Rojabell89

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madame Klis (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madame Klis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Rojabell89! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to John Franklin Witter have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: John Franklin Witter was changed by Rojabell89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878965 on 2023-06-09T12:46:39+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:46, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Ma nam is geoffrey. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

sorry Rojabell89 (talk) 12:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Do yourself a favour and stop messing about, or you might find yourself sanctioned. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:54, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

ok sorry Rojabell89 (talk) 12:54, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)