SU ltd., you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi SU ltd.! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

How to use sources

edit

See the discussion initiated by Flyer22. --SU ltd. (talk) 21:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome template

edit

Hello, SU ltd. Since you're new to editing the English Wikipedia, and since it seems that other language Wikipedias you have edited differ significantly in detail with regard to their policies and guidelines (unless you weren't too familiar with theirs either), here is a Welcome template:

Hello, SU ltd. Welcome to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Flyer22 (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Hi, Flyer22! I was away and had no Internet access. Thank you, I’m very glad to have received welcome from a Wikipedian who is familiar with sexology very well. And thanks a lot for your bibliography again.

As for policies and guidelines here, I know them in general. But I hadn’t heard of Wikipedia:Verifiability#Non-English sources and WP:MEDRS guidelines before you drew my attention to them. So it is expedient to add these two of your references:

--SU ltd. (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome, and good to know that you'll be keeping that policy and guideline in mind. Flyer22 (talk) 16:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
And, of course, I'd gotten your message at WP:MED about the temporary absence of Internet access. Thanks for letting me know before disappearing for a week. Flyer22 (talk) 16:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Classical conditioning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oxon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, SU ltd.. You have new messages at Lova Falk's talk page.
Message added 07:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Lova Falk talk 07:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reflexogenous zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oxon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Blog comments as sources

edit

as you added here (in particular http://www.jillstanek.com/2012/09/washpo-readers-protes-absurd-fact-check-of-obama-infanticide-ad/ ) are not acceptable. That blog itself is not acceptable as a source for a WP:BLP. A user comment certainly is not. Remove it immediately. And all the other crappy "sources" you added as well. -Nathan Johnson (talk) 06:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply