Rokonja

Hi,

Please provide references for the changes you are making to Serbian and Croatian, or discuss them on the Talk pages. — kwami (talk) 12:49, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

For instance, someone requested a reference for the claim that Serbian is a "regional language" in Macedonia. You deleted the tag without explanation. Such edits may be interpreted as WP:vandalism. Since that section was not supported by references, I have now deleted it altogether. — kwami (talk) 23:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Hey

Could you remember to use the edit summary when you change numbers and stuff? Thanks! Endofskull (talk) 17:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

And supply references for the new numbers, or they will be reverted. — kwami (talk) 23:03, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Croatian language. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ialsoagree (talk) 19:26, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Croatian language. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.   — Jeff G.  ツ 20:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Greek–Serbian relations, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Greek–Serbian relations was changed by Rokonja (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925472 on 2010-11-19T13:07:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:07, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

Rokonja - You appear to be engaged in an edit war on the above article. Your changes have been reverted by multiple editors over the last couple of days. Please use the talk page to discuss any changes you wish to make and get agreement from other editors before making them. If you continue to edit war on this article or any other, you may be blocked without further warning. --Kateshortforbob _talk 14:57, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

As an additional note, another editor has brought up your editing at the Administrator's noticeboard. --Kateshortforbob _talk 14:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48hrs for edit warring, as you did at Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 15:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Croats, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Adrian (talk) 19:05, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

You already tried to change the numbers months ago here. Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, please don't change the population numbers unless you can provide sources that support the changes. --Enric Naval (talk) 22:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Also, if you are interested in how the numbers were calculated, you can read Talk:Croats/Archive_3#Trying_to_reach_a_new_consensus_on_the_total_population_figure. --Enric Naval (talk) 16:46, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vuk Stefanović Karadžić, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Adrian (talk) 06:00, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vuk Stefanović Karadžić, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STOP! WhiteWriter ^speaks 19:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Please restore the semiprotection template

in this edit, you removed the semiprotection template from House of Kotromanić. Your removal of the template does not affect the actual semiprotection status of the article, which can only be changed by admins. This article has been the subject of past edit warring and is now officially semiprotected. Please be aware that administrators may issue discretionary sanctions for ethnically-motivated editing under the provisions of the WP:ARBMAC decision. Take care that your own edits do not fit that description. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

House of Kotromanic

Your edits[1] of House of Kotromanic violate Wikipedia:Reliable Sources,[2]. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring at House of Kotromanic

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

---

• Editing of Balkan topics that appears to be motivated by "advocacy, propaganda, furtherance of outside conflicts, or political or ideological struggle" can lead to discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBMAC. Open a WP:Request for comment or use other means of dispute resolution to determine the proper nationality (if any) to ascribe to this royal house.

Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Kotromanić

Join talk page discussion, and bring sources for your claim. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 16:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Your name has been mentioned at User talk:EdJohnston#House of Kotromanić. So far you the only one (of the three people) who has reverted recently who has not joined in the discussion at Talk:House of Kotromanić. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm Kashmiri. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ruđer Bošković seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hello, the current wording of the lede is a result of WP:CONSENSUS which was reached after months or years of discussions. Please do not add WP:POV to this article, and read the article's Talk page first. Regards, kashmiri ^TALK 22:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Ruđer Bošković. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Hello, the current version of lede is a product of consensus which was reached after months if not years of discussions. Please do not add nationalistic overtones to it. This is a repeat request. kashmiri ^TALK 18:18, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Dražen Petrović's father

Do not remove his father's origin.--Zoupan 08:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

And you do not claim his father's Serbian orgin.

June 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ruđer Bošković. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. kashmiri ^TALK 19:40, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ruđer Bošković, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding unverified or controversial information on Ruđer Bošković. As it has been discussed on the Talk page, the modern concept of "nationality" originated later than Ruđer Bošković's lifetime, hence any wars are futile and show editor's ignorance. You should stop at once. kashmiri ^TALK 19:45, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

• I am fully aware that modern concept of nationality originates later after Ruđer Bošković's lifetime. The listed source clearly says that Ruđer was a CROATIAN scientist, hence i'm not doing anything inappropriate.

Talkback

Hello, Rokonja. You have new messages at Kashmiri's talk page.
Message added 19:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

kashmiri ^TALK 19:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:46, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Dražen Petrović edit war

I suppose I could assume you understood the earlier warning from 2011, but just in case:

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.

--Joy [shallot] (talk) 23:29, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

The correct course of action is for you to find a source that says what you're saying - that this Jovan Petrović never declared himself as a Serb - and cite that. Everything else is just various levels of hearsay. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 16:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

--Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:25, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Dalmatian Croat (people)

Hello - I've alluded to a Croats edit of yours on Talk:Dalmatian_Croat#Provenance_of_this_redirect and thought you might like to review/refine/comment. – Ian, DjScrawl (talk) 16:38, 19 October 2013 (UTC)