User talk:Pencefn/Archive09Q1

The Archive of my Talk Page during Janaury, February and March 2009.
Archive Index

Archives

Archives

Archive Index

July, August, September 2006 October, November, December 2006 January, February, March 2007 April, May, June 2007 July, August, September 2007 October, November, December 2007 January, February, March 2008 April, May, June 2008 July, August, September 2008 October, November, December 2008 January, February, March 2009 April 2009 to January 2010 February to December 2010 January to December 2011 January to December 2012 January to December 2013

Smile!

Hello Pencefn, Filper01 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

- This user appears to be Fila/Farlack etc. –Signalhead ^< T > 14:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Edinburgh and Glasgow Railway

Please take a look at my correction. If I've got this wrong and there did used to be a triangle at Dalmeny North Junction, feel free to revert it. –Signalhead ^< T > 21:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Curse of RAILSCOT, checked against Jowett and concur with your correction. --Stewart ^{(talk | edits)} 21:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Naming suggestion request

File:Sameboat temp001.svg

File:Sameboat temp002.svg

How would you name these 2 icons? They're created for joining the UW set. Certainly do not involved any non-English letters. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 02:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Bala Junction

With respect, I believe you are confusing the {{Historical Rail Start}} and {{Disused Rail Start}} templates. The former only applies to closed stations on open lines, whereas the latter applies to closed stations on closed lines. The issue of the reference to the previous operator is neither here nor there, as there is no rule about what company should be indicated in the routebox; furthermore the information about which company constructed the line is (or should be) contained in the infobox as will be the subsequent operators. Johnstone North is imho wrongly categorised, but as it's north of the border, I'll leave it. Lamberhurst (talk) 16:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

~WHR Updates

Cheers for that Stewart - I had been wary of quoting any date, given how HyL-HH-HyL had changed, but it was the date quoted by Uncle Barrie! - This has obviously changed again in the last few days - and no doubt, may change yet again some time in the next 2 months --Keith 21:17, 19 March 2009 (UTC)