Steve157
Your recent edits
edit
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Res 242
editHi. Saw you have a discussion with my friend Nableezy. When I set myself free from the Gaza War, I'll go there to clean up the stables. In the meantime, I encourage you to visit my user page - I threw there some most relevant stuff considering the res. --Sceptic from Ashdod (talk) 05:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Have a look at the ref I added in the land for peace section. It supports the argument you're making on the talk page. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 18:11, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I was exactly working on two section of that resolution. As for your post, if you have a specific edit in mind, that you believe that I made some obviously error, you can revert it with a simple edit summary. However, if your intention is to revert everything, I would prefer that we start with discussion and revert/change on a need base. If you point out the particular edit that concern you, I'll be happy to expand on the reason behind them.(I'll wait with further changes for now)--Mor2 (talk) 01:11, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- I am afraid most of them do. Can we talk in the article and perhaps you could explain your largest deletion as a starter. Steve157 (talk) 01:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Stable version is not an 'obviously error' and some of the edits you reverted are technical dealing with readability/navigation. Which is why asked you not revert everything, but point out the particular edit of concern to you. Regardless, I have posted the first bunch of the edits you reverted (inorder) on the talk page. Unlike the later edits I think they self explanatory and simple to address. I'll be waiting for your feedback. --Mor2 (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- I have given it on the article page. Steve157 (talk) 10:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- What about the changes to the lead #7 [1]. I believe we are out of the technical stuff and getting to the intriguing part ;) --Mor2 (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Mor2, you seem to want to get on with the lead so I'll go with the Preamble introduction both Dailycare and I agree. Do you want to start a new section in 242 talk and propose your first change to the lead? Steve157 (talk) 00:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- yes, I started it so we can focus on it.--Mor2 (talk) 20:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Mor2, you seem to want to get on with the lead so I'll go with the Preamble introduction both Dailycare and I agree. Do you want to start a new section in 242 talk and propose your first change to the lead? Steve157 (talk) 00:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- What about the changes to the lead #7 [1]. I believe we are out of the technical stuff and getting to the intriguing part ;) --Mor2 (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- I have given it on the article page. Steve157 (talk) 10:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Stable version is not an 'obviously error' and some of the edits you reverted are technical dealing with readability/navigation. Which is why asked you not revert everything, but point out the particular edit of concern to you. Regardless, I have posted the first bunch of the edits you reverted (inorder) on the talk page. Unlike the later edits I think they self explanatory and simple to address. I'll be waiting for your feedback. --Mor2 (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)