Satiksme
|
Deo Volente
editAre you one of Jehovah's Witnesses? Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 10:15, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Article 12 of the ECHR
editWas this edit of mine correct? I'm far from knowledgeable about this, but thought the original wording sounded odd when five EU countries allow SSMs. Thought I'd leave you a note, anyway. :) AllynJ (talk | contribs) 20:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- I've meant that Austria's ban of SSM was found not to violate the European Convention - not that the Court would impose the same attitude to other countries.Satiksme (talk) 20:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, I get you - are you happy with the current wording? I think it's a bit clearer in what it means. Or do you think we should switch it to something like "bans of same-sex marriages on a national level are permitted"? Or don't you mind? :) AllynJ (talk | contribs) 20:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- As the relevant section of the article lists cases of limitations to marriage, found contrary to Convention or not, I feel a need to re-phrase the current wording somehow, like "lack of recognition of SSM" Satiksme (talk) 20:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, I get you - are you happy with the current wording? I think it's a bit clearer in what it means. Or do you think we should switch it to something like "bans of same-sex marriages on a national level are permitted"? Or don't you mind? :) AllynJ (talk | contribs) 20:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ajbpearce (talk) 15:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Committee against Torture
editCategory:Members of the Committee against Torture, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 05:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Proposal to rename categories
editPlease see my proposal to speedily rename Category: Ministers of Army of Japan and Category: Ministers of the Navy of Japan. Hugo999 (talk) 03:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Satiksme. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Satiksme. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Satiksme. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)