Renanx3

Breakout

Only the earliest release date goes in the infobox. And putting <br> is unnecessary. XxJoshuaxX (talk) 19:36, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Look at this: "Only the earliest known date that the album was released should be specified". XxJoshuaxX (talk) 19:40, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Ballads (Mariah Carey album)

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Ballads (Mariah Carey album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ballads (Mariah Carey album). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? CRocka05 (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fly on the Wall.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fly on the Wall.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Queensized.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Queensized.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Miley Cyrus

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miley Cyrus. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. - Damicatz (talk) 17:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Please see WP:BLP - Damicatz (talk) 17:13, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Look, stop being dramatic. There's a big difference between having a few comments about her relationships and friends, and that she likes to drink ketchup out of the bottle. If you can't see the difference, perhaps you should find some other outlet for your Hannah Montana fever. Tan | 39 17:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm don't being dramatic, you are saying to me that "wikipedia does not tabloid" and all these things are gossips, correct? I just wanna know it, no more else, just it. Renanx3 (talk) 17:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

For the record, I never said "wikipedia does not tabloid" (as you repeatedly state), simply because "tabloid" is not a verb. I said that Wikipedia is not a tabloid. Semantics aside, my point was that material needs to remain encyclopedic. Other editors obviously agree with me (given the reverts of your additions). I'm not trying to shut you down, I'm not trying to discourage you from adding sourced material. What I am trying to do is keep Wikipedia credible and respectable. Random factoids about her life are not encyclopedic. If you see other things in the article that you want to remove because of this, go right ahead. Tan | 39 17:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

You are doing good work on improving this article - don't be discouraged by disagreements - that is going to happen particularly with significant changes. You can probably make the article better if you did prune the personal life section of similar type tabloidish junk - be careful, that does not mean all of it. --NrDg 17:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not English/North-American. The problem is that I really do not understand the diference in terms of relevance between the fact that she have dogs, cats or wathever and that she is fan of Grey's anatomy, so everytime I keep in this situation. Renanx3 (talk) 17:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

There isn't a lot of difference and those facts could also be removed, in my opinion, to improve the article. Others may disagree. A reasonable test might be where the information came from. If it is from an actual interview or article in something other than a gossip or human interest magazine - USA Today, NY Times is good, People marginal, Teen mags or blogs are junk - it has a stronger claim to be encyclopedic and not just sensational. If lots of other editors disagree with what you put in it is also a good indication that it does not belong. Some human interest stuff needs to be in this article to better describe her as a person. At some point it becomes excessive, particularly if trivial. --NrDg 17:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation, I get some points. I really was with this doubt but now you clarified, will follow your advices to that does not happen again. Thank you. Renanx3 (talk) 18:12, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

What you did was not wrong until you started undoing other peoples edits of your material. If you put something in and an established editor significantly changes it, it is an invitation to discuss this with that editor. See WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for some guidance on this. It is good to be bold about your edits, which you were. Even among very experienced editors there will be strongly held opinions on what should or should not be in articles. Discussion with other editors is a good way to learn. --NrDg 18:31, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

I think that the problem was the fact that I want to resolve it soon, and do not go through the process of discussion, was a really big mistake, but know I learn, I want to thank you for that, swear that this will not be repeated. Renanx3 (talk) 18:44, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Twilight, Doesnt count

Becuase is is a demo album and was unreleased & wasnt official. It is counted as "Other Albums". --N5 MusiC ChArts X (talk) 21:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes and it should stay that way in the "Unreleased Albums" section becuase it was a Demo album & wasnt released while spirit was released making it an official album in the "Albums" section. Only released albums feture in the "Albums" part of the box.--N5 MusiC ChArts X (talk) 21:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

I Dont mean it that way. Example. Albums Spirit, is the correct way and Released albums go in where it says Albums. While Twilight was unreleased and a DEMO album only not making it an album, Lewis has said during interveiws. —Preceding unsigned comment added by N5 MusiC ChArts X (talk • contribs) 21:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Ive added Twilight in the Leona Lewis box as a Unreleased album. Thnaks --N5 MusiC ChArts X (talk) 21:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I did, ive added Twilight in the Box as Unreleased --N5 MusiC ChArts X (talk) 21:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Which means?--N5 MusiC ChArts X (talk) 21:57, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

I Think we dont need to go that far. Twilight isnt Official and does not need to be in the Album box in the Template. Keep checking the template and you will see my change as Twilight is in the section "Unreleased Albums".--N5 MusiC ChArts X (talk) 22:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Maybe --N5 MusiC ChArts X (talk) 16:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Miley Breakout.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:Miley Breakout.ogg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:45, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

• I added a fair use rational to the sound sample. Don't forget to do this on other stuff you upload in the future. Stuff gets deleted if you don't. --NrDg 15:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Lady GaGa. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please remember that any criticism or controversy involving a living person must be supported by the very best of sources, per WP:BLP. Forums, blogs, fansites and other irrelevant websites are discouraged. If you need any specific help identifying reliable sources please contact me. Best — Realist² 19:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Why did you do this?, while some of it was good, you basically reverted my clean up, reinserting chunks of information that was unsourced or badly sourced. You might find that making smaller changes in each edit is better. It took me a long time to clean all the rubbish out of that article. *Shrug* — Realist² 18:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Lady GaGa

Ok, It might not be TIME Magazine but I don't think it's unreliable. Lady GaGa has done some pretty dodgy interviews......this phone interview with some chick on YouTube springs to mind. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ooqp2vKo5s I think that information is extremely valid to Lady GaGa's career beginnings and inspiration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jemgrrrl (talk • contribs) 22:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Looking at it, you seem to have removed the info on her music interests as a child, writing songs an listening to Jackson amongst others. If I'm incorrect please forgive me. — Realist² 02:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

• I've reverted this edit you made to Lady GaGa, because it introduced a blatant grammatical error. The text was revised to improve the grammar and tone. This matter was also discussed at Talk:Lady GaGa; I invite you to discuss there if you really feel there's a reason for your wording. —C.Fred (talk) 13:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I see from past post that, darling the Pope, God, Lady GaGa and everyone herself thinks you are a fool, ignorant, arrogant and childish. I will report, if you continuley vandilies the article, and that is a therat, darling. You kinda dont follow the rules, you are worse than me, and Im talking from past experencies.You attack me, I attack you. Dance-pop (talk) 00:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

OMG. That was one of the funniest posts ever, you are actually taking this serioulsy. Ah i feel so sorry for you, because you made laugh untill I cryed, you are really funny(and thats not sarcasm) your probably 12 yrs old or something, anyway I am going to report you. P.S do not take it serouisy. Your good friend D then hypen then P. Dance-pop (talk) 02:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Yay know were friends, not. You are just a loser, a fricken loser. And about the funny, honey that was sarcasm. P.S. You are such a loser. Thats why I always get my way Dance-pop (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

He ha. Your recent edits on my page will get you blocked. Calling me a 'fricken loser'--abuse alert. Im not your 'sweetheart' who do you think you are. Try to block me, you cant. I said it was Just jokes, so calm down. You take things too serious. C ya.Dance-pop (talk) 03:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Hot 100 2009

I have reverted your edits there. A table can be kept and it saves a lot of time when the page will be enhanced at the end of the year. It's not because "I" want the table to be kept. Its because we are all enhancing the Hot 100 yearly pages and this page will be enhanced as the year progresses not by commentary but by a structured table approach. Discuss it at the talk page before reverting changes. "Legolas" (talk) 03:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

No need to rush

There is no urgent need to add the theme song, and relying on original research from MySpace videos, You Tube videos, and gossip sites is unnecessary. When the show comes out, there will be a credit for the theme song, and you can add it then.—Kww(talk) 17:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Lady GaGa image

Yes. Its an image vio. Don't worry. It will be deleted by Feb 22, as the template says. --Efe (talk) 05:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Stop trolling

Don't do this again, it's completely unacceptable behavior. — R² 11:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

You were taunting him, please don't. — R² 14:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

I'mk Back!....HA HA HA

Stop this kind of behaviour. Realist pointed out to you earlier to stop trolling or this will be reported. My suggestion is ignore Dance-pop or the IP completely. --Legolas!! ^(talktome) 13:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

"Dance-pop"

Hi, who is "Dance-pop"? Has Anybody Seen My Disco Stick? 00:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey. just calm down, I only asked a question, I am not "Dance-pop". Has Anybody Seen My Disco Stick? 01:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok, are you from another country bceause you english is not very good no offence or are you illiterate, I am not sure could you clarify. I am not you sweetherat, we are in the 21st century not like in the 1400 hundreds. I am not going to agure with you and stoop down to you level. I am not on wikipedia to make enemies or argue. Period.

“ Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.Albert Einstein ”

and Has Anybody Seen My Disco Stick? 02:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Uploading "ogg" sound files"

Hello, I saw how you uploaded several song samples, like File:Fly on the Wall.ogg. I want to upload some of those types of files for the album article, Hannah Montana 3. Could you please help me by telling me where to find sound files saved as ogg that are samples. Please reply. --Ipodnano05 (talk) 08:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)