Pkslrrrr

This is Pkslrrrr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Athena Kourtis (August 29)

Latest comment: 20 days ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Athena Kourtis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Pkslrrrr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @SafariScribe!

Thank you for taking the time to review my first article submission. I believe this biography meets all notability criteria, but I tried my best to include a better variety of non-primary sources in this updated submission. If that's not the issue, please let me know so that I can go back in and fix. Much appreciated! Pkslrrrr (talk) 21:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

It should meet WP:NACADEMIC before accepted. Authors profile on sites like scholar google, scoops, e.t.c. isn't necessary, because it doesn't signify how notable, see MOS:EXTERNALLINKS. Also, primary sources are same as above and for that reason, we need less of his/her publications and we require reviews of her own works, coverage in multiple reliable sources, see WP:SIGCOV. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Apologies for the delay! I believe WP:NACADEMIC is met, under the first, second, and third criteria (as a member of the Red Book Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics). In the context of Wikipedia submissions, by "unnecessary", do you mean that I should omit Scopus / Google Scholar metrics? While she is extensively cited, I'm not sure I'm finding much in the way of significant coverage, especially in English sources (there are some in Greek). The latest submission of the biography should have significantly more coverage than the first submission. Are more required to pass review? Once again, this is my first submission, and your feedback is valued and greatly appreciated. Pkslrrrr (talk) 13:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @SafariScribe! Unsure if replying automatically pings, sorry in advance to bother! Pkslrrrr (talk) 07:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I rarely review drafts twice, so I will allow another editor to do that. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much for your response and feedback! Pkslrrrr (talk) 16:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Athena Kourtis (October 16)

Latest comment: 17 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Athena Kourtis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jannatulbaqi (talk) 13:54, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic