SaugusXEntertainment
Speedy deletion nomination of User:SaugusXEntertainment
editA tag has been placed on your user page, User:SaugusXEntertainment, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:55, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page is not unambiguously promotional, because this page is not for promotion, it is a description of our community. The community will come together to discuss films and music. Please leave us notes on anything you think is a violation of your guidelines and we will fix it. SaugusXEntertainment (talk)
Conflict of interest
editHello, SaugusXEntertainment. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 05:07, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Blocked
editNovember 2021
edit
You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
- Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
reblocked
edit@Athaenara: Hello, I reblocked per SPAMU for promotional username and promotional edits. I accidentally restored TPA, but I'd like them to have that to request an unblock. I have provided them with educational material via UTRS appeal #50314 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: I added that because he'd already used this page to spam for his company. If he does it again it can always be withdrawn again. Also, judging from a message he posted elsewhere, he's unlikely ever to have an interest in contributing to the encyclopedia in a non-exploitative way – Athaenara ✉ 07:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Athaenara: Thanks. Too true. @SaugusXEntertainment: Please understand that 1) you are not to write about your company-- especially on your user talk page, and 2) the only use you have for your talk page right now is to address the reasons for your block. Oh, almost forgot. Please clarify your relationship with/to DJX Kbrokaysen. That raises the question of sock puppetry. Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: See my talk page reply. Just another sockpuppet account trying the same old stuff under a new username. I've tagged their userpage accordingly. -- Longhair\talk 16:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- last night I heard the sound of quacking // thought this user could use a whacking. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Annnnd, as this is a sock, I will change to a sock puppet block and strike the SPAMU block, as a rename would only cloud matters and the user is not eligible to be renamed. @SaugusXEntertainment: Please seek unblock on your original account. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- last night I heard the sound of quacking // thought this user could use a whacking. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: See my talk page reply. Just another sockpuppet account trying the same old stuff under a new username. I've tagged their userpage accordingly. -- Longhair\talk 16:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
November 2021
editThis account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC) |