Rishika.dhanawade

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rishika.dhanawade (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I accept that the User:Digvijay411 account was my sockpuppet but i have no idea how i got blocked as sockpuppet of this User:TekkenJinKazama .I did not create that account, may be our editing habits match . I apologize for the sockpuppetry mistake rather offense. Everybody gets a second chance can I also get please. I promise I wont repeat any of my mistakes and wrong editing habits

Decline reason:

No response to questions poseted below by JamesBWatson. Make a new unblock request when you are ready to answer those questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am willing to consider giving you a second chance, but I am consulting the blocking administrator first. I also suggest that your chance of being given a second chance may be increased if you post here a bit more detail about how your future editing will be different from what you did in the past. You say that you won't "repeat any of [your] mistakes and wrong editing habits": can you say a few words explaining what those mistakes and wrong editing habits were? The problem is that we often get blocked editors saying things like that, but then when they are unblocked they do make the same mistakes again, very likely because they actually didn't fully understand what the problems with their editing were. For that reasons, most administrators are unlikely to unblock unless the blocked editor makes it clear that he or she really does know what sort of mistakes to avoid in future. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

• I have just noticed that 9 days ago the blocking administrator said that he or she would not be available for about two weeks, and has not edited since. Unfortunately, that means that it is likely to be a while before your unblock request is dealt with. However, since you have already been blocked for over 7 weeks, perhaps you can bear a few more days of uncertainty. Also, it will give you time to respond to my suggestion above that you give a bit more detail about how any future editing will be different from what you did in the past. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
• @Rishika.dhanawade, if you re-add any information on this Talk page involving new or existing articles on Wikipedia, I will revoke your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:49, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jamai Raja Break Bumper Poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jamai Raja Break Bumper Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rishika.dhanawade. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)