RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar), you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar)! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Organic mineral

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Organic mineral at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Tone 12:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Organic mineral

edit

On 25 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Organic mineral, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that carbon-carrying minerals are known as organic minerals, except for some that were considered inorganic before 1828? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Organic mineral. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Organic mineral), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geochemistry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Extraterrestrial diamonds

edit

On 21 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Extraterrestrial diamonds, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that extraterrestrial diamonds (pictured) in meteorites preserve their history from before the Solar System formed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Extraterrestrial diamonds. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Extraterrestrial diamonds), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Geochemical Society logo.jpg

edit
 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 22:36, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar). Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

IP block exempt

edit

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. RockMagnetist(talk) 01:13, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Mineral evolution

edit

Please see note on your DYK nomination on the DYK talk page. Yoninah (talk) 17:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Mineral evolution

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Mineral evolution at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 22:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Incomplete DYK nomination

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Mineral evolution at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:53, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mineral evolution

edit

On 6 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mineral evolution, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to the theory of mineral evolution, the number of mineral species on Earth has increased from about 250 to over 5400? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mineral evolution. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mineral evolution), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

New message from Narutolovehinata5

edit
 
Hello, RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar). You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Deep water cycle.
Message added 09:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Deep water cycle

edit

On 3 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Deep water cycle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that recent research has shown the presence of a deep water cycle all the way down through the Earth's lower mantle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Deep water cycle. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Deep water cycle), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Steele (astrobiologist) has been accepted

edit
 
Andrew Steele (astrobiologist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:49, 17 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

apology

edit

sorry about that... the project is inexctricably more coherent relative to ecorgeions in australia that are linked to the biota project than ecology, and it takes quite a struggle to populate some categories and articles with projects tags that say 'inactive' as well as mucking up assessment. JarrahTree 00:41, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Quite o.k. I was using the criteria in the documentation for Template:WikiProject status to decide whether the project was active, but if you're interested in keeping it alive that's great. RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar) (talk) 01:06, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Deep biosphere

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Deep biosphere you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Jens Lallensack: Thanks for taking this on! RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar) (talk) 16:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Deep biosphere

edit

The article Deep biosphere you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Deep biosphere for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Deep biosphere

edit

On 5 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Deep biosphere, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that genetic diversity in the deep biosphere is at least as great as it is on the surface? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Deep biosphere. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Deep biosphere), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply