by Colin Auty [2] and previously by Colin Jackson resulted in resignations and expulsions of their supporters and 67 senior activists including many councillors resigning the whip after Councillor Nina Brown claimed that BNP Security had misled her into giving them the key to the home of fellow BNP councillor Sadie Graham in order to ransack it, searching for evidence of her support for Auty's leadership bid. [3]

Others, such as Daniel Kelly in Barking & Dagenham or Angela Clarke in Keighley, have resigned due to "not understanding what was going on" . Some have been suspended from the council. Luke Smith (a Burnley councillor) was expelled for glassing another BNP reveller at the 2003 Red. White And Blue Festival and was banned from being a councillor by the Standards Board for England, following his being banned from football matches for hooliganism. (Luke Smith later hanged himself in 2008).

[4]

Smith's uncle Simon Smith was himself suspended for the racialist content of his website, before leaving the BNP in support of Sadie Graham. He said of Luke Smith,(who was awaiting sentencing for beating up a barman before he hanged himself outside the pub).

“He was a lovely, lovely lad who, like a lot of people, was just too sensitive to exist in what is effectively an extremely cruel world." [5]

Terry Farr, a councillor in Epping, resigned to spend more time with his family after a suspension for writing abusive letters to Trevor Phillips

John Rowe, a Burnley councillor, has been excluded from meetings due to his bail conditions after setting off fire alarms. [6] James Lloyd, a BNP councillor in Sandwell was suspended for not attending enough council meetings. He attributed this to business difficulties following the closure of his pub, a favourite with BNP activists due to his non cooperation with police investigations into repeated violent incidents. [7] Others have become disenchanted with the BNP itself. In September 2007, Robin Evans, a BNP councillor in Blackburn, walked out of the party, then wrote a letter to his former colleagues denouncing them as a party of drug-dealers and football hooligans. He remains a councillor, describing himself as a "national socialist". [8]

Another Burnley councillor Maureen Stowe, resigned from the BNP in 2004 claiming that they had concealed their fascist nature from her. [9] [10] Answering these charges, BNP loyalists have suggested that she is a "witch" (although this was unsubstantiated). As the BNP has yet to gain power in any locality, it has not yet had the opportunity to show its policies in action. However any policy explicitly based on treating ethnic minorities less favourably would have to comply with national legislation designed to prevent such policies, which would constrain the freedom of action of such a council.

Footnote problems

edit

Hi Streona. I've responded to your request on my talk. Cheers, Olaf Davis | TalkP08:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply




Completed at Paul Rosenberg (murder)


-

A reference for your Mr. 10% remark. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C00E2D61E30F93AA35752C0A96E958260 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080828/ap_on_re_as/pakistan_president10_percent http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-09-04-pakistan_N.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 903M (talkcontribs) 05:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

BNP Difficulties with Employment

edit

The BNP has a track record of thrying to suppress manifestations of Islam. It does not mention this specifically in its manifesto, but it endoeses a book by one of its members entitled "Jihad- Islam's 13oo year war against the West" the final chapter of which propese the "hard choices" to be made to save Western Christian Civilsation. Unfortunately I am not privy to precisely what that might be, but I think we know who it will be hard for. Fellow European fascists- such as the Danish People's Party- advocate a total ban on Islam altoopgether. Links for BNP attempts to ban Islamic expression-

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/08/bnp-exclusive-government-grovelling-to-muslims-opens-school-doors-to-extremists/ - 103k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/03/will-it-take-an-act-of-terrorist-barbarity-before-this-government-bans-the-wearing-of-the-burka-in-public/

http://www.thisislincolnshire.co.uk/news/BNP-leader-s-comment-church-despicable/article-303488-detail/article.html

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/.../bnp’s-richard-barnbrook-to-speak-at-international-anti-islamification-rally-today-in-german... - 123k


http://www.tuc.org.uk/ctfr/action_by_emp_and_TU.pdf kevin scott b&q http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/1989997.stm

Simone Clarke is a principal ballerina at the English National Ballet and a deputy for the entertainer's union Equity. Her membership of the BNP was unknown until exposed by an undercover Guardian journalist in 2006. Her performances were picketted by anti-fascists demanding her sacking. However the ENB refused to do so, as she had done nothing else to warrant this. She was supported by her union Equity. [11]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/programmes/2001/bnp_special/pr_machine/default.stm

Potter v PS

17. This argument, it should be pointed out, is not on all fours with Redfearn. Redfearn establishes that it is not direct discrimination on grounds of race to discriminate against somebody because they are a BNP member. Here discrimination arises from the different treatment that is afforded to white racist organisations as opposed to members of racist organisations which are non-white. Mr Barnes relies strongly on the observations of Lord Steyn, to which I have made reference, and submits that it would be wrong in this case to shut out the Claimant at this stage without giving him an opportunity to marshal such evidence as he has to make good his allegation.

http://www.ier.org.uk/system/files/ASLEF+v+UK+final+for+website+corr+by+jh1.pdf hendy on aslef redfearn


http://www.practicallaw.com/jsp/binaryContent.jsp?item=:34774387 pramjit sadra tom hawke clive potter harrington clarke adam walker, mark walker

First Sikh joins Solidarity 20/04/07 Opponents of the Independent Trade Union Solidairit have falsely claimed that it was 'racist'. This is despite the fact that their very Constitution makes it clear that it is open to all regardless of political opinion, ethnicity or faith. The Union (supported by Third Way) stands for freedom and for the rights of all British Workers. This month they welcomed thier first Sikh member. Pramjit Sadra explained his reasons for joining Solidarity:- "I have been aware of the shift of work away from ordinary British people which I feel undermines our communities. The shift toward cheap migrant workers and off-shoring, if allowed to continue will totally change this Nation. The effects have already been felt by many in the UK losing work to cheaper labour or suppressing wages, which does not just affect one individual but their immediate family and children, extended family and the communities they have long been part of.

We are at best an overcrowded Nation that cannot sustain the influx of many Nationalities without the infrastructure to employ, house and integrate into our communities. Furthermore there is no recognition of the impact of importing cultures, including those with a violent/aggressive way of life, upon settled communities."

Let's hope that Pramjit is the first of many and that Solidarity grows both in strength and diversity of support.

third way website nakkeeran arasaratnam


BNP members have suffered various difficulties in employment.

lobbied for BNP members to be dismissed. In the case of ASLEF v. United Kingdom the European Court of Human Rights overturned an employment appeal tribunal finding, awarding a BNP train driver damages for expulsion. It found that the union were entitled to do so, and that this was not a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights.

In the case of Baggs v. Fudge (2005)UKET, Robert Baggs, represented by he BNP legal officer, Lee Barnes, claimed that he had been discriminated against on the grounds of "religion, or similar philosophical belief" (contrary to the Employment (Religious Discrimination) Regulations 2003, when applying for a job at a G.P. surgery. The Employment Tribunal found that membership of the BNP was not a "similar" belief, and the case was rejected.

Advice from Stuart Chamberlain of Gee Consult, management consultants has been that a similar case might be successful since the removal of the qualification "similar" from philosophical belief by an amendment in 2007. -"Cases concerning claims made by British National Party’s (BNP) members that their fascist beliefs were similar to religious beliefs have previously been decided in favour of the employer or potential employer. However, under the new law, a strong argument could be made to the contrary." [12]

However, this has not been tested and there is a clause in the regulations which provide that the beliefs of employees may be required to be in line with the "ethos" of the organisation.

Mr.Redfearn was a bus driver whose BNP membership was unknown to his employers, Serco, until he was elected as a councillor. He was sacked as the employers were concerned that he might endanger their contract with a local authotity to transport vulnerable people from a day centre of various ethnicities. The decision in Redfearn v.Serco (2006 CA) is summarised thus; "where an employee who is a member of a racist group (in this case the BNP political party) is dismissed because of the danger that his continuing employment might lead to violence in the workplace, the dismissal can properly be regarded as being for legitimate health and safety reasons and will not be unlawful race discrimination." [13]

Organisations which ban BNP membership

Police ; Membership of the BNP, C18 and the National Front was specifically by David Blunkett, following an undercover TV exposure of racism in a police training centre. Despite this Simon Darby has claimed that the BNP still has members who remain covert. Police authorities have taken this very seriously and Manchester Police Authority have viewed footage taken at BNP events in order to identify off-duty officers in attendance at a BNP St.George's Day rally, wearing BNP badges and T-shirts, with the slogan "Love Britain or Fuck Off". [14] A retired police officer, standing as a European Assembly candidate, Inspector Phazey, has said that he was a member in defiance of the prohibition and that other serving officers remained members. He denied that he was a racist or that the police were institutionally racist, saying;

