User talk:Alexiaya/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Watch List

Rather than make a separate section on everyone's talk page, I'll just ask and tag the others here:

• IJBall
• Geraldo Perez
• MPFitz1968

Since we've all been working collaboratively with each other for quite a while now, for reference, what articles listed in my sandbox that are on my watch list are also on your guys' watch list? Amaury (talk) 02:33, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

For main TV series articles, I've got Austin & Ally; Best Friends Whenever; Bunk'd; Girl Meets World; Henry Danger; I Didn't Do It; Jessie; K.C. Undercover; Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn; Stuck in the Middle; and The Thundermans. Episode list articles: Austin & Ally; Dog with a Blog; Girl Meets World; Henry Danger; I Didn't Do It; Jessie; K.C. Undercover; Liv and Maddie; Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn; and The Thundermans. Character list articles: Girl Meets World.

I just added Backstage. I recall you requested that earlier, Amaury, though I was baffled about recent edits replacing the Canadian air dates, which should be there given that it's a Canadian show. I see it's in need of summaries; not sure how many I can do, but will rewatch and come up with what I can.

I do have a few actors/actresses related to these TV series on my watchlist as well, plus some other TV series. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:32, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: I had most of those, except for Make It Pop, Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn, The Other Kingdom and Paradise Run. I added those now, though. Apparently I had only the episode list for The Thundermans, and was missing that for Henry Danger. And yeah, I watch some actor/actress articles too. nyuszika7h (talk) 11:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: In general, I don't put TV series on my watchlist (my watchlist is still focused more on rail-related topics, and (TV) actor bios; and often I don't need to because the rest of you guys have those handled!). I used to have Paradise Run on my list (after it was listed at AfD, and I helped get it into shape), but I took it off a couple of weeks after the new episodes stopped airing. I have Backstage on my watchlist currently because, up until a few days ago, no one else was watching it. And articles I helped "create" will generally remain on my watch list, so Lab Rats: Elite Force is on my watchlist, and is likely to stay there. However, I usually follow what you guys are up to, so I often see if one of the articles you guys is watching is "under attack" from vandals, etc. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:44, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: Re. Backstage. That's already been resolved on my talk page and I've taken full responsibility for it. That's probably where you saw all that, though. And yes, I was silly. :)

Thanks, guys. Just waiting to hear back from Geraldo now. Also, IJBall, that's an interesting approach, but it still counts, in my opinion, since you have been helping out here and there, especially with those discussions a while ago regarding K.C. Undercover and Best Friends Whenever. Amaury (talk) 13:59, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Geraldo Perez, any input from you? Thanks in advance. :) Amaury (talk) 21:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

I watch most of those, looking mainly for vandalism and unreferenced changes. Stuff that is changed by editors I trust I just check for errors and possible incomplete vandalism reverts. I spend some time repairing vandalism, or marginally competent editors who sometimes go on crusades breaking stuff when I see it, and usually end up putting their pages I fixed in my watch list which is generally how my watchlist expands. I am glad to see more people working on kids shows, for a while it felt kind of lonely. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Paging Nyuszika7H!

Hi Nyuszika7H! Could you please take a look at Houdini and Doyle, so that you might work your (templating) magic to get the episodes table there to display the national airdates in two separate columns? I'd appreciate the assistance! Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

@IJBall:  Done – nyuszika7h (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Dead Disney Press link

Hey, Nyuszika7H – do you have a place to dig up archives of 'dead link' Disney Press releases? The So Random! random article has a ref with this link, but there's no (usable) archive for it at archive.org. Also pinging Geraldo Perez in case he knows an answer as well. TIA. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

@IJBall: The actual URL used is this, that site is defunct and redirects to Disney ABC Press now. I found a copy on Archive.is (which is blocked, but it may be possible to request whitelisting if no other source is available), but it's no use either as the actual content part is blank. nyuszika7h (talk) 16:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

OK, followup question – is there a way to mark a ref with a 'dead link' tag and get Cyberpower's bot to ignore it? --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

@IJBall: You can tag it with {{dead link}}, but I don't know how to make Cyberbot II to ignore it other than leaving the dead archive link there. You should ask on his talk page. – nyuszika7h (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Got our answer: you add a {{cbignore}} template after the ref's {{dead link}} tag. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Template:TV Ratings

Were you aware of this template – {{TV Ratings}}?

Is it salvageable? Or should it just be sent to WP:TfD?... I just thought I'd make you aware of this, and let you make the call as you're more knowledgeable with template stuff than I am! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

@IJBall: It can be deleted, there is already {{Television season ratings}}. nyuszika7h (talk) 19:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

(P.S. You might want to list the templates you've either created, or worked a lot on, on your User page. Personally, I know that would be helpful on my end when I'm looking for a particular TV template as I am right now!... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC))

Kristen Schaal's spouse

Thank you for message about Kristan Schaal. I did not think I needed to source my update on Spouse as it documented in the section on her books "The Sexy Book of Sexy Sex":

"Schaal wrote a book of humor, The Sexy Book of Sexy Sex, with her husband, former Daily Show writer Rich Blomquist. It was published in July 2010 by Chronicle Books"

Thanks Bob Gibson Dover Delaware USA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wa3pxx (talk • contribs) 13:40, 17 May 2016‎

@Wa3pxx: You can use {{cite book}} for that. If it's not clear, just put the name of the book and other info (ISBN strongly recommended) inside <ref>...</ref> directly after the statement. nyuszika7h (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

@Wa3pxx: Oh, I didn't see it was already cited in the article text. In that case it's not strictly necessary to repeat the citation in the infobox. nyuszika7h (talk) 14:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 19 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Brave Bison page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Re: Best Friends Whenever

That was intentional when I went thought it since Copyright Office has the highest authority. Amaury (talk) 18:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: You can revert it then, it's just a bit of pedantry, it looks better if the numbers are in order. :P nyuszika7h (talk) 20:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I can be like that myself. Amaury (talk) 20:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Bizaardvark

Hi! Someone just uploaded the "logo" for the upcoming Disney Channel series Bizaardvark, but it's substandard. You seem to be knowledgeable in this area – could you take a look, and maybe "improve" the current logo (so, for example, it's about as wide as the infobox?). Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:11, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Speedy#Opposed_nominations

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Speedy#Opposed_nominations. – Fayenatic London 11:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Prtyinthusa

We may need to take User:Prtyinthusa to WP:AIV. They seem to be consistently adding unsourced content to a variety of articles. We need to keep an eye on this one. If they continue to do it after the recent warnings from you and me at their Talk page, we should probably go the AIV route... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:45, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quentin Primo

Hi-The notability guidelines stated in Additional criteria, Any biography, No. 1: "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor or has been nominated for one several times." Quintin Primo was named bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Chicago which was a significant honor in 1972 and he served until 1985. Quintin Primo would be notable. Thank you-RFD (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Doctor Who (series 9)#Episode Groupings

I would like to invite you to contribute to a discussion on whether or not "The Girl Who Died" and "The Woman Who Lived" and "Heaven Sent" and "Hell Bent" are two-parters. Over the course of 3 weeks and 2 discussions, only 3 editors including myself have contributed, so it would be a great help if you could take the time to contribute. Fan4Life (talk) 20:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Re: Stuck in the Middle

It looks weird capitalized, but I guess I can live with it... xD That's why I always go by the Chicago Manual of Style, which says prepositions should be lowercase unless at the beginning or end regardless of length. Amaury (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

List of The 7D episodes

Hi, if you have some time, could you split off The 7D episodes from the main page? Thanks. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: I'm going to bed, but I can do it tomorrow. nyuszika7h (talk) 20:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF:  Done – nyuszika7h (talk) 13:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

JGHSMC

I have NO conflict of interest CoI in listing my client's voice credits on the game, Golden Compass. I simply stated his name and the characters he voiced. The neutrality in my additions should be quite obvious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JGHSMC (talk • contribs) 22:20, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

@JGHSMC: The problem is we need reliable sources for it, we can't take your word for it, we need verifiability, not truth. – nyuszika7h (talk) 09:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yolandi Visser. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

@Dodger67: Stop making blind accusations of vandalism, I just copied what she said in the post. nyuszika7h (talk) 11:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

That one just passed through my STiki feed, and I have to say it took me a few minutes to run through things to see that it wasn't vandalism before I marked it "Innocent." I can understand why someone might have reverted it, given the text. With regard to Dodger67 (talk · contribs) maybe WP:AGF? And, maybe change title of the ref to as not to cause this problem in the future? Prof. Mc (talk) 13:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about that reaction, I can see how it would seem like vandalism at first look. It's not really necessary to include that part, I did that because usually the whole thing is included, IIRC {{cite tweet}} instructs users to include the entire contents of the tweet in the |title= parameter, and this is similar. nyuszika7h (talk) 16:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

No worries. I get what you're saying about the |title= parameter, for sure.

