Shamelessshahbag
Welcome Shamelessshahbag!
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Inappropriate usernames
editYour user name violets WP:IU policy and seems WP:SPA. Please try to contribute on wikipedia with WP:Good Faith.--Freemesm (talk) 03:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- "Shameless Shahbag" - it reveals the user's point of view, but violating IU, really? Hardly "offensive or disruptive", unless your name is Shahbag. I would suggest leaving new editors alone until they actually do something wrong. Applesandapples (talk) 09:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with A&A Crtew (talk) 11:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Crtew, I don't expect this kind of opinion from a knowledgeable wikipedian like you. Activity of this account clearly shows that it is created only for biasing 2013 Shahbag protests related article, so it is a WP:SPA. Please encourage newbies to be decent, rather than to be a vandal.--Freemesm (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Fine, turn me in first for only working almost entirely on journalists and call me single-minded. And then turn yourself in for working on a similar set of articles. I think you're making a mountain out of a mole hill. Sorry, that's colloquial. You're making a big deal out of nothing. Crtew (talk) 14:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- I can't get your point. Say something about this WP:IUvio article.--Freemesm (talk) 15:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Fine, turn me in first for only working almost entirely on journalists and call me single-minded. And then turn yourself in for working on a similar set of articles. I think you're making a mountain out of a mole hill. Sorry, that's colloquial. You're making a big deal out of nothing. Crtew (talk) 14:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Crtew, I don't expect this kind of opinion from a knowledgeable wikipedian like you. Activity of this account clearly shows that it is created only for biasing 2013 Shahbag protests related article, so it is a WP:SPA. Please encourage newbies to be decent, rather than to be a vandal.--Freemesm (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with A&A Crtew (talk) 11:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Your message
editSS, please make an entry under that talk page to record the fact that you placed the neutrality template and it was removed. I'll contact an editor who can do something more than either you or I can. Crtew (talk) 11:41, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Shamelessshahbag, you are invited to the Teahouse
edit
|
Hi Shamelessshahbag! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |