Stagememories

Stagememories, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Stagememories! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Stagememories, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Copyright status of your pottery photo

I really feel bad about this, but I fear that your photo of the Fairyland piece may violate Robinson's copyright. In my opinion, copyright law is a horrible mess, grossly weighted in favor of corporations pretending to "protect" creative people, but Wikipedia is bound by the law. A picture of a 3D object has two separate creative components. First, any copyright that may apply to the object itself, and then a copyright in the "derived work" (the photo) which is held by the photographer. Thus, you claim of "own work" applies to the derived work, but does not cancel the copyright on the Fairyland images, which is held by whoever Robinson assigned them to. Yuck.

By contrast, should you choose to photograph just the registered mark, there is no "creative element" in that portion of the 3D object, and you would own the photo's copyright.

Since I hate this entire mess, I will take no action to raise this issue on Wikimedia Commons. -Arch dude (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

UPDATE: I'm used to US law (anything after 1924 is still under copyright.) UK copyright law appears to say that copyright on works like that mug expires 70 years after the death of its creator, so Robinson's copyright expired in 1944+70=2014. You are OK for the Fairyland images. I think we can ignore the copyright in the "creative element" of the actual shape of the mug on the grounds that the shape is not creative enough to bother with, but if you want to get pedantic, copyright for a anonymous or corporate creator expires 70 years after the production of the piece. Technically, you should update the commons description page: Don't bother unless someone contests your description. -Arch dude (talk) 18:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)