"Of course you heard words like paki and nigger, but it didn't mean much more than someone saying paddy for an Irishman or jerry for a German. It was just the language of working-class blokes. There was a fair bit of leg-pulling but it was never malicious. I remember there was one officer who, whenever an Asian officer came into the room, would go, 'Coon, coon,' like he was making the noise of a pigeon. But it was a joke. It's like saying paddies are as thick as two short planks or jocks are tight-fisted. It was just jokes in the canteen. You'll get that anywhere when you have men in their 20s and 30s together." [15] A Police Community Support Officer, Ellis Hammond, was found to be a BNP member after he was discovered stockpiling weapons at his home, including tazers,[16]

Armed Forces ; Since the Second World War, servicemen and women have been banned from membership of organisations designated as "Communist or Fascist" and this includes the BNP. [17]

Prison Service ;

A ban on BNP membership was imposed by Martin Narey, Director of the Prison Service in 2002. Narey told the BBC that he received hate mail and a death threat as a result. [18]

Other Professions;

Bans on BNP membership in the probation service and the civil services have been under consideration. [19] [20] A proposal to ban the BNP from Dorset Fire Brigade, proposed by the management and the Fire Brigades Union, was turned down by the Fire Authority.[21] The chairman of the BNP linked trade union "Solidarity", Adam Walker was sacked by his college for accessing BNP websites and posting comments. He has been summoned to a hearing of the general Teaching Council, with a view to preventing him from working as a teacher in the United Kingdom.[22] His brother, Mark Adams has also been sacked, from another college, specifically for BNP membership.[23] Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).. Both appear to have an otherwise unblemished record.[24]

A sociology student, Liam Birch, standing as a BNP council candidate for Southway was sacked as assistant warden at Plymouth University, when his BNP membership was known via an internet blog concerning the Holocaust, saying "The Jews declared war on Germany, not the other way round". [25]


Police

Police officers have been forbidden to be members of the BNP since the exposure of racism in police training centres in 2004. Ellis Hammond Phazey www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2004/jul/28/race.ukcrime

Armed Forces

Members of the Armed Forces have been forbidden mumbership of Communist or Fascist organisations since...

Prison Service A ban on BNP membership was imposed by Martin Narey, Director of the Prisi=on Service in 2002. Student in Plymouth ;liam birch sociology student Source: http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=141529&command=displayContent&sourceNode=141513&contentPK=14629543&moduleName=InternalSearch&formname=sidebarsearch

The national spokesman for the BNP, Dr Phill Edwards, yesterday cast doubt on whether the Internet blogs could be linked to Mr Birch. He said: "The blogs appear to be a debate about historical matters which have no relevance to the political campaigning currently being sucessfully undertaken by the BNP. "Neither do the blogs show 'Nazi sympathies' but are part of a debate. As far as Plymouth University is concerned, by taking away his wardenship they are breaking their traditional role of allowing freedom of political association, political debate and instead have adopted a totalitarian stance. Liam tells me that on matters of 'Holocaust denial', like the rest of us, he must accept it as a fundamental truth or face arrest and prosecution by the EU police Europol." He added: "Liam is not anti-semitic and his girlfriend is half Jewish."

BNP member covertly poses as policeman - Times Online - 12:469 Mar 2008 ... The BNP membership ban is creeping into other areas of employment and is ,without doubt ,another attempt by the political establishment to ... www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3512152.ece - Similar pages - Note this

BBC NEWS | Politics | Civil service BNP ban considered - 14:0019 Sep 2004 ... The Home Office is considering whether to ban BNP members from working in the civil service. news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3669836.stm - 31k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this Teachers call for ban on BNP members in class | Education ...Teachers have called on the education secretary, Alan Johnson, to ban members of the far right BNP from working in schools. www.guardian.co.uk/education/2006/jul/17/schools.uk1 - 75k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this BNP member may be struck off teaching register | Politics | The ...19 Sep 2008 ... A teacher and prominent British National party member could be struck from .... Jul 17 2006. Teachers call for ban on BNP members in class ... www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/sep/19/bnp.schools - Similar pages - Note this Diversity / Equal opportunities - European court upholds Aslef ...European court upholds Aslef union's right to ban BNP from membership. 21 March 2007 09:48. The European Court of Human Rights has upheld the right of trade ... www.personneltoday.com/articles/.../european-court-upholds-aslef-unions-right-to-ban-bnp-from-membership.html - 39k -

£5000 for BNP member expelled by train union - Times Online - 13:37The ban on BNP membership for prison officers was imposed in 2002 by Martin Narey, then director general of the prison service. ... www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article491799.ece - Similar pages - Note this More results from www.timesonline.co.uk »

TEACHING Defending the BNP - 14:0419 Sep 2008 ... He’s a BNP member and a teacher. It certainly seems like they’re trying to ban him from being a teacher because he’s a BNP member. ... timworstall.com/2008/09/19/defending-the-bnp/ - 41k -


Members of far-right groups may face teaching ban - Education News ... - 14:08Members of far-right groups may face teaching ban ... A spokesman for the BNP said the party did have teacher and lecturer members and they were trying to ... www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education.../members-of-farright-groups-may-face-teaching-ban-491225.ht... - 56k -

FIRE SERVICE

Results 21 - 30 of about 15,600 for ban bnp membership. (0.09 seconds) 

Search Results[PDF] DORSET FIRE AUTHORITY FAILS TO BACK CFO ON BNP BAN - 14:10File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat But Authority members rejected a. recommendation to ban the BNP,. paving the way for racists to join. up. Martin Chapman told the. Authority that: ... www.fbu.org.uk/newspress/ebulletin/pdf/75.pdf - Similar pages - Note this


BUS DRIVER Redfearn Bradford Wisbey

www.cloisters.com/info_case_profile.php?caseID=177&returl=search.php%3F%26amp%3Bkeywords%3Dserco -


Baggs Calne Corsham

Teachers call for ban on BNP members in class | Education ...Teachers have called on the education secretary, Alan Johnson, to ban members of the far right BNP from working in schools. www.guardian.co.uk/education/2006/jul/17/schools.uk1 - 75k -

References
  1. ^ http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/mail/news/page.cfm?objectid=17234772&method=full&siteid=50002 http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/3219794.Ex_BNP_man_found_hanged_near_Burnley_pub/
  2. ^ http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/dewsbury-news/Auty-quits-after-BNP-leadership.4455958.jp
  3. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/dec/18/politics.thefarright
  4. ^ http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/burnley/3559576.Disturbance_after_ex_B%20urnley_BNP_councillor_s_funeral/
  5. ^ http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/mail/news/page.cfm?objectid=17234772&method=full&siteid=50002 http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/3219794.Ex_BNP_man_found_hanged_near_Burnley_pub/
  6. ^ http://www.burnleyexpress.net/burnleynews/Police-eject-BNP-man-from.4463648.jp. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  7. ^ http://www.expressandstar.com/2007/10/16/bnp-man-kicked-out/
  8. ^ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1517025/Vote-BNP-and-youre-as-bad-as-they-are.html?mobile=true
  9. ^ http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=856. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help),
  10. ^ "http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2004/jun/14/localgovernment.politics". {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help)
  11. ^ http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-425586/The-BNP-Ballerina.html
  12. ^ http://www.consultgee.com/aboutus/press_ReligiousDiscrimination.html
  13. ^ http://www.emplaw.co.uk/researchfree-redirector.aspx?StartPage=data%2f2005irlr744.htm
  14. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/may/12/ukcrime.thefarright
  15. ^ http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4156/is_/ai_n12586083
  16. ^ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3512152.ece
  17. ^ http://www.army.mod.uk/documents/general/queens_regulations_incl_a27.pdf
  18. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4247329.stm
  19. ^ news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3669836.stm - 30k
  20. ^ www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/feb/01/thefarright.ukcrime - 73k
  21. ^ news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/dorset/4373152.stm - 28k
  22. ^ news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wear/7627055.stm
  23. ^ news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wear/7627055.stm
  24. ^ news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wear/7627055.stm - 44k
  25. ^ http://www.bristol.indymedia.org/newswire.php?story_id=25066

