P10n3rr, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi P10n3rr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

edit

xsory i accidetnly worned myself — Preceding unsigned comment added by P10n3rr (talkcontribs) 14:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Valereee. An edit that you recently made to Elizabeth Neumann seemed to be a test. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —valereee (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

User warning levels

edit

Hi, I noticed that you gave a level 1 warning to them when they had already been warned once. It should have been a level 2 warning, since they already had a level -1 template. You might want to look at WP:UWUL. --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

sorrry — Preceding unsigned comment added by P10n3rr (talkcontribs) 13:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

funi

edit

nobody has warned me for my edit on king bach P10n3rr (talk) 14:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Mellk. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

It also seems that you consider making disruptive edits funny? Mellk (talk) 15:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC) no i do not you are just a bad wikipedian who warns people for no reason, also that edit was a day ago. AND it's not really disruptive because it was on the bottom of the page. :) P10n3rr (talk) 13:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you should read WP:VANDALISM carefully because making these silly comments at the bottom of an article (and claiming that you are "just stating a simple fact" in the edit summary) still counts as vandalism, which is disruptive. Not to mention that you made a new section in your talk page after making an edit called "funi" saying "nobody has warned me for my edit on king bach", showing that you are perfectly aware of what you are doing. Continuing with this behaviour will only get you blocked. Mellk (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
now its blatant that the only thing you do is sit on your grandmas chair all day and night undoing wikipedia edits. discussion closed. not replying anymore. and it was only 2 edits. couldve undid it when i did it. its the past, stop worrying about problems and worry about your future, not mine.
also british alert
and because im a nice person, i'm sorry i did that, i understand, plessaes do not block me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by P10n3rr (talkcontribs) 13:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
If you're going to comment on WP talk pages, you need to WP:INDENT your posts, be mindful of WP:NPA (due to the blatant insults you've added here) and you need to WP:SIGN your posts. - wolf 17:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yurila (March 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Yurila

edit

  Hello, P10n3rr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yurila, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023

edit

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ryan Fournier. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. "allegedly, with high faith"?? Drmies (talk) 13:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

testimony pal P10n3rr (talk) 20:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply