March 2012

edit

  Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 18:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:Jurisdictions

edit

Category:Jurisdictions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 09:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. St John Chrysostom Δόξατω Θεώ 02:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:Margraves of Greece

edit

Category:Margraves of Greece, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 21:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Dukes of Greece

edit

Category:Dukes of Greece, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 21:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Line of succession to the French throne (Bonapartist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrKiernan (talk) 17:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Salut!-mobile listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Salut!-mobile. Since you had some involvement with the Salut!-mobile redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Peerage of the United Kingdom

edit
 

Category:Peerage of the United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Alekksandr (talk) 19:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Stijn Calle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Adrien, Count de Rougé listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Adrien, Count de Rougé. Since you had some involvement with the Adrien, Count de Rougé redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Apostolic nuncios has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Apostolic nuncios, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 14:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Counts of Aalst has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Counts of Aalst, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Counts of Brussels has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Counts of Brussels, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:53, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Roman Catholic Personal Prelates has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Roman Catholic Personal Prelates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Stijn Calle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Prince-Bishops of the Holy Roman Empire has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Prince-Bishops of the Holy Roman Empire, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:00, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Barons of Marbot

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Barons of Marbot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:LaSaletteCross3.jpg

edit
 

The file File:LaSaletteCross3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Princes Bonaparte

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Princes Bonaparte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Croÿ has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Croÿ has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Princes of Vidin

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Princes of Vidin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Princes of Panagiurishte

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Princes of Panagiurishte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Noble titles of the county of Edessa

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Noble titles of the county of Edessa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Noble titles of the county of Tripoli

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Noble titles of the county of Tripoli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nobility of the county of Edessa

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Nobility of the county of Edessa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nobility of the county of Tripoly

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Nobility of the county of Tripoly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Princes of Rougé

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Princes of Rougé requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Noble titles of Andorra has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Noble titles of Andorra has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 00:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Titles of nobility by nationality has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Titles of nobility by nationality has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 00:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Kings of Naples has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Kings of Naples has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:12, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Nobility of the United Kingdom has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Nobility of the United Kingdom has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 16:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Angelic Pope" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Angelic Pope and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 13#Angelic Pope until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 10:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Hechingen Wappen.gif

edit
 

The file File:Hechingen Wappen.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Stadtwappen Hechingen.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Counts of Mailly

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Counts of Mailly indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Prince-bishoprics of Livonia has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Prince-bishoprics of Livonia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:17, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Counts of Canossa

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Counts of Canossa indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:House of la Marche has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:House of la Marche has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 23:20, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Landgraves of Brabant has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Landgraves of Brabant has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Counts of Ternois has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Counts of Ternois has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Counts of Egmond has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Counts of Egmond has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Lords of Sint-Aldegonde has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Lords of Sint-Aldegonde has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dukes of Villeroi

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Dukes of Villeroi indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:09, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Counts of Plessis-Praslin

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Counts of Plessis-Praslin indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:47, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Counts of Italy has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Counts of Italy has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Counts of Germany has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Counts of Germany has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 23:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:German titles of nobility has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:German titles of nobility has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Marquesses of Grenade

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Marquesses of Grenade indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 16 § Category:Noble titles by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 17:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Gerulfingian dynasty has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Gerulfingian dynasty has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:31, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Noblemen has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Noblemen has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Noblemen of France has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Noblemen of France has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fézensac family has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Fézensac family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lists of swiss noble titles

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of swiss noble titles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Pretenders to the Austrian throne has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Pretenders to the Austrian throne has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 18:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Pretenders to the Albanian throne has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Pretenders to the Albanian throne has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 08:50, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Knights of Chaumont has been nominated for splitting

edit
 

Category:Knights of Chaumont has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Knights of Boufflers has been nominated for splitting

edit
 

Category:Knights of Boufflers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Barons of Austria has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Barons of Austria has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Barons of Belgium has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Barons of Belgium has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Barons of France has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Barons of France has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Barons in Italy has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Barons in Italy has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Barons of Luxembourg has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Barons of Luxembourg has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Barons of the Netherlands has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Barons of the Netherlands has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Barons of Portugal has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Barons of Portugal has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Barons of Spain has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:Barons of Spain has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Princes of Venice has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Princes of Venice has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:16, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply