Blogtalkradio
editA tag has been placed on Blogtalkradio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RJASE1 Talk 03:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of EDrugSearch.com
edit
A tag has been placed on EDrugSearch.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Pip (talk) 15:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
COI
editHi Sbaradell. It appears to me that you are likely to have a conflict of interest in the creation of some or all of your articles. To the extent that any of the articles you have created relate to your company or its clients, I would urge you to request their deletion and wait for others to contribute articles on these topics--even if you have not said anything untrue about them. If they are truly notable, it's just a matter of time before a bona fide other editor will create them. Bongomatic (talk) 22:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
I stand by the quality and neutral point of view of the listing. I question how "someone" has posted a thin rationale on LegitScript's Wikipedia entry explaining how it is worthy of inclusion, while you challenge the author of the eDrugSearch.com entry and dismiss a long list of citations as somehow not newsworthy.
I can provide whatever information you require to clearly demonstrate the bias in supporting a LegitScript entry but not an eDrugSearch.com entry; what information would you like? Suggesting that a mere NABP endorsement qualifies a new Web site for a Wikipedia entry, while attempting to deny a leading online opponent of NABP's pro-Big Pharma politics its own entry, would be a clear case of bias -- whether intentional or not. I've been editing on Wikipedia since 2004 with the highest level of professionalism and respect for what Wikipedia does. Something about this challenge to a legitimate Wikipedia entry smells fishy to me.
Your recent edits
editHi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of EDrugSearch.com
edit I have nominated EDrugSearch.com, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDrugSearch.com. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Bongomatic (talk) 01:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Bongomatic (talk) 01:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Burns (newspaper columnist)
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Scott Burns (newspaper columnist), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Edwardx (talk) 15:26, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
A belated welcome!
edit
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sbaradell! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! — Newslinger talk 03:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)