Archivi in Wikipedia

edit

Ciao, can you indicate ne examples of spanish archive wworking wikth Wikipedia, thakns --Susanna Giaccai (talk) 14:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of History of Spanish photojournalism

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on History of Spanish photojournalism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/scw/aura.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:14, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Rodelar. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 00:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 00:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

War correspondents in Syria

edit

Here is what I can do regarding your request. I've tried to include that prose that did not violate copyright.

(intro)

edit
  •  
    The National flag of Syria

[1][2]

Laws on Freedom of Press

edit

The presence of the Geneva Conventions: (protocol I) and its effect on the study of foreign cultures involved in civil wars by overseas observers. Article 43 of the Syrian constitution provides for freedom of the press. A 2011 media law prohibits a “monopoly on the media,” guarantees the “right to access information about public affairs,” and bans “the arrest, questioning, or searching of journalists.” In practice, these protections are virtually nonexistent in government-held areas.

<copyvio of https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2015/syria> <copyvio of https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2016/syria>

Death of Foreign Correspondents and Civilians

edit
 
Anthony Shadid speaking at a conference

[3] In between these publishing dates, there have been accumulating reports of similar journalist deaths ranging from roughly 60-300 deaths in correspondents' population alone. The Committee to Protect Journalists in 2012 provided statistics stating that the Syrian Civil War has one of the largest recorded numbers of deaths when it comes to the number of war journalists who died abroad. Most of these deaths took place in Syria or adjacent borders and countries where the correspondents did not have any direct protection or were in travel.

[4] These statistics, which contribute to the overall civilian death toll of the Syrian Civil War have become part of numerous outrages against the occupation.

[5][6]

Anthony Shadid[7]

[8]

Marie Colvin after her eyesight was wounded in an IED strike

Marie Colvin's death.[9] <copyvio of https://www.britannica.com/biography/Marie-Colvin>

Value of Journalism In Syria

edit

Francesca Borri statement. [10] Her opinions on the culture that is perceived by some as a cause of war in these times of turmoil further supports the importance of journalistic insight by these correspondents. Borri, who has been reporting from Syria since 2012, has published two books on the dynamics of the war within the country and within refugee communities as a result. <note, this appears to be personal analysis>

References

  1. ^ "Syrian civil war". BBC News. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  2. ^ "Syria country profile". BBC News. 2017-10-31. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  3. ^ Hunnewell, Susannah (2016-05-02). "The Art of War Reporting: An Interview with Janine di Giovanni". The Paris Review. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  4. ^ "Fewer Journalist Deaths in Syria – Because There Aren't Many Left". Syria. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  5. ^ "A Foreign Correspondent Reflects On The Arab Spring". NPR.org. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  6. ^ "Anthony Shadid: Time Is Running Out for a Better Future for Syria". FRONTLINE. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  7. ^ "Anthony Shadid | Interview". Granta Magazine. 2012-07-30. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  8. ^ Fox, Margalit (2012-02-16). "Anthony Shadid, 43, Dies; Reporter in Middle East". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  9. ^ Priest, Dana (2016-07-09). "War reporter Marie Colvin was tracked, targeted and killed by Assad's forces, family says". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  10. ^ "Syria, Refugees, Journalism: Interview with War Correspondent Francesca Borri - 4Liberty.eu". 4Liberty.eu. 2016-04-05. Retrieved 2017-11-16.

Controversy on War Correspondence

edit

What follows is a glowing essay on Francesca Borri. Copyvio of <https://medium.com/upstartcity/the-journalist-who-shattered-my-war-correspondent-dream-18c3d2427c79> Category:War correspondents

That's all I can provide. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:42, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Rodelar. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 01:53, 20 November 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:53, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

IE Business School fallacies and promotional content

edit

The reasonal is the following. All european business schools pages show their rankings. So it should be fine for IE to display theirs too. However, IE has not simply got excluded for a academic reasons. It has been excluded because of cheating! Hence, if FT rankings have to be presented in the page in order to reinforce the knowledge about the school's reputation, it is essential to mention the reasons why IE was excluded in 2018. As it can be read in the sources provided, IE has also fired staff as a consequence of this. Not mentioning this would be a partial and misleading information in favour of the school. Wikipedia is not the place to advertise the school and if its alumni/students/staff are unhappy with the exclusion they should discuss with their school. Not trying to "hide" this fact improving (in a dishonest way) the school's reputation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borrelli433 (talkcontribs) 18:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Rodelar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Would be great to get your opinion...

edit

...about the issue of the IE Business School here [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joereddington (talkcontribs) 19:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply