Sanjiv swarup

Hello

I am commenting after a long time. I live in Mumbai Best Regards, Sanjiv swarup (talk) 00:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I see you started your account here in 2004! But did not do any edits for a looo...ooong time, becoming somewhat active only in March this year! That's interesting. Where do you stay now? Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

sugest archiving this sub section Sanjiv swarup (talk) 10:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

talk pages and uk taxation

Hi you moved my comment here. [1] . I am not sure if this was your intention or not. It is considered bad practice to move other users talk entries. See WP:TALK for guidelines, in particular WP:TALK#Others.27 comments.

I was commenting on the need to split Taxation in the United Kingdom. Both Morpph and I have suggested expanding the main article Taxation in the United Kingdom first before splitting into a smaller articles. See Wikipedia:Summary style for how this works. GameKeeper 15:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I did see your UK income tax . In my view this is NOT the best way to proceed. the best way would be to expand Taxation in the United Kingdom under the income tax section. Eventually the article will become large enough to be split up at which point Wikipedia:Summary style can be applied. Do you agree? WP:Size gives details of what is expected of article sizes. By splitting the article they way you have much of the information is in 2 separate articles , this is known as content forking and is to be avoided. GameKeeper 16:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

sugest archiving this sub section : it is old and complete Sanjiv swarup (talk) 06:29, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Edeskonline

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Edeskonline, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. GameKeeper 20:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Sanjiv swarup 05:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Wiki is the most modern way of peer review . All the components and linkages of this article are genuine. I have personally tried out edeskonline. edeskonline has already been featured on several wiki articles / comparative articles. I therefore feel that this article is appropriate.

You want to include it because it is mentioned in other places in Wikipedia? This is NOT enough to make it noteable . See Wikipedia:Attribution/FAQ#Types_of_source_material for suitable sources. GameKeeper 06:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

UK income tax

Hi. I've noticed your change to Taxation in the United Kingdom which states you've "moved income tax info to an existing article". As a matter of urgency, could you identify that existing article by placing {{main|name of new article}} just below the Income Tax header in Taxation in the United Kingdom. I've been unable to find the new article you refer to. See Tax for some examples of this in use. from Winklethorpe

done: the name of the article is Income Tax Act 1842 Sanjiv swarup 10:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Secondly, I'm a bit concerned by the move, and a couple of other people have previously commented they they feel it could be premature. It may be best to start a discussion of it in order to build a consensus - explain how you plan to expand on uk income tax so that it warrants a separate article. from Winklethorpe

++ The previous comments were when an entirely new article was created. Now, an independent article titled "Income Tax Act 1842" has been merged. In this manner, the history of the legislation along with the provisions are now available to any reader. Responses have come in with a good summary of current provisions. (please refer to the discussion page). Furthermore, a approximate tax planning scenario is planned to be shown. from Winklethorpe

Thanks Sanjiv swarup 10:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

On a minor point, you don't need to ~~~~ in edit summaries, only in talk pages. Winklethorpe 08:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC) noted with thanks Sanjiv swarup 10:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Sanjiv swarup for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. GameKeeper 15:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Split of UK income tax

You seem to have ignored my previous comment and that of other editors here and here, NOT to split the Taxation in the United Kingdom and have split it for a second time. Please do not work against Consensus GameKeeper 16:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by using sockpuppets to vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edeskonline.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. --Akhilleus (talk) 00:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sanjiv swarup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As a user of several years standing, I disagree with the conclusion

Decline reason:

No reason given for unblocking. — Yamla 15:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocking these users will be unfair to them. Sanjiv swarup 14:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Your Userpage Deleted as Advertising

Your userpage is not to be used as advertising or as a pseudo-article. It is available for personal information about yourself. When adding personal information please remember that Wikipedia is not MySpace. Your userpage is for anything that is compatible with the Wikipedia project. It is a mistake to think of it as a homepage: Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site. Please see Wikipedia:Introduction and Wikipedia:User page for more information. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 16:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not change my talk page entries.

here you changed what I said, I consider this extremely rude. Can you please undo this change or do you agree that I can undo this? GameKeeper (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

noted: Sanjiv swarup (talk) 01:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Red links

Hello Sanjiv,

I see you've been removing a lot of red links recently. Sometimes it's right to remove red links, but normally it's right to keep them. If the article might be created in the future, the red link should be retained to prompt people to create articles, and to make sure that when the article is created it's already linked from all the right places. Have a look at WP:REDLINK for a discussion about this. Thanks,

Stephen Turner (Talk) 10:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

noted: in future , i shall first mention it in the discussion page

Sanjiv swarup (talk) 01:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Edeskonline

Hello, you seem keen to add references to eDeskOnline into wikipedia. Do you have a commercial interest in eDeskOnline? GameKeeper (talk) 12:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I use eDeskOnline for keeping all my information handy. I fancy myself as a missionary for in-the-cloud-computing which I think is the future of productivity. Other areas of my interest is Direct Marketing.

recent edit removed content

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Direct mail. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chris the speller (talk) 01:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

noted: in future , i shall first mention it in the discussion page

Sanjiv swarup (talk) 01:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Online Office/Archive 1

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Online Office/Archive 1, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Online Office/Archive 1 is a test page.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Online Office/Archive 1, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

suggest archiving this sub section Sanjiv swarup (talk) 00:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Archive For non important edit comments

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ged UK (talk) 11:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Web desktop/Archive For non important edit comments

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. The Llama! (talk) 13:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Cloud computing

Thanks for your contributions to the talk page. I've spent the last days overhauling the article and I hope you are more satisfied with the article now. Feel free to contribute yourself. samj (talk) 08:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

• Hi there, thanks for your contributions. I have reverted some of the more recent ones because there was a duplicate 'architecture' section and a new companies section that would become a spam trap. I have instead revealed the section comments in this edit. I hope that is something like what you had in mind. I also noticed you added two companies, one of which I have never heard of. Let's keep the examples to a small number (3-4) which best illustrate cloud computing. samj (talk) 07:17, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Direct Marketing Association India

A tag has been placed on Direct Marketing Association India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TallNapoleon (talk) 20:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

doen the needfull Sanjiv swarup (talk) 00:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Edeskonline

Sanjiv, please stop attempting to add promotional material for eDeskonline. Enough is enough. You will be blocked if you persist. Kuru ^talk 03:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru ^talk 13:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:UN_speech.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:UN_speech.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Archiving of Talk:Office suite to Talk:Office suite/Archive 1

Hi. I've had a go at tidying up this archive. Hopefully I've not missed anything important. --Trevj (talk) 09:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sanjiv swarup. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sanjiv swarup. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Freshworks (formerly Freshdesk)

Hello, Sanjiv swarup. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Freshworks (formerly Freshdesk), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)