		The Minor Barnstar
		Great lookout on that one!Prof. Mc (talk) 17:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Prof. Mc (talk) 17:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Unable to replicate reported bug

I am unable to replicate the bug your reported and disabled the bot over. It could've gotten fixed in the series of updates I made to the code, or it may have been temporary. Do you have other examples, I can try out?—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Sandbox

Just wanted to revive this briefly because I forgot to mention that if you guys want to stay updated on whatever it is I'm looking after to watch out for vandalism or the other usual stuff you guys do, you are more than free to—and you may have already done it—watch my sandbox so that when I add something, you guys can see it on your watch list and add it as well if you so desire and I don't have to "annoy" you with messages. :P

I know you, IJBall, and MPFitz1968 are already watching the article for the new Disney Channel series, Bizaardvark, though I'm not sure about Geraldo Perez. If he's not, I'm sure he will after he sees this. And if I haven't mentioned it before, I'll mention it now that it is such a pleasure to work with all of you. Amaury (talk) 03:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Re: Captioning

Moving this here.

Yeah, that second set of lyrics with "...learn" instead of "...red alert" is a common one. I've never seen the other one, though. As for being right in one episode and then reverting, I think that has to do with them airing episodes out of production order. Since lyrics never change, they could just use a copy-paste or something if there's even such a thing for captioning. Although lyrics did change for the fourth season of Austin & Ally, but I don't think the lyrics themselves changed, there was the addition of Laura's voice. That's technically a change, I guess, but not the lyrics themselves. Amaury (talk) 22:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Talk

My article is not a conflict of interest. My user includes 'Sartorius' because I am a fan of Jacob Sartorius. No Relation Rose Sartorius (talk) 05:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

@Rose Sartorius: OK, you can ignore that message then. nyuszika7h (talk) 07:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Piping redirected links response

Sorry about that. I was correcting the link since both Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde redirect to the Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (character) page since they are the same character. I didn't know you wanted them redirected according to NOTBROKEN section of Wikipedia:Redirect --Rtkat3 (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

@Rtkat3: One of the reasons is that someday they may have their own article, but even if that never happens, it's usually discouraged to bypass these redirects as they are "not broken", as the shortcut says, and it just needlessly complicates the wikicode. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Move page

Thanks for letting me know that I can just move pages, as opposed to creating redirects. I know you deleted your comment, but still. Michael Reed (talk) 21:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

@Michael Reed: That notice was meant for the IP who did the copy-paste move, but yeah, you could have just moved it. It will be sorted out by an admin soon, anyway. nyuszika7h (talk) 21:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Captioning on K.C. Undercover

I stand corrected on my earlier statement. I also noticed the "hustle cool" one when I watched yesterday's new episode. Amaury (talk | contribs) 07:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Template talk:U. S. network show templates: not moved

Hi Nyuszika7H

It appears that the page Template talk:U. S. network show templates is the talk page of the redirect, which simply notes the fact that there was a WP:RfD discussion in the past. The correct talk page for the template itself is already at Template talk:U.S. network show templates, which is where you moved it in February. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 08:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amakuru: Oh, I didn't notice that, thanks for pointing it out. nyuszika7h (talk) 08:26, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: My Sandbox

Thanks to your help a while ago, I've simplified the code on my sandbox as well as merged cells with the same content. Click. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

ANI report

I'd advise you to quietly delete that twitter link and maybe even get it oversighted. Wikipedia is touchy about WP:OUTING these days. Tazerdadog (talk) 10:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Noting that I think you are on the right side of the line, but that line is very blurry to everyone right now...Tazerdadog (talk) 10:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@Tazerdadog: Is this good enough, or should I not mention the username being used elsewhere? nyuszika7h (talk) 10:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

