Revprez

Your edits at AR-15 style rifle

You've twice removed "assault rifle" from the History section. Although modern AR-15 style rifles are semi-automatic, the original Armalite model was select-fire. This has been discussed at Talk:AR-15 style rifle/Archive 2#Armalite assault rifle. If you disagree, I would recommend bringing it up on the talk page, otherwise you will likely be reverted. –dlthewave ☎ 12:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

• Acknowledged, and good find. I had not known that the Armalite AR-15 had entered into limited production. --Rev Prez (talk) 21:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

January 2022

Your recent editing history at Kari Lake shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

I just want a TOC

Maybe I'll get one.

TOC, here I come

Let's do this.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Revprez. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Kari Lake, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:39, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

I have no relationship with Kari Lake whatsoever. Rev Prez (talk) 13:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Lean Years.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Lean Years.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:04, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

My subject about default country and people of this country

My advised to un to see all cases and their solution and example for Afghanistan srilanka Iraq Pakistan he is recover this stage and country gdp is very low their comparison other country Italic 2400:ADC7:14E:C100:1CF2:42E:923B:30DE (talk) 09:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joint Planning Document

The article Joint Planning Document has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I found some sources but not enough to be notable I think

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 11:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)