RE: BNP Offensive vandalism

edit

Thanks for that. Fact is, I've been away from Wikipedia for most of the last two months and have hardly shown my face. Got back to find this on my talk page:

"You are a self centred sanctimonious son orf a bitch, who will not allow any edit that disagrees with your own narrow minded point of view on any page at all. You are the worst person I have ever encountered and brand other users as racist or fascist, without any form of proof or evidence. You fail under all ciscumstances to recognise that somebody could be right other than you. You rely on being over the top, heavy handed and rude. You never focus soley on thesubstance of the discussion, you instead revert to cheap point scoring and will attack users, violate rules on biographies of living people and allways push your POV and ram it down other users throats. You should have been banned a long long time ago and have had all access to giving an opinion removed. I hope that one day you learn that you cannot get away with antagonising other users and get your comuppance in a big way."

That came from [[1]], and is their ONLY contribution to Wikpedia (though I suspect I may know who it is). Like you say, probably best to take it as a compliment. Emeraude (talk) 19:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Don't you think the man/woman who typed that may have a point? I mean if you are really honest about it? 81.156.39.59 (talk) 20:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Better spelling than usual. Patrick Harrington, maybe?--Streona (talk) 22:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re ASLEF case, the Court's judgement merely says "The applicant was represented by Thompsons, solicitors practising in London". The full text is here. The applicant, of course, was ASLEF. I very much doubt that Lee would have been represented in the Court, it being a case between the union and the UK government. Emeraude (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately that edit pretty much sums up my attitude towards you. Independent assessment has found the BNP article to be biased against them, and ytou continue to make it even more biased. Alleging that an old man who once fought to save your country has Alzheimer's simply because he now holds a view you disagree with is nothing short of appalling, as was the assertion that the BNP would have been on Hitler's side during World War 2. I'm no BNP cheerleader and can't defend the more extreme aspects of their views, but let's try to make a balanced article. If you're as strongly openly anti-something as you state, maybe not contributing to the BNP page would be a better move for everybody.--MartinUK (talk) 20:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Redfearn

edit

I could not find an online copy of the Court of Appeal judgement of Lord Justice Mummery Redfearn V. Serco (2006) IRLR 623, but it is quoted in a briefing paper by John Hendy QC and Michael Ford on ASLEF v. United Kingdom thus

"... the dismissal of Mr.Redfearn was not on racial grounds but because the former employer...wished to avoid the perceived deterimental effects of Mr.Redfearn's membership of, and election to office representing thje BNP, which propagated racially discriminatory policies concerning non-white races who form part of (the employer's)workforce and customer base..." This is the definition of racism, so in reply to h2g2Bob's request for a source from higher up the legal hierarchy than a tribunal - here it is. Barnes (one of the 3 members of the "ethnic laison committee" of which onlt Rustem can claim to be "ethnic"- the other being Colin Smith)self desribed the BNP as whites only. I cannot say that Barnes self- described them as racist, but Mummery LJ in his judgement holds that they are. http://www.ier.org.uk/system/files/ASLEF+v+UK+final+for+website+corr+by+jh1.pdf

Also of note from Hendy's article was a quote from British Nationalist 2003 encouraging BNP members to try to join trade unions in order to get thrown out and claim "five figure damages" and to get on the "gravy-train" before the "lefties" got too scared to expel them. This was used by Hendy in the ASLEF case.--Streona (talk) 17:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

History of Royal Navy and their first submarines built by 1901.

edit

Hey Man... I feel that you are completely legit with your "editorial-like" commentary. This account should most certainly be reverted to your last version. "Parsecboy" has removed some very valid and factual information and it should be put right by reverting back to your last version. It is accurate and unbiased and should be included as such --Middim13 (talk) 20:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)208.39.172.53 (talk) 20:01, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Chakrabarti

edit

WP:ANI is probably the way to go. David Underdown (talk) 16:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

April 2009

edit

  Please do not use talk pages such as Shami Chakrabarti for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Nja247 10:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the info. The discussion on the talk page has been removed per the noted policy. Further the ip account you reference has received a block for abuse. Nja247 11:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disruption

edit

It would be possible to protect your user page from being edited by IP users. Based on the level of disruption I'd be prepared to do this for one month if you would like. Nja247 14:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

1066

edit

Hello! I just dropped in to answer your last question on the BNP talkpage. That would have to be either October or December, I guess. See ya! Iago212 13:10, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Cardell Goodman

edit

Cardell (or "Cardonnel") Goodman, known as "Scum" from his University days, was the son of a clergyman also called Cardell Goodman. He was born in.. At the age of three he moved to the Isle of Wight where his father became Vicar of Freshwater,succeeding the father of Robert Hooke. Cardell attended Trinity College Cambridge, obtaining the nickname "Scum" but was sent down for slashing a portrait of the College's Chancellor, the Duke of Monmouth. He made his living an actor until killing a fellow actor with whom he shared a shirt in a dispute over whose turn it was to wear it. Scum then became the lover of the Duchess of Cleveland (or one of them) and attempted to displace her sons as her heir by attempting to poison them. On bering discovered he left for a new career as a highwayman. he was subsequently caught but was pardoned by James II. He repaid the favour by becoming involved in Jacobite plots to restore James -The Assassination Plot of 1695/6 and the Fenwick Plot, to assassinate William III. Sir John Fenwick's wife paid Goodman and his friend Porter not to goive evidence against him in his treason trial. Porter took the money and left the country. Goodman took the money but still gave evidence. However without two witnesses Fenwick was not convicted. Nonetheless a law was passed by Act of Attainder declaring him guilty and he was executed. Goodman fled to Paris where he was supported by English exiles until his death.

Nick Griffin

edit

I reverted your recent edit about immigrants on boats, for two reasons. I'd considered adding the material myself but do not consider the story to have 'played out' yet sufficiently enough to make a worthwhile addition, and secondly because the article is presently at WP:GAN and your reference formatting was inconsistent with that used in the rest of the article.

I don't object to his comments being added, just...not yet. I think it worth waiting a day or two longer, for the story to mature a little, before adding it. What do you think? Parrot of Doom (talk) 13:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh I think its notable enough to go in, but bearing in mind that Griffin quickly corrected the interviewer and said he wanted to sink the boats, not drown their occupants, I thought it might be a story that could benefit from a pause for thought - who knows, it may snowball into something else.
Grub Street is still very much a work in progress. I'm undecided yet whether to concentrate on the geographical aspects, or the use of the term as a description of hacks etc. Parrot of Doom (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Its been my aim since starting work on the article to present as unbiased a piece as I can. When I first encountered it, it was a mess. Personally I can't stand the man. Parrot of Doom (talk) 14:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


PS I just noticed the edit summary listed your contribution as vandalism - I just wanted to apologise for that, it of course wasn't vandalism. Wrong button. Parrot of Doom (talk) 10:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi!

edit

Dear Streona: Please provide a reference to your last edit in Tunicate. Thank you! --Againme (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi again. I'm glad your child is into science! Thanks. Againme (talk) 14:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Incredibly biased

edit

It would be best that you stay away from the BNP article indefinitely due to your seemingly-impossible ability to remain neutral on the subject. DeclaraApollo (talk) 16:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Whites Only

edit

The Equality and Human Rights Commission took an action against the BNP regarding provisions in its constitution to limit eligibilty for membership to "whites only", defined as members of the Anglo-Saxon and Celtic "Folk Communities". The original hearing before Judge Paul Collins in the Central London County Court on 2 September 2009 was adjourned due to the BNP failure to instruct counsel, resulting in the BNP being required to pay eighty thousand pounds in costs. BNP representatives claimed that among the intentions of the EHRC was to bankrupt the party by legal costs. Griffin then circulated membership to explain that that they would be conceding the case since it could cost upto a million pounds to take it to the House of Lords. On 15 October 2009 the BNP agreed before Judge Collins to suspend further membership applications until an Extraordinary General Meeting in January 2010 confirming the changes to the constitution to comply with legal requirements. The case has been further adjourned until 28 January 2010 in ored to ensure compliance.

