OtisSpanner

Tom Mustill moved to draftspace

Please refer to log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:12, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Tom Mustill issues

Hello OtisSpanner. I am happy to provide further explanation about the issues I saw with this article. Before we go too far, could you please clarify whether you have any connections to Mr Mustill or the publishers of his books and films? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 11:05, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi @MrsSnoozyTurtle - thanks for your reply. Yes, I have a connection to the subject, though not a commercial one/one related to any of his publishers/commissioners/etc. I've not been asked/paid to create/edit the page, I just thought that he fitted/fits the criteria of notability and so drafted what I thought was a reasonably impartial page (having looked at other examples elsewhere of similar personalities).

Having done further research around this I see I should have approached this as a COI and perhaps used the Request Edit/suggested pages process instead of trying to draft one myself. Apologies and thanks for flagging the issue.

I'm not sure what the right process is now (whether the whole article would need to be scrapped, or if it can be put to mods somewhere for review/adjustment in due course) but I'll step back from it now in any case to avoid any further issues. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do form my end. OtisSpanner (talk) 09:13, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello. It is great that you have acknowledged a connection, thank you. I see that you have made some good improvements to the article, so hopefully all is not lost. If/when you think it is suitable as a neutrally-written encyclopedia article, you are welcome to hit the Submit button for an independent reviewer to check it and hopefully publish it. All the best, MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Mustill (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tom Mustill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 12:30, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your time in reviewing the Draft page and your feedback @Mattdaviesfsic, much appreciated. I'll review the filmography section and add sources. I'm conscious that IMDB isn't considered reliable for Wikipedia articles, so I'll remove any from this section where reliable sources outside IMDB aren't available. OtisSpanner (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, OtisSpanner! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 12:30, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Mustill has been accepted

Tom Mustill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 23:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)