User talk:Salvio giuliano/Archive 61

Archive 55

←

Archive 59

Archive 60

Archive 61

Archive 62

Archive 63

→

Archive 65

Tatars

You may recall some time ago there was one Slovenian IP user who continually edit-warred in outdated terminology from the era of scientific racism into the Tatars article against talkpage consensus, provoking a rangeblock and semi-protection. These measures, however, have failed to deter this behaviour. Now he has created an account, XYellowBananaX (talk · contribs), and is continuing the very same shenanigans [1] [2]. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 19:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Indeffed for tendentious editing; I apologise for the delay in responding... Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 19:39, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Rope

"I am willing to consider" does not necessarily mean "I am willing to consider and think there is a good likelihood that I will accept". In fact, it may sometimes mean something more like "I am willing to hear from you, and consider what you say, but, in light of what I have seen so far, it seems very likely that anything you say will just confirm that the present situation is correct". There is, I think, no harm in giving someone a chance to demonstrate their innocence, on the off chance that they will succeed in doing so, even when that seems unlikely. I am also intrigued to know if the user will be able to give any answer at all to question 3. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

I see. Thanks for the note! Regarding question 3, all his socks were tagged, so he was probably be referring to that... Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 13:18, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

• Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles

• News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance

• WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun

• Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes

• In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry

• Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 03:40, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your ideas

Thank you for the information and links. My main concern is the edit revert and *block* of content by the administrator. Can I not appeal both? Right, I get that from what Sandstein says (he's also been very helpful with this stuff) appeals of warnings are not favored. Do you think I should just drop that from the appeal request? I'm not trying to cover the content dispute as a whole, only in the very narrow scope taht Fut.Perf.'s made special findings and editorial decisions about consensus and placing a revert and block on the article's infobox result. I'd be glad to not have any additional part in the infobox matter. What I object to is the lack of level playing field resulting from a couple particular special findings about content that Fut.Perf. made. Especially offensive was his editorial decision about a non-existent consensus which other users besides myself, including one who was supposed to have been part of the alleged consensus, deny. No evidence was ever presented about a consensus, and the only reason I bring it up here is Fut.Perf. made a special finding about that exact issue, I think a very unjust one that violates WP policy. Paavo273 (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC

Thanks for the clarification, Paavo. I have posted a follow-up on the case page. Cheers. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Question

Would you happen to know the link to the India caste discretionary sanctions boiler plate & were to log them please. And do these sanctions cover all article spaced in which castes are covered? Darkness Shines (talk) 10:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

The sanctions cover a wider array of pages: all pages about social groups, be they castes, communities, tribes, clans, kootams, gotras etc., explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.. The log of sanctions is here, though, so far, it has been customary not to log warnings. And here's the template: {{subst:Uw-castewarning}}. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

So content on rape culture in India which would obviously include castes are covered by this? Darkness Shines (talk) 14:18, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Uhm, no, I'd say that said article is not covered under WP:Castes, but, the part being edit warred in and out is probably covered under WP:ARBIPA. Please note, however, that this is just my opinion and that I'm not speaking with my Arb hat on. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:25, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Rephrase needed

Your comment "I agree with you that we should reword the template and its documentation so that it's less clear." didn't come out quite right (I hope). NE Ent 13:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

D'oh. You're right: that was a weird lapsus! Thanks for the message... Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 13:16, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Another User: Mauricio93 sock

Hi Salvio

Another User: Mauricio93 sock has apparently reared its head: User: Mewakery2013. - MrX 14:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Mewakery2013 and Keriyu20 blocked and tagged. Thanks. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, and sorry, but there seems to be a new one: Koryanc21. - MrX 23:39, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Yep, that was confirmed as well. I see that he has already been blocked, though... That said, I ran a check for sleepers and there appears to be none. Cheers. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 13:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Another

