User talk:Ronherry/Archives/2023/May

Words

To avoid an edit conflict I should leave a personal message to you here; you don't need to respond to it howsoever. I noticed you've had a history of using words either incorrectly or needlessly wordily i.e. "bisected the lyrical scope", "crashed controversially", and the latest example, "multifarious records", which imho sounds awkward and steers the reader out of focus. This is not to lecture you but a personal tip for me, which has worked pretty well for my writing, is: "Never use a long word where a short one will do." (cue George Orwell). We all make mistakes and I think it's best to share with you some of my two cents. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 11:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, do yoy know taylor awift? AriSwift (talk) 00:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Met Gala

I noticed you reverted my addition to the lead of the Met Gala article. Now, I can start a discussion on the the talk page easily enough, but I was wondering what you meant by "unnecessary content as per WP:LEAD". It was precisely because of WP:LEAD that I added what I did: a big chunk of the article is about controversy, so for the lead to adequately summarize the article that should be mentioned. StAnselm (talk) 22:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Everything related to pop culture has some controversy related to it. The Lead should be short and crisp. Unless there is something controversial about the entire system/structure of the Met Gala, it is pointless to mention a vague statement in the lead. Wardrobe malfunctions and celebrity feuds are not noteworthy; they're superfluous. I hope this helps. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 17:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Split Folklore live album

Could you split Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions#Live album into a separate article as Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions (From the Disney+ Special) 223.178.87.210 (talk) 17:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

I do not believe a split is required in this case. Sorry. ℛonherry☘ 18:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural impact of Taylor Swift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evermore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

	The Special Barnstar
	Great work with the cohesive body of the Cultural impact of Taylor Swift article! Very well-carried out and detailed with strong referencing, upright wording, and qualitative research. :)

Ben| he/him (talk) 19:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

@Ben0006: I appreciate this very much. Thank you! ℛonherry☘ 20:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Cultural impact of Taylor Swift. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural impact of Taylor Swift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hipster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Miss Americana into Cultural impact of Taylor Swift. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:47, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you!

Caramelo77 (talk) 16:14, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural impact of Taylor Swift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Target.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Question

Hey. I saw your recent edit to Beyonce, and I recently had a similar discussion about her cousin Angie Beyince being described as a music executive in her article. I said that she shouldn't be labeled that here because she is not commonly referred to by that title in media. What do you think? 166.194.204.46 (talk) 14:53, 26 May 2023 (UTC)