User talk:Queen of Hearts/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Queen of Hearts. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Irony
ResolvedHello! Talk:Irony_(Wonder_Girls_song)#Requested_move_10_May_2023 should have been closed as move, given WP:RMNOMIN. Could you please undo your closure for this? Please also see the current discussion at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Thank you. Breaktheicees (talk) 20:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Breaktheicees: I thought I already replied there but I guess not. This is kinda a gray area of policy, but I guess I will... CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 20:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 August 2023
- From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online
- News and notes: You like RecentChanges?
- In the media: Taking it sleazy
- Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Wikipedia
- Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties
- Humour: The Dehumourification Plan
- Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday
It appears that you tagged John Rolph (disambiguation) with {{Db-g14}} even though it did not "disambiguate only one extant Wikipedia page" but rather two, John Rolph and John Rolph (judge). (See Archive.org.) If you think this was a correct tag, could you explain why this page was within the language of the G14 criterion for speedy deletion? (I have not asked the admin who deleted it.) SilverLocust 💬 21:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @SilverLocust: John Rolph is the primary topic, and the only thing this was disambiguating was the judge. As far as I'm aware, this has always been interpreted as
Disambiguation pages that have titles ending in "(disambiguation)" but disambiguate only one extant Wikipedia page.
CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 21:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)No, {{one other topic}} is for "disambiguation page containing only two topics, one of which is the primary topic." If G14 excluded the primary topic, then every WP:ONEOTHER page would be eligible for G14. That's why, for example, Mountain people (disambiguation) currently has a PROD. SilverLocust 💬 22:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- I suppose {{one other topic}} may just be another option. My interpretation of why it says "disambiguates" rather than "links" was in order to exclude the "see also" pages. I will try to find some relevant discussion/seek clarification. Thanks. SilverLocust 💬 23:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, it wasn't actually the disambiguation page that you tagged for deletion. You moved the dabpage to John Rolph (politician) and BLAR'd it. (I would personally move it to John Rolph (disambiguation) rather than to an implausible title for the dabpage history, though I have seen this approach before.) SilverLocust 💬 03:09, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- I suppose {{one other topic}} may just be another option. My interpretation of why it says "disambiguates" rather than "links" was in order to exclude the "see also" pages. I will try to find some relevant discussion/seek clarification. Thanks. SilverLocust 💬 23:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
- A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment
.
Technical news
- Special:Contributions now shows the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. (T324166)
Arbitration
- The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus
. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged tonote when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful
.
Miscellaneous
- Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Christian Science Center article
{{resbox}} Hello Clyde. I wanted to follow up here as per the closed discussion template instructions. Thanks for weighing in on the discussion on the Christian Science Center article concerning the requested move for the purpose of updating the title. I thought that if there was no opposition the move should be made, as per the closing instructions for move requests. And it was also my impression that a lack of consensus occurs only when there is a situation such as two equally strong competing arguments, as per the closing instructions section on possible outcomes. Also, it appears the guideline you referenced is for article deletions, not name changes. Thanks. FirsthandPOV-CCS (talk) 13:04, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- FirsthandPOV-CCS, I missed the that no one explicitly opposed and that it was only relisted once.
Relisted. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 14:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hi ClydeFranklin. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Steps such as checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline are mandatory and will take a few minutes per article.
- Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any required steps.
- Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to Cornell study on Wikipedia discussions
{{resbox}} Hello ClydeFranklin,
I’m reaching out as part of a Cornell University academic study investigating the potential for user-facing tools to help improve discussion quality within Wikipedia discussion spaces (such as talk pages, noticeboards, etc.).
We wanted to invite you to join the study because you frequently participate in formal procedural discussions such as Requested Moves. Such discussions can sometimes play host to prolonged back-and-forth debate among editors, which is exactly the type of environment that our study targets.
The study centers around a prototype tool, ConvoWizard, which is designed to warn Wikipedia editors when a discussion they are replying to is getting tense and at risk of derailing into personal attacks or incivility. More information about ConvoWizard and the study can be found at our research project page on meta-wiki.
If this sounds like it might be interesting to you, you can use this link to sign up and install ConvoWizard. Of course, if you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message.
If you have any questions or thoughts about the study, our team is happy to discuss! You may direct such comments to me or to my collaborator, Cristian_at_CornellNLP.
Thank you for your consideration.
--- Jonathan at CornellNLP (talk) 17:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Closure
{{resolved}} Since "technically" per WP:DELPRO#NAC, a non-admin shouldn't be closing a discussion they participated in (and yes, SNOW is of course an extension or IAR), I thought I'd (hopefully) save us any potential drama/disruption and endorse/affirm the close. I hope this helps. - jc37 20:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Jc37, thank you. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 20:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 September 2023
- In the media: "Just flirting", going Dutch and Shapps for the defence?
- Obituary: Nosebagbear
- Featured content: Catching up
- Traffic report: Some of it's magic, some of it's tragic
Request on 17:25:36, 7 September 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Kellerlikehelen
I am wondering what in the text is making it seem like an advertisement. I am also wondering why the website references are not deemed reliable. They are not produced by the creator or the subject.
Kellerlikehelen (talk) 17:25, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Acknowledging receipt. Currently away from my PC, but should hopefully respond by end of the day UTC. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 18:15, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Kellerlikehelen, I'm sorry this took so long. I've been busy with real life recently. Firstly, my comment that nothing has changed is wrong. I missed the changes you made. I think the "recognition and reception" is a tad bit promotional since none of the recognition seems to be from notable places, but it's passable. As for sources, it's really borderline. 3 sections are unsourced and I think the sources that are there fall short, but I recommend you resubmit it so someone else can take a look at it. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 19:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
{{resolved}} Hi ClydeFranklin. Just wanted to let you know that free files mistagged as non-free don't require a trip to FfD. This is a wiki after all, so please don't hesitate to be bold :) Thanks, FASTILY 06:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Fastily: noted, thank you. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 14:43, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
"TayTay" listed at Redirects for discussion
{{resbox}}
The redirect TayTay has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 21 § TayTay until a consensus is reached. Ippantekina (talk) 04:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Environmental Working Group on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol newsletter
Hello Queen of Hearts,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
{{resbox}}
Hi ClydeFranklin. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
- Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
- Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hardeep Singh Nijjar on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 October 2023
- News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published
- Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"
- Featured content: By your logic,
- Poetry: "The Sight"
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text:
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Technical news
- Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)
Arbitration
Miscellaneous
- The 2023 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of one new CheckUser.
- Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections opens on 2 October and closes on 8 October.
{{resolved}} In cases like these, where the discussion is messy (because it's a renomination) and there are a large number of categories involved, it's best to avoid snow closes. Leaving it for a few more days doesn't hurt. Just something to keep in mind for the future. — Qwerfjkltalk 15:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Qwerfjkl, noted with apologies. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 15:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Richard Worley (police officer)
{{resolved}}
Hello! Your submission of Richard Worley (police officer) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians experiencing stress has been nominated for discussion
{{resbox}}
Category:Wikipedians experiencing stress has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:53, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Israel on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Richard Worley (police officer)
{{resbox}}
On 16 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Richard Worley (police officer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Richard Worley played in minor baseball leagues and is now the commissioner of the Baltimore Police Department? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Richard Worley (police officer). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Richard Worley (police officer)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Internal market
{{resolved}} I strongly oppose your move of the "internal market (disambiguation)" page. In 2012, it was established via RM that "internal market" overwhelmingly refers to the EU, and a Google search indicates that hasn't changed even with the establishment of a UK version. I also think that a change of this nature should go through the proper WP:RM channel for page moves, rather than in the backwater of RfD, with a very sparsely attended discussion. Thanks — Amakuru (talk) 10:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Amakuru, I don't know how on earth I missed this, but I'm very sorry. I only saw it while looking through an archive.
- Anyways, this request sounds reasonable, but for clarity's sake, what are you requesting? That the move be reverted then taken to RM or that a new RM be started to move Internal market back to Internal market (disambiguation)?
- Thanks and please accept my apology. Clyde [trout needed] 04:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Invisible re-ping since I never got a "ping sent" notification. Sorry if this double-pings you. Clyde [trout needed] 04:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Clyde - I'd say probably a revert of the move and open an RM would be my request. That way we reaffirm the long-term status quo initially, and then assess the community's consensus from there. By the way, how do you see notifications of pings? I've not been aware of that before! Cheers — Amakuru (talk)
- Amakuru,
done. And about the successful ping notifications, WP:ECHO § Successful mentions. Clyde [trout needed] 16:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Amakuru,
- Hi Clyde - I'd say probably a revert of the move and open an RM would be my request. That way we reaffirm the long-term status quo initially, and then assess the community's consensus from there. By the way, how do you see notifications of pings? I've not been aware of that before! Cheers — Amakuru (talk)
- Invisible re-ping since I never got a "ping sent" notification. Sorry if this double-pings you. Clyde [trout needed] 04:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
_icon.png){kind=link}
_icon.png){kind=link}
_icon.png){kind=link}
Speedy deletion nomination of JUNIPER
{{resbox}}
A tag has been placed on JUNIPER requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gnangarra 07:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Richard Worley (police officer)
{{resbox}}
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Richard Worley (police officer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vanderwaalforces -- Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:21, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Vanderwaalforces, thanks much. I await your review. Clyde [trout needed] 18:33, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Richard Worley (police officer)
{{resbox}}
The article Richard Worley (police officer) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Richard Worley (police officer) for comments about the article, and Talk:Richard Worley (police officer)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vanderwaalforces -- Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks much! Clyde [trout needed] 22:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)