Bolivia200 created 2019 Special Olympics World Summer Games. - MrX 16:18, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

and probably 181.156.243.61 working in concert on the same article. - MrX 16:21, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

The named account is confirmed (and has been blocked); the privacy policy, unfortunately, prevents me from commenting on the IP... Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 17:01, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

• One more, I'm afraid: Chinesa21. I have updated the SPI case that I reopened this morning. - MrX 21:44, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Indeed, the account is confirmed. Also, thanks for updating the SPI case. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 22:56, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

• A new sock, same article creation pattern: Honduras2002. - MrX 02:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Blocked and tagged. The unfortunate thing is that this socker keeps jumping from one range to the next, making an effective rangeblock difficult to impose... Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
• And another: User:USA974 - MrX 17:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Yay... Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 17:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
• Here we go again: KOF98. - MrX 13:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Blocked and tagged. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
• Greetings. Here's another Mauricio80 sock: Japanse90 and it's little IP duckling 181.149.168.120. I also logged at SPI. - MrX 18:56, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Possible Sock

Steals (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
MalesAlwaysBest (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
ChronicalUsual (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Sopher99 (talk) 13:11, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Actually, it was MAB. Steals, Bespirden and Vajazzled blocked and tagged. Cheers. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 13:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

• Op-ed: An article is a construct – hoaxes and Wikipedia

• Featured content: A lousy week

• WikiProject report: Just the Facts

• In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute

• News and notes: UK chapter governance review marks the end of a controversial year

• Discussion report: WebCite proposal

• Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 09:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Good article criteria

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Good article criteria. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

• WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines

• Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit

• In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press

• Featured content: Featured content gets schooled

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 20:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JoshuSasori for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. elvenscout742 (talk) 01:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Obviously you aren't under investigation yourself. Just I mentioned your name in my comment and I figured I should let you know. If you want to post a comment I'm sure it would be welcome! elvenscout742 (talk) 01:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Do not create hoaxes

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Do not create hoaxes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Sock?

Don Jovany (talk · contribs) appears to be a throwaway account created for the sole purpose of reverting a map change showing advances made by the Syrian rebels. There's also something.... chronically usual about the name as well. Not much diff evidence to go off of here, but something smells a bit fishy. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi there. Salvio is presently inactive, so it is unlikely he will respond promptly to your concerns. You might like to try WP:SPI instead. Regards, AGK [•] 09:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

There's little to go on in terms of diff evidence here—this is mostly a sort of know-it-when-you-see-it thing which comes from dealing with a certain sockmaster long enough to understand their behaviour. I'm not sure if it'll be accepted at SPI. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

• In the media: Ex-WMF trustee creates "Wikipedia Corporate Index" for PR agency

• Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers

• News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year

• Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization

• Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'

• WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload

• Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 07:25, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Possible Socks

ChronicalUsual (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Deonis_2012 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Don_Jovany (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Sopher99 (talk) 17:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, now that he's been mucking around some more, he looks a lot more like Deonis. Salvio looks to be out for a while, so I'll take it to SPI. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 01:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed. User:Dennys 2012 and User:Don Jovany 2007 also confirmed for Deonis. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 18:02, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Creation block of Thiyyar

Hi Salvio. I have been trying to get a hold of Bwilkins (another admin) for a while and have not been able to get a response, so I thought you might be able to help. Below is the message I left on his talk page roughly two weeks ago.

"I have been working in AfC for a while now and I came across a new version of Thiyyar, an article that was deleted in April 2012 following what appears to be a very heated discussion on the topic. Since I know little about castes in India, I asked the editor who created the article to elaborate on the subject, and this was his response:

Hi Freebirds, Thiyya is a different caste from Ezhava, the only common thing between these two groups that they belong to Other Backward Communities in India. Thiyya has got different culture and history. I had a look ezhava wikipedia page and found many errors. Thiyyar is independent and they got their own culture and even they look different from Ezhava people. This link is from a book would tell you the difference, Thiyya people mainly living in Malabar in Kerala state. and Ezhava is living in Travancore region in Kerala. There are many links in my wikipedia article describing about thiyya. Thanks for your help and highly appreciated. Please send a message to the administrator to get my article published.

