Prabhash987

Welcome!

Hello, Prabhash987! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:35, 6 July 2019 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ionnish Patseas (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ionnish Patseas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ionnish Patseas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Prabhash987! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ionnish Patseas (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ionnish Patseas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ionnish Patseas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:This is Image of Indian Actress Nivedita Singh Chandel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:This is Image of Indian Actress Nivedita Singh Chandel.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:15, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:This is Image of Indian Actress Nivedita Singh Chandel.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:This is Image of Indian Actress Nivedita Singh Chandel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Love ke Funday

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:45, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Sock poppet error

Hello Admins

I have been claiming as a sock poppet of User: Aryanshukla87 but i haven't made any account before and also i was editing the same article which the created and was deleted . So what must i do to be free from these cases because i dont want to be a fake criminal. Please help Prabhash987 (talk) 17:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Then can you please explain how it is that you recreated two of their articles and registered just 3 days after they were blocked and deleted? Praxidicae (talk) 17:11, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

While I cannot tell whether you're the same person, it's clear that you're here to pursue the same agenda, namely, promoting the same entities as Aryanshukla87. The evidence is certainly strong enough to conclude that there's a connection between those accounts. Huon (talk) 17:19, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prabhash987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not any sockpoppet of User: Aryanshukla9936 and sir i have not amde any another account to edit. I was asked to make ionnis Patseas but Draft: Nivedita Singh Chandel was my own idea but it matched the blocked user. Otherwise Love ke Funday is also my article and it is not made or edited by that blocksd user. Sir please do unblock me as i will now make sure my new creations or edits don't make any similarities with any blocked account. Thankyou with due respect. Prabhash Prabhash987 (talk) 17:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"I was asked to make ionnis Patseas"; that seems like you are admitting to violating WP:MEAT. As such, I'm declining your unblock request. You are welcome to make a new request but you'll need to specifically and exactly specify who asked you to create this, along with your exact relationship with Aryanshukla9936. Don't claim you don't know that editor, we know you do. Yamla (talk) 17:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

New Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prabhash987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello sir as you said i am again acceptong and explaining my thoughts. The subject of Draft:Ionnis Patseas means the basketball player asked me if his greek Wikipedia page can be translated on English Wikipedia or not so i just planned to try this language link method. And thats all. And where comes to User:Aryanshukla9936. I know him through social media and i started the work when he started but he told me few days ago that his article was rejected and his account was blocked so i saw his profile and i thought Draft: Nivedita Singh Chandel can be made as reliable sources are available but he didn't cited them correctly. Then i was just working on the articles and then i also saw Draft:Nivedita Singh Chandel Has worked in Love ke Funday but that movie was also not there on Wikipedia so in my free time i also created rhat article too. Hope i am able to explain you my situation. Thankyou Prabhash987 (talk) 19:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.
PS:You have basically admitted to MEATpuppetry, coordinating edits off-wiki, and are either a previously blocked editor or editing at their behest or someone esle's 's .   Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prabhash987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello Sir as per i know what wrong things i did that cause me a block like editing all the article of a block user and i must. Also not listen to a block user and i think that the block is now not necessary as i think i understand my mistakes and promise to not try to make any type of relation with any blocked user and edit articles carefully. My mistakes were mentioned in above req and here i am apoplogizing for it and i now understand the issues. Thanking you Prabhash987 (talk) 01:07, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Regardless of any other issues, I don't think your English skills are good enough to edit here. I have trouble understanding what you're trying to say. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:12, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• For the record, you were very likely in the same physical location as the person you were blocked as a sock of, so saying that you know them via social media is also a bit untruthful. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

• I was asked to make it on social media maybe the person be of same area or city as i use my apartments public network. I don't know the person personally much but ya i got the work from him/her. Prabhash987 (talk) 01:46, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prabhash987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was asked to make the project on Wikipedia and yes sir i am sorry for my bad English in last request but i really understand the problems i created on Wikipedia and i promise not to repeat any of them and i will never ever contact or work with User:AryanShukla9936 on Wikipedia. It's really a disappointment for me to be blocked but now i understand i was capable for this because i was going to break many rules. I also will make sure to not touch articles of any blocked user. So now the block is not required as per i understand problems i created like i tried to make relation with a blocked user who did many bad jobs and i also tried to make his/her every article, i will not act like a sockpoppet in future and i will also make only useful. Hanges on Wikipedia. but now i am aware of my mistakes and sir now i request you to unblock me if you think i am apoplogizing for my work Please do unblock me or atleast recover my works Thankyou Prabhash987 (talk) 01:41, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I agree with NinjaRobotPirate's assessment that your written English skills are insufficient for you to be able to contribute constructively to this encyclopedia. I am also withdrawing your ability to make further appeals. MER-C 14:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.