[2]

I'm not sure I understood what you meant by this... Does that effectively mean you support this edit, or did I read you wrong? Please clarify on talk page, thanks. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 13:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Michal Morey article

edit

Hi, Streona. I was directed to your fascinating article by an Australian Morey with several generations of Isle-of-Wight family history. I've also visited the island recently myself, and used one of my photos in an update of the Quarr Abbey article. While copy-editing (which I hope you'll check over), I found that the Michal Morey piece was surprisingly lacking in authoritative inline sources , though there must be plenty of book references in libraries. The website refs are interesting but not 'official' or historiographically 'reliable' enough for Wikipedia. Do you have the book For Rooks and Ravens? That looks to be the best one referred to in the article. It would be very helpful to have a few inline references to the book instead of only websites, don't you think? Also, if you go over there from time to time, it would be good to have a photo in there, say, of the mound, or the gibbet, or the pub. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 15:49, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kirk Douglas discussion post.

edit

Youv'e left a question on the Kirk Douglas discussion page which must be a joke but if it's not then he needed to earn the money to buy food in the first place, and used what he made in profit to feed himself.92.2.98.165 (talk) 18:15, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of fictional pubs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to The Young Ones, The Long Goodbye, The Wicker Man, Hobson's Choice, Sir Henry at Rawlinson End and Straw Dogs

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of fictional castles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Dark Tower
List of fictional pubs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Austin Powers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply


Pubs of the Isle of Wight,

Pubs on the Isle of Wight

edit

Traditionally most pubs were tied houses and the main local brewery was Mews at Newport and to a lesser extent Burts Ventnor Brewery. Mews was taken over by Strongs, which was latwer taken over by Whitbread. There are many pubs now gone, including the one in Newport where Charles I signed the Treaty of Newport 0f 1648.

Bembridge

edit

Ye Olde Village Inn

The Pilot Boat

The Crab & Lobster

Culver Haven

The Propellor (Bembridge Airport)

Brading

edit

The Bugle

The Red Lion

The Wheatsheaf

The Yarbridge

Cowes

edit

The White Hart

The Ship

The Painter's Arms

Freshwater

edit

The High Down Inn

The Red Lion

Newport

edit

The Bugle

The Castle

St Crispins

The Bargeman's Rest

Ryde

edit

The Simeon Arms

The King Lud

The Marine Bars

The Anglesey Tavern

The Castle

Sandown

edit

The Old Comical

The Jolly Sailor

Scruffy Jack's (on the Pier)

The Driftwood Bar

The Castle

Shanklin

edit

The Falcon

The Crab

Ventnor

edit

The Spyglass

The Crab & Lobster

Yarmouth

edit

The George

The Colwell Bay

Country & Village Pubs

edit

The Fighting Cocks Apse Heath

The White Lion Arreton

The Buddle Inn Blackgang

The Three Bishops Brighstone

The Sun Inn Calbourne

The Wight Mouse Chale

The Griffin Godshill

The Taverners Godshill

The Pointer Newchurch

The Crown Shorwell

The Chequers Rookley

The Hare & Hounds (Downend)

The White Horse Niton

The Horse & Groom Ningwood

The Sportsmans Rest(Porchfield)

The Battery Puckpool

The Folly Inn (River Medina)


The Albion Hotel, Freshwater Bay 01983 755755


The Battery Hotel, Springvale Road, Puckpool, 01983 612188 The Blacksmiths Arms, Calbourne Road, Newport, 01983 529263 The Blenheim, 9 High Street, Ventnor, 01983 853633 The Bonchurch Inn, Bonchurch Shute, Bonchurch, 01983 852611 The Broadway Inn, The Broadway, Totland Bay, 01983 752453 The Bugle Hotel, The Square, Yarmouth, 01983 760272 The Bugle Inn, High Steet, Brading, 01983 407359

The Captain's Cabin, Colwell Bay, 01983 753324 The Cask & Taverners, High Street, Godshill 01983 840707The Cedars Inn, 2 Station Road, Wootton Bridge, 01983 882593 The Central Tap Hotel, High Street, Ventnor, 01983 852473 The Chequers Inn, Niton Road, Rookley, 01983 840314 The Colwell Bay Inn, Colwell Road, Freshwater, 01983 752271 The Countryman, Limerstone Road, Brighstone, 01983 740616 The Crab & Lobster Tap, Grove Road, Ventnor XXXXXXX

