Your submission at Articles for creation: Janneke Parrish (December 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 08:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Quaoarian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 08:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janneke Parrish has been accepted

edit
 
Janneke Parrish, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 08:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Hello, Quaoarian. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Janneke Parrish, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2603:3001:27B7:8000:1C2F:2174:2D96:EE2E (talk) 14:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The username is similar to the username Quouar, the author of self-publish promo from on Reddit about Parrish's book [1], which appears to be Parrish herself on other platforms. See: [2], [3], [4], and [5]. Quaoarian is the adjective of the planet Quaoar which itself is an alternate spelling of Kwawar, presumably the same pronunciation as Quouar.
2603:3001:27B7:8000:1C2F:2174:2D96:EE2E (talk) 14:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Probably should link here the post Talk:Janneke Parrish#Justification for connected contributor. It links to user contributions adding Parrish to Wikipedia 20 years ago. 72.238.1.69 (talk) 17:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Janneke Parrish for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janneke Parrish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janneke Parrish (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cabrils (talk) 23:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to History of Cape Verde, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.
Your edit for which you are receiving this message is 1245843479 & my revert on your edit is 1251348739.
kemel49(connect)(contri) 18:39, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply