PickleG13

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PickleG13. Thank you for your work on Andrew W. Garroni. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. To put this on more solid wp:notability grounds suggest finding 1-2 sources that cover him in depth and adding material derived from them. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Political positions of Andrew Cuomo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Political positions of Andrew Cuomo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political positions of Andrew Cuomo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CGP05 (talk) 02:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:In Defense of Joe Manchin

Hello, PickleG13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:In Defense of Joe Manchin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Kenneth Campbell (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Kenneth Campbell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, PickleG13! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Gary Klesch article

Hello PickleG13,

It’s nice to meet you, my name is Rosalyn and I am an employee of Klesch Group looking to update and clean up the A. Gary Klesch article in line with platform guidelines.

I noticed you are among the more recent editors to have edited the article, thank you for your interest and time! I would like to seek some help on improving the piece, ensuring only well sourced information is used. At present a lot of information cannot be sourced and it is my understanding that this has led to a tag being placed on the article. There are also issues with the tone of voice I would like to help with so that the page can be considered a good article by Wikipedia’s guidelines.

To help with this, I have submitted a refreshed article on the talk page, all my changes are focused on balancing the tone and removing unsourced content.

As an editor with a connection to Gary I do not want to make these changes myself. As an experienced and neutral reviewer I would be very appreciative if you would be so kind to look and share feedback.

Do let me know if this is something you could help with. I’m new to Wiki and so any tips greatly appreciated. Thank you! Rosalyn Rosalyn15 (talk) 12:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)