The Eight Bells Inn, 31 High Street, Carisbrooke, 01983 825501

The Fat Cat, Sandpipers Hotel, Coastguard Lane, Freshwater Bay 01983 758500 The Fighting Cocks, Hale Common, Arreton, 01983 865254 The Fishbourne Inn, 111 Fishbourne Lane, Fishbourne, 01983 882823


The Highdown Inn, Highdown Lane, Totland, The Horse & Groom, Main Road, Ningwood, 01983 760672

The Kings Head, Quay Street, Yarmouth, 01983 760351

The Mill Bay Hotel, Esplanade, Ventnor, 01983 852892

The New Inn, Shalfleet, 01983 531314

The Old Fort, The Esplanade, Seaview, 01983 612163 The Old Stag Inn, 2 Cowes Road, Newport, 01983 522709

The Pilot Boat Inn, Station Road, Bembridge, 01983 872077 The Pointer Inn, High Street, Newchurch, 01983 865202 The Prince of Wales, Princes Road, Freshwater, 01983 753535 The Propeller Inn, Bembridge Airport, Bembridge, 01983 873611

The Red Lion Inn, Church Place, Freshwater, 01983 754925 The Roadside Inn, Nettlestone Green, Nettlestone, 01983 616969 The Royal Standard Hotel, 15 School Green Road, Freshwater, 01983 753227

The St Lawrence Inn, St Lawrence, 01983 ...... The Seaview Hotel, High Street, Seaview, 01983 612711 The Sloop Inn, Wootton Bridge, 01983 882544 The Sportsmans Rest, Main Road, Porchfield, 01983 522044 The Spyglass Inn, Esplanade, Ventnor, 01983 855338 or 852775 The Sun Inn, Sun Hill, Calbourne, 01983 521321 The Sun Inn, Hulverstone, 01983 741124

The Terminus, 1 Mitchell Avenue, Ventnor, 01983 856348 The Three Bishops, Main Road, Brighstone, 01983 740226 The Travellers Joy, 89 Pallance Road, Cowes, 01983 298024

The Village Inn, Bembridge, 01983 ...... The Vine Inn, Avenue Road, Freshwater, 01983 752959 The Volunteer Inn, 30 Victoria Street, Ventnor, 01983 852537

The Waterfront, The Promenade, Totland Bay, 01983 756969 The Waverley Hotel, 2 Clatterford Road, Carisbrooke, 01983 522338 The Wheatsheaf Inn, Bridge Road, Yarmouth, 01983 760456 The White Horse Inn, High Street, Whitwell, 01983 825501 The White Lion Inn, High Street, Niton, 01983 730293 The Windmill Inn, Bembridge, 01983 ...... The Winter Gardens & Bell Bar, Pier Road, Ventnor, 01983 855215 The Wishing Well, Pondwell Hill, Ryde, 01983 613222 The Woodmans Arms, 119 Station Road, Wootton Bridge, 01983 882785 The Worsley Arms, High Street, Wroxall, 01983 853144

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Kings of the Isle of Wight, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ealhmund and Aethelwulf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lego The Lord of the Rings for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lego The Lord of the Rings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego The Lord of the Rings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 08:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Lego The Lord of the Rings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haldir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Emilie Mover

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emilie Mover requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Patchy1 23:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Emilie Mover

edit

Hello, Streona. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Emilie Mover, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, heather walls (talk) 02:53, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Emilie Mover for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emilie Mover is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilie Mover until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. besiegedtalk 23:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Birth place of Valentine Greatrakes

edit

Please see Talk:Valentine_Greatrakes#Birthplace -- PBS (talk) 16:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited War crime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boughton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Poplar Rate Rebellion Mural

edit

Is the link I added suitable for your purposes?

Have you come across [3]? Jackiespeel (talk) 14:29, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edmund Berry Godfrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Francis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Onel5969 (talk) 16:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Streona, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 16:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Streona. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Staplers

edit
 

The article Staplers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references since 2011. It's original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 20:44, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Staplers for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Staplers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staplers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:20, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Streona. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Morton, Isle of Wight

edit
 

The article Morton, Isle of Wight has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGEO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 14:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arwald, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Newport and Longstone. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 14 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Culture of the Isle of Wight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champs.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply