Shamgal15

Your draft article, Draft:Leelavathi Govindasamy

Hello, Shamgal15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leelavathi Govindasamy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 12:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leelavathi Govindasamy (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iamfarzan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leelavathi Govindasamy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leelavathi Govindasamy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Iamfarzan (talk) 02:42, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Shamgal15! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Iamfarzan (talk) 02:42, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Shamgal15, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Iamfarzan (talk) 04:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello, Shamgal15! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Iamfarzan (talk) 04:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Leelavathi Govindasamy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Leelavathi Govindasamy. Thanks! Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leelavathi Govindasamy has been accepted

Leelavathi Govindasamy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 21:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Relatives in infobox

The names of children and most relatives only go in the infobox only if they are independently notable (have their own articles). This is stated in the infobox documentation: "Number of children (e.g., 3), or list of independently notable names". The infobox is for "key" information about a person, a quick summary of the most important facts in the article. Names of children do not normally qualify. MB 22:09, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Dear MB, you claim that the names have to be independently notable. However, there are many pages which carry the children’s and relatives names whereby they are not notable people. Eg. One such page is Janaky Athi Nahappan. If it applies for one how come it does not apply for many others. Shamgal15 (talk) 15:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

It is not my "claim", it is project consensus. There certainly are many pages that don't follow the consensus and should be updated. I have removed the names from Janaky Athi Nahappan also. MB 16:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification Shamgal15 (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have been told we don't list non-notable relatives in the infobox. MB 03:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)