User talk:PhilKnight/Archive110
Declining unblock
Re Special:Diff/1132800652: also, it's obviously a lie. (Just saying. I don't mean that would have been a good unblock rationale.) Bishonen | tålk 17:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC).
- Hi Bishonen, I do not believe him/her, but even if I did, I still would not unblock. Best, PhilKnight (talk) 18:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
TPA
I would jsut revoke the TPA of 2600:100c:b235:97b6:e908:adbe:ca90:d9de since they aren't gonna use their talk page like they should. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- I will wait for them to abuse the talk page before revoking access. PhilKnight (talk) 16:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Remove TPA
Mind removing the TPA Of 70.73.175.85? They've made it clear that they aren't gonna use it constructively. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Oversighter's Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your assistance at the Oversight Team! SunilNevlaFan✨ 15:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC) |
- Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 15:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, the administrator policy now requires that prior written consent be gained from the Arbitration Committee to mark a block as only appealable to the committee.
- Following a community discussion, consensus has been found to impose the extended-confirmed restriction over the topic areas of Armenia and Azerbaijan and Kurds and Kurdistan.
Technical news
- The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 24 February 2023.
- In December, the contentious topics procedure was adopted which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period. There is a detailed summary of the changes and administrator instructions for the new procedure. The arbitration clerk team are taking suggestions, concerns, and unresolved questions about this new system at their noticeboard.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
- Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
A goat for you!
.jpg)
"Enjoy your goat, for your goat enjoys you." - Confucius
Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 12:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 12:24, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Litawardupdate
I don't think this is an acceptable name either. "Literature Award Update". When the user's previous name was 2023nbcc and editing articles about nbcc literature award finalists? - UtherSRG (talk) 12:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- I did not realise that. I have reblocked. I will leave a note explaining. PhilKnight (talk) 12:16, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I left a note at WP:Username policy for clarification. It took me a moment to mentally parse.... I started with "Lita" then realized I was on a garden path... - UtherSRG (talk) 12:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Revdel reversed
Hi, did you remove the revdel on this edit? Because, it has become visible again. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:36, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Iskandar, yes, on reflection it is not a serious BLP violation, as it is a common allegation made against him. He denies it, of course, and in Wikipedia's voice it should be an allegation, not a fact. But while it is a BLP violation, I do not think it rises to the level of a serious BLP violation which gets revision deleted. PhilKnight (talk) 15:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Can you revoke this user's TPA? Thanks. SunilNevlaFan✨ 19:09, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Done. PhilKnight (talk) 19:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. By the way, I'd like to also thank you for what you do at the Oversight Team. SunilNevlaFan✨ 19:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. Happy to help. PhilKnight (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. By the way, I'd like to also thank you for what you do at the Oversight Team. SunilNevlaFan✨ 19:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F10 (useless non-media files) has been deprecated.
- Following a request for comment, the Portal CSD criteria (P1 (portal subject to CSD as an article) and P2 (underpopulated portal)) have been deprecated.
- A request for comment is open to discuss making the closing instructions for the requested moves process a guideline.
Technical news
- The results of the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey have been posted.
Arbitration
- Remedy 11 ("Request for Comment") of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been rescinded.
- The proposed decision for the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case is expected 7 March 2023.
- A case related to the Holocaust in Poland is expected to be opened soon.
Miscellaneous
- The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
- Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
- The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing
. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
BristolEnthusiast1939
They have at least two other accounts, BristolEnthusiast1940 and BristolGoer92. Might be wise to block those two too. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 20:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- They are already blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 20:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- I noticed that you did the deed right as I hit send. Great minds think alike. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 21:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
Technical news
- Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. (T178356)
- The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
- A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on Special:Contributions. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.
Arbitration
- The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
- A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.
"Canals and Inland Waterways" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Canals and Inland Waterways has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 19 § Canals and Inland Waterways until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
49.224.208.83
You seemed to have blocked this user indefinitely. Was this a mistake? 47.227.95.73 (talk) 21:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Well spotted. I have now reblocked for 48 hours. Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 21:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| Thank you for blocking all of those disruptive IPs and accounts today that I, and some other editors, were dealing with. You truly are a knight to the encyclopedia. ChrisWx (talk - contribs) 18:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 18:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- No problem
ChrisWx (talk - contribs) 20:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- No problem
Thanks for cooling me off.
Thanks for stepping in and dropping the edit war warning on my talk. I was definitely overheating with the reverts. PriusGod (talk) 22:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. PhilKnight (talk) 22:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
Technical news
- Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
Arbitration
- The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.
Miscellaneous
- The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.
Confusion
I saw you declined my unblock request, but I’m more confused now than before. What counts as “disputed content”? The phrase “subgenre of new wave” is the content which I was disputing, and by any standard is a much more tendentious claim than “genre of popular music”. Janglyguitars (talk) 15:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- I am sorry that my decline caused confusion. I have undone my review of the unblock request, to leave the review for another admin. Hope that's okay. PhilKnight (talk) 20:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
- As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
Technical news
- Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
Miscellaneous
- Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to Jimbo Wales.
Pinduoduo article help?
Hi, I’m an employee of Pinduoduo, one of the largest companies in Asia. I posted a proposal to make some updates about the company at Talk:Pinduoduo#Fixing problems with NPOV and PROMOTIONAL language on the Pinduoduo Talk page, but there hasn’t been any discussion so far. I was wondering if you as a member of the Companies WikiProject might be willing to take a look at the proposal? Thanks very much. Snowy2000 (talk) 15:57, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding regarding an issue with which you may have been involved as a blocking admin (notice just in case). Thank you. – 2804:F14:80B6:3101:E4B9:E400:1C03:F0D3 (talk) 09:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Can you block Mitrayasna/Ashkan3de for sockpuppetry (and additional problems)?
Hello Phil,
User:Mitrayasna and User:Ashkan3de appear to be the same person, according to (google translations of) their block on fa.wikipedia (see: [1])
Over a week ago, I put up an ANI[2] about their disruptive editing, including my suspicion of sockpuppetry (as well as plagiarism and a nationalistic agenda, etc.). It has yet to receive any other reaction than the one by Mitrayasna. I think my report of the problems is pretty clear. It may just lack the drama or urgency that has drawn attention to all the other ANI's in the meantime, but I'd appreciate any suggestions for improvement (in case of the undesirable occasion I may think it might be useful to do this again some time).
I decided to ask you to look into the possibility of blocking them, since you seemed a relatively active admin with CheckUse access. So, I hope you wouldn't mind going through the trouble of looking into this. Thanks. Joortje1 (talk) 06:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Joortje1, I can't make sense of the Google Translate, so I am reluctant to block. PhilKnight (talk) 08:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I had some trouble with translation as well, but one time it gave a clear text that said these users were the same. Here's one related diff that I could find:
- [3] There were more for the both of them, but it's hard to retrace them in the long threads.
(edit: here[4] is a section on Ashkan3de with concerns about multiple accounts)
- Maybe it's easier if you have a quick look at the problems and diffs listed in the ANI [5]?
- As per your (deleted) request: here are examples of diffs that demonstrate the multiple times they insisted on a text with clear interpunction problems + an unreliable source (Foltz doesn't cite sources other than a Wikimedia Commons pic) + a misquoted source (partly based on an Iranian newspaper article that he does quote): [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- Note how Ashkan3de uses the exact same problem-riddled text soon after Mitrayasna introduced it [13] Joortje1 (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- They are certainly tag teaming, and the content looks dodgy, but I am not convinced this is block worthy. PhilKnight (talk) 11:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry to keep bothering you and thanks for looking into it, but did you only check the few examples here or also those at the ANI? How about the additional diffs for repeated edit warring, dispute raising, WP:Listen, WP:NOTHERE, plagiarism, and misrepresentation of discussions with other users? And even without that larger context and persistant pattern, aren't the Persian block and the tag teaming alone enough reason to have a look with CheckUser (and possibly to then block them if this proves sockpuppetry)? I don't think it's just me (and some people at the Persian wp) who got very annoyed with them, whose joy in working at the project they spoiled, whose time they have wasted, and it seems likely that they will continue to do this.
- If you don't think this is worth looking into a bit more, could you please advise me what to do next (especially if the ANI keeps getting ignored), if I would still like to see if their time-wasting and harmful behaviour can be stopped? Joortje1 (talk) 14:42, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- They are certainly tag teaming, and the content looks dodgy, but I am not convinced this is block worthy. PhilKnight (talk) 11:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- The tag teaming is suspicious enough to use checkuser, but I did not find a connection. The edit warring is concerning, but not block worthy just yet. The other issues do not rise to the level of applying a block. I am sorry, but there is very little I can do. I suggest dispute resolution. PhilKnight (talk) 15:12, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
IP 2.96.117.64
Hey buddy, hope you're well! Just a heads up, you blocked this IP 2.96.117.64, block is about to expire in a few mins, but looking at his talk page activity in the last 30 mins, possibly may need to extend the block! Tommi1986 let's talk! 16:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks Tommi, I have blocked them for 3 months. PhilKnight (talk) 16:43, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
User talk:86.21.141.129
Hi, given User talk:86.21.141.129 you might be interested in Special:Contributions/Asvinth_ambihaipahan. All the best, DuncanHill (talk) 17:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Duncan, I have blocked the account. Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 17:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
2.96.117.64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Can you revoke TPA if possible? They aren't gonna stop their disruption anytime soon, AFAIK. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 15:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Done. PhilKnight (talk) 16:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
User talk:198.252.153.28
198.252.153.28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) probably needs TPA revoked based on their recent edits. Thanks. Skynxnex (talk) 06:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Done. PhilKnight (talk) 06:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Another Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur sock
Hi PhilKnight. As you took care of the last one, could you have a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur if you have any time? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 18:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Blocked and tagged. PhilKnight (talk) 18:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)