StaticGull

Welcome! Indications:

• “Sign” (~~~~) new messages — Unsigned messages will be reverted.

• Choose a headline for new messages ( == == ). New messages without headlines will be reverted.
• In order to keep discussions together and not to lose track it's important only to talk at one place:

• If I started a discussion on your talk page, please anwer there and not here.
• If you left me a message on my talk page (here), I'll answer here.
• Please use the {{Talkback|your username}} template to alert me of new responses; I'll do the same

• Please write new messages at the bottom of this page or use this link.

Thanks for paying attention to the preceding indications. :-).

StaticGull  Talk 

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader =

|maxarchivesize = 1000K |counter = 11

sry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.69.23.242 (talk) 04:45, 9 August 2011

Idiots

Hello. Your recent message on my profile Purposefully vandalising your site is incorrect. My comments are constructive and with the simpsons this is a true comment. Pillows have often been used in the ways I have mentioned. I have not disrupted this site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrRedAnon (talk • contribs) 22:21, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I'm afraid the edit you're referring to seems to constitute original research. Although this seems to be the case for your facts about pillows too, it was ClueBot who reverted your edit. Happy editing! StaticGull  Talk  20:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Facing Jihad Conference

The article Facing Jihad Conference has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Few references in reliable sources, and those references are trivial.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

hey staticgull

i got a message about vandalizing a honda integra page? i've never ever viewed that page so i'm unsure what this is about? could I have been hacked perhaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.182.38.84 (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/June 30 2008

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/June 30 2008, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/June 30 2008 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/June 30 2008 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:23, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Yowani Choctaws

I find it interesting that a page about a legitimate historical group that has been there for about 10 years is still listed for deletion. The data is present, I do not know all who have edited it over the years, but although there is info I have never came across, not did I see a reference, it is still consistent with these people, their migrations and current status both in Oklahoma and Texas. So, unless this is a very old message, I am perplexed. While I had created quite a number of pages 8-12 years ago, but have done nothing since, until just recently. Also, while not trying to make excuses, but I have no choice, due to health issues, 3 heart surgeries, etc., my ability to comprehend how to connect, to ask questions and make changes possible, are somewhat beyond me. For that I apologize. As an example for the life of me I cannot figure out how to add photos. I have several that would deal with the Yowani Choctaw page and the Mount Tabor Indian Community page I recently created, albeit quite backwards. When this page was first done there was little data about contemporary Yowani descendants in Texas or Oklahoma. Other than the historians Martini and Mooney, there just wasn't much without digging in libraries which I was no longer physically capable of.

In any event deletion of this page, if that is still on the burner, will prompt me to fight for it in anyway open to me. I will not tolerate discrimination eve by other Indians because they have not heard of Yowani's. This is just wrong. Again, since I am jut finding all this out, duh, I apologize for not comprehending what needs to be done. All HELP is greatly appreciated and I know when I created this page in 2008, a very nice person (not a clue who they are now) offered t take it and run with it, They did and I have left it alone until the last week or so.

Thank you ````Terran57Terran57 (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Yowani Choctaws-DUH

I apologize for the deletion statement was several years ago. I don't know any of the other people connected with altering it. :-) I have got soooooo much to learn again. Thank all for patience.

````Terran57```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terran57 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Dexter's Laboratory: Mandorks Laboratory? listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dexter's Laboratory: Mandorks Laboratory?. Since you had some involvement with the Dexter's Laboratory: Mandorks Laboratory? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 14:16, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

"Xbox threehundredandsixty" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xbox threehundredandsixty. Since you had some involvement with the Xbox threehundredandsixty redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 15:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Fitna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fitna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fitna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 05:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)