User talk:Ralbegen/Archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Could you please add your thoughts?
Hi, Ralbegen. I was wondering if you could please add your thoughts to the discussion regarding the subsection The Gurdian here - Talk:List of left-wing publications in the United Kingdom. Thanks in advance if you decide to help out. If you would like any further information some discussion around the topic has also happened on my own talk page. Helper201 (talk) 00:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Just a note to thank you...
... for keeping the election results updated overnight. --bodnotbod (talk) 01:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm probably going to have to call it a night now, but hopefully it's made things easier for tomorrow's editors. Ralbegen (talk) 01:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Welsh Labour Party leadership election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eluned Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Libertarian Party AfD
Hey Ralbegen. I am so disappointed about the AfD decision. I have asked the closing Admin for the above to reconsider their decision, either to relist or to expect a 7th nomination in due course. This is just to let you know of my view. doktorb wordsdeeds 04:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hey Doktorbuk — I think No consensus is a fair enough summary of the discussion. I'm not sure how helpful another nomination would be right now. Personally I'm going to try to improve the article by bringing its focus more in line with what reliable sources there are. If you think the article should be deleted, my advice would be to seek a steer on WT:N about whether a political party being registered and contesting national elections contributes towards notability, as two of the four keep !votes posited. Without an authoritative consensus on the matter, AfDs on small parties will continue to reach no consensus or to result in keep decisions; and if the consensus there is in favour of keeping articles on such subjects, then it'll save time for everybody on future deletion discussions. Ralbegen (talk) 06:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Charles Mendl
Hi, I'm Xevus11. Ralbegen, thanks for creating Charles Mendl!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article content looks good, but you should split it into sections and add an infobox.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Candidate List for the Leadership of the Conservative Party
Can you please put the previous list of leadership candidates back on the page. It is deleterious for the quality of the page, the candidates are well-sourced (from the best political journalists in the country) and it is extraordinary that you would not include a list of prospective and declared candidates for the leadership of the party. I recommend that you reverse edits forthwith. Thank you--109.157.169.89 (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Morning, Ralbegen. I thought you might be able to usefully add to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ConservativePartyLeadershipElectionPageFounder. Bondegezou (talk) 10:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Ralbegen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |