Oerjan
Welcome!
Hello, Oerjan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Nlu (talk) 16:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the fix on the stability condition. I'm going to try to make sure the situation is more overt by casting the conditions in both forms. –Dan Hoey 20:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm a little less sure about changing the definition of stability. The two aren't equivalent without linearity. Are you sure the usual definition of stability assumes that A({c+sn}) = c+A({sn})? –Dan Hoey 22:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's what the discussion at Talk:1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + · · · led me to believe. Without it, the argument discussed there cannot be done without regularity. But as I said, someone should look it up. I did try to change the sequence definition to match your series definition. --Ørjan 23:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
January 2014
editHello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Malbolge may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s and 3 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Clement Ader
editWell I think the more Wikis you can make a fool of yoursef on the better! Seriously, spotting the discrepancy in dates was a good catch & I'm very ashamed of the hash I made in correcting it.TheLongTone (talk) 23:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Memory space (computational resource) listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Memory space (computational resource). Since you had some involvement with the Memory space (computational resource) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Perfectly acceptable
editYour edit summary said, "(Reverting vandalism on absent user's page, hope this is OK)" -- just so you know, this was perfectly acceptable. While editing a user page should be left up to the user, removing vandalism is one of the recognized exceptions to this practice. Happy editing! Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 10:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
We are both differently correct!
editWe each looked at different things, EACH of which are wrong! Go figure!! Fiddle Faddle 00:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hah, so we are! --Ørjan (talk) 00:50, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Solving that one is complex. It cannot be solved by changing the order of the list, nor by a simple explanation, because the mouseover labels come up and confuse the reader. You are 100%% correct with the order of the pictures. I am 100% correct with the order of the labels. Neither of these orders agrees with the list the way it is stated Fiddle Faddle 00:59, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Oerjan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Oerjan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Oerjan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editwinter Ramadan
editOnly in the Northern Hemisphere, of course, have there not been winter Ramadans since 2010 (Not that polar night's been an issue at any permanent mosques south of the equator AFAIK). Daniel Case (talk) 08:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)