Juris Doctor

edit

Hello, an editor has expressed a conflict of ideas involving the content of Juris Doctor. On the article's talk page, found here, there is an ongoing discussion regarding the issue and your opinion on the matter is requested. Please do not add or remove content from the article until the discussion there is resolved. Thank you. Useight (talk) 21:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please take notice that there have been comments made about your edits to the J.D. article in the editing history. It is assumed that you haven't noticed those comments, or the discussion page, because you didn't know to look. Please take notice that failure to engage in good faith editing could be considered vandalism, which could result in your account being blocked, or in the page being protected against future edits. I look forward to discussing this matter with you. Zoticogrillo (talk) 01:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Juris Doctor. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Useight (talk) 04:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply