Qaqwewew

Hello, Qaqwewew! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Kingturtle (talk) 16:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Blocked for one month - See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qaqwewew

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qaqwewew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was wondering if my block of one month could be reviewed because, I did not read Wikipedia policy which I know is wrong but I had no idea their was rules against more than one account. Also none of these accounts were use to move arguements in my favor. None of the accounts in question were ever used during the same time. After not being able to access and use a account I had made I went back and created another to continue my contribution to Wikipedia. I did not know how to delete previously created accounts so they where still there. I would like to have the block on my ability to edit restored because I have made alot of positive contributions to Wikipedia and I've help get alot of need image on Wikipedia. I also think his block will greatly stop my ability to help on Wikipedia because if I cannot edit I cannot help improve Wikipedia articles and images. I hope you see this and I will make sure to read Wikipedia's policy and continue to positively contribute to Wikipedia. The only accounts listed on that page that belong to me are the ones you have confirmed, the rest are just speculation. Like I said above none of the accounts above have been used during the same time the accounts were created I when I could not access the others and I was not using them to help me in arguements in anyway.

Decline reason:

Declined for removing my question related to this request. Your assertion that none but the confirmed accounts are yours is also, I believe, a lie. The others' edits are too similar to yours.  Sandstein  06:35, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Comment: I'm pretty familiar with this editor's contributions, and I don't believe that the editor was acting maliciously. If User:Jbarta (who started the sockpuppet investigation) brings up abusive use of multiple accounts, then the block should stand (though perhaps reduced as the editor claims to have not been aware of sockpuppet policy), but otherwise this seems to have been a victimless crime. Furthermore, the similarity in usernames of the most active accounts (User:Qaqwewew and User:Zxcvxxcxcx) lead me to believe that the editor wasn't trying to be sneaky. -M.Nelson (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
  • PS @Qaqwewew, I suggest that you re-add User:Sandstein's comment to this page that you deleted. Removing another user's comments is heavily frowned upon (see WP:TPO), and Sandstein's comment was completely valid. By not clearly identifying all the accounts you have used, it seems as though you have something to hide. -M.Nelson (talk) 05:40, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Qaqwewew, you may not remove declined unblock request. I have reverted this. Do it again and you will no longer be able to use this talk page.  Sandstein  19:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Block reset

Because of your clear evasion of your block, I have reset your block. It will end exactly 1 month from now. If you evade your block any further, we will have no choice but to make your block indefinite. Regards, –MuZemike 23:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

It seems Qaqwewew may have evaded their block yet again with Ujmikl. I've already filed an investigation. This suspected sock follows the same behaviour as the previous accounts and was spotted again over at WP:GL/P. Fallschirmjäger 12:49, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked

You were warned not to evade your block, but you did anyways. Indefinitely blocked. Please go do something else that is constructive with your time. Regards, –MuZemike 15:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)