I told him/her that I would ask an administrator about the block if I had a valid reason to contest it, yet the fact remains that I am no expert on the subject by any means. Can an unblock be made for this user's article? The AfC version of the article can be found here and the AfD discussion from the April 2012 deletion of the article can be found here. Also, if you would like to see the entire conversation between myself and the editor, please see my talk page. Cheers, Freebirds Howdy! 6:41 am, 19 February 2013, Tuesday (14 days ago) (UTC−6)"

If you can help me with the unblock in any way it would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, Freebirds ^Howdy! 19:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

• Op-ed: We must do more to turn readers into editors

• News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm

• Featured content: Slow week for featured content

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 23:02, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

User IvanOS again

Again I would ask you to to take appropriate actions in case of editor User:IvanOS because of his behavior. After he was blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges by removing my referenced edits, he now again continue with the same practice. Please also take a look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Croatia#Minority languages where I got support from community for my editing. Thank you for your time and all the best.--MirkoS18 (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletion request

I noticed your statement at the Doncram arbitration request (16:10, 10 January 2013) that you'd undeleted Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Doncram 2 temporarily. With the case close, would you mind deleting it again, or should it remain as is for now? Nyttend (talk) 06:14, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

• From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger

• News and notes: Finance committee updates

• Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes

• Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns

• WikiProject report: Setting a precedent

• Technology report: Article Feedback reversal

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 09:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Secret Informers

Wikipedia should not be a Gestapo type state [3]. It should not operate on the word of secret informers and in-camera trials. Who was the informer on User:George Ponderevo or was s/he invented by the Arbcom) and please supply diffs for the supposed serious crimes. Then please tell the project how each Arb voted - or are the Arbs ashamed of their actions?  Giano  13:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:General sanctions

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:General sanctions. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

• News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee

• WikiProject report: Making music

• Interview: Meeting in the middle: Wikipedia and libraries

• Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm

• Arbitration report: Richard case closes

• Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 09:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

• WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh

• Featured content: One and a half soursops

• Arbitration report: Two open cases

• News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews

• Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?

• Recent research: "Ignore all rules" in deletions; anonymity and groupthink; how readers react when shown talk pages

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 01:32, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Precious again

	unblock decision
	Thank you for assuming good faith in an unblock decision, saying "There are people who have gathered to lynch an editor they dislike and others debating linguistics, while only very few are discussing the actual merits of the block itself." and "blocks are not supposed to be punitive", - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 76th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize. Thank you again that you tried to free the photographer of the sapphire then, it worked, after all, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/April Fools'

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/April Fools'. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

• Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?

• WikiProject report: Special: FAQs

• Featured content: What the ?

• News and notes: Grants given for Wikipedia Library, six others; April Fool's Day ructions

• Arbitration report: Three open cases

• Technology report: Wikidata phase 2 deployment timetable in doubt

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 15:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Salvo, I´ve done something very stupid

Hello, I don´t know if you remember our conversation, you unblocked me under certain conditions Notice Now instead of reporting the new Socks to you or on the Vandalismpage I´ve not ignored them but again edited in this field.

So here is Hatikwa/Kühntopf -edits, now promoting his own wiki using different IP and Sockpuppets:

• [4]
• [5]
• [6]
• [7]
• [8]
• [9]
• [10]

this one being blocken in de-wp, I don´t know how to copy and paste the englisch version.

• [11]

If you look here:

• [12]

you can see where the wiki has been spammed.

Again, I should not have reacted as I did and I´m sorry for my behaviour. I hope, however, not to be blocked indef, but I will not protest if you do.

Yours sincerely

--Izadso (talk) 20:47, 9 April 2013 (UTC) (I´ll be watching your talkpage, so please your answer here, thank you)--Izadso (talk) 20:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

• Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry

• WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes

• News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer

• Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History

• Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry

• Technology report: Testing week

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 10:08, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Copyrights

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Copyrights. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

More socks

Agdiins (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Frelimines (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
ChronicalUsual (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Sopher99 (talk) 12:30, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Ramnesden, Manu87965231, Agdiins and Frelimines have been indeffed. Cheers. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:40, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank you for all the work you have done to make Wikipedia a better place! P.S. Viva l'Italia! LatinWolf (talk) 10:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Mille grazie! I have just added this barnstar to my collection of shiny things. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Salvio giuliano. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 14:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 14:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

• Op-ed: How do we fix RfA inactivity?

• WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa

• News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops

• Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 23:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Welcome back

Hope your feeling better mate. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Yep, definitely better, thanks! I just needed a quick long check-up... Also, thanks for keeping an eye on my talk page! Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 16:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Good to hear and welcome back. Things all went to hell without you. Seems you dodged a bullet. ;) --The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 21:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Well, my timing has always been perfect... Now, I hope the rest of my term will be uneventful and drama-free. (As if that was possible...) Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 08:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your back yay. Now back to work!

ErBabas (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
InayaKuzbari (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
ChronicalUsual (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Sopher99 (talk) 22:58, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

A couple of socks blocked; InayaKuzbari (talk · contribs) seems to be your run-of-the-mill vandal, unless one of our usual friends has moved to a different continent without telling me... Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 08:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

A bit late in saying this, but welcome back! We've sorely missed you back here in the trenches. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 17:40, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. It's good to be back! Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 08:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

BTW Sal, did you get my mail from about a week ago? Darkness Shines (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

I probably did, but, at the moment, it's lost among the many e-mails I have received over these last two months that I still have to read (over 400, sigh...). I'll look for it and reply as soon as I can. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 08:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Well, ignore the ones selling viagra, which should leave you just a few to read. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

I can't ignore those: I need to compare prices. I'm not rich, you know... Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 08:38, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Bentornato! - I was concerned enough to ask another admin. We all need to put health first. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Would you mind helping me out?

Buongiorno! I am fairly new to Wikipedia and I am still learning guidelines and policies. I seem to have some trouble regarding a disambiguation page. Basically, I am trying to arrange the placement differently but I keep getting reverted by another user (check here). Would you mind sharing your thoughts on the talk page? I don't know how to go about this, so I thought you could help since you are a trusted administrator. Thanks! LatinWolf (talk) 12:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Before 'helping out', please consider the edits of Norseman2000. Someone is not being entirely forthcoming here. RashersTierney (talk) 16:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Well,

Norseman2000 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki),

Latin Wolf (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and

MarleyFan7 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

are  Technically indistinguishable. Latin Wolf, would you care to explain? Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 16:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Erm, Sal, if Norseman2000 aint a mmeatpuppet of Latin Wolf then I have never seen one before Darkness Shines (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Those are not my accounts. I do not engage in sockpuppetry / meatpuppetry. I'm a man of my words, so I'll fight this accusation with everything I have. Perhaps someone else from my IP address created those? I'm not sure how that works. Anyways, I'm starting to feel like RashersTierney is doing all they can to get me in trouble, especially since we disagree on certain things. As for Darkness Shines, I don't even know who that is nor why they are trying to attribute those accounts as mine. I was asking Salvio for his opinion. I'm not sure how all of this happened. LatinWolf (talk) 22:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

It happened because you approached a CU, who has powers beyond the reach of mere mortals. RashersTierney (talk) 00:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Salvio. You may want to comment at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Latin Wolf, since it's largely based on your findings above. Yunshui 雲‍水 07:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I'd have blocked myself, as the explanation I received was not satisfactory, but I was too slow on the trigger. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 08:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)