That's almost certainly going to be vague enough to be fine. Again, I think Wikipedia is just really touchy about it these days. Tazerdadog (talk) 11:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: Austin & Ally

Just like there is now a more fluid episode table code, I'm sure there's the same for other tables, such as awards, rather than that ugly hard-coded stuff. Would you be interested in updating those in articles we're watching, like Austin & Ally? It also seems I messed up something after I trimmed the awards table per this discussion. Would you take a look there, too, please? I'll try and play around with it some more, but if I can't get it, you'll need to work your fantastic magic. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: There isn't a template for awards, but that one isn't as bad as the episode or ratings tables, and a template to replace the table may not be that simple to use in that case (like I tried making one for filmographies, but that would have made reordering entries harder). Anyway, the problem was too much rowspan, going past the table (this visual glitch where the border is missing always indicates that). And sure, I can help with fixing/updating articles. nyuszika7h (talk) 08:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I figured that out. -_- And thank you, my friend. Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Note on Legendary Dudas Guest Stars

Just a heads up for when or if you start watching this, because the show is comprised of two mini-episodes, I think is the correct term, of approximately 10 minutes each—pretty much like cartoons such as Rugrats—with the exception of the first episode and possibly some unknown future episodes, they list each mini-episode's guest stars—and co-stars, though they're not important enough to list, of course—in the credits. So if Principal Platt appears in both mini-episodes, he'll be shown twice, for example. However, that would just be a big mess to list actors twice, so what I will be doing for future mini-episodes' guest stars is combining them and basing the order off the first episode. (I've already done that with the second episode.) In my opinion, that's still correct because they are still one episode even though there are two mini-episodes, if that makes sense. As the old saying goes, one set of credits means one episode, regardless of how many production codes or mini-episodes an episode contains. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: Yeah, that makes sense, I think. nyuszika7h (talk) 09:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

thanks , but there is a problem

Thank you so much Nyuszika7H for letting us edit Tafila Technical University page,

but unfortunately after lots of changes i made with my friends , suddenly someone just deleted every thing ,why..!

how can i edit this way..

thank you ,

--Thelaststory99 (talk) 10:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

@Thelaststory99: I'm not an admin, I just noticed that the protection set by an admin has already expired. The changes you made were reverted because of copyright violation. Text from other websites (or books, etc.) cannot be used without permission of the copyright holder, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. The contributions are not lost forever, if you can get permission they can be restored, otherwise you will have to write it in your own words (and don't just change a few words, see WP:PARAPHRASE). – nyuszika7h (talk) 10:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

page: Tafila Technical University, Nyuszika7H ,

because i work in this university and i am an admin on its website , and the info just copied from some sections of the website , how get the permission for ourselves?

and how protect ourselves from others edits ?

thanks in advance :)

--Thelaststory99 (talk) 10:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

@Thelaststory99: If you own the copyright to the text, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. As for protection, it's not so simple – articles are not owned by anyone, but if there's an issue with persistent vandalism, you can request protection at WP:RPP. – nyuszika7h (talk) 10:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

my website copyright

Hello Nyuszika7H ,

page: Tafila Technical University

I went to the link (donating copyright materials to wikipedia) and read lots of details , but I didn't get what exactly should I do yet ,

for example i read this ("One simple way to grant permission to copy material already online is to put that permission explicitly on the site where that material is posted. This is commonly known as a "copyleft" notice. This notice must state that your site (or portions of your site) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) or that it is in the public domain. For text, a good statement of release might read")

does this mean i can make link on my website to that agreement? will this work ?

i just don't want to rephrase the whole articles , the articles just about history of the university , colleges and centers , not a scientific essay ?!

thanks in advance :) --Thelaststory99 (talk) 08:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Thelaststory99: Putting this notice on the website (usually at the bottom, but doesn't matter) should work:

<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License</a>.

– nyuszika7h (talk) 08:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Nyuszika7H , thank you sir here is the link : http://www.ttu.edu.jo/cclicense.html,

and the agreement symbol is now located at the footer of our page : http://www.ttu.edu.jo/index.php/en/ ,

what next step now to edit our page in peace without removing it by any one ? page: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Tafila_Technical_University thanks :) --Thelaststory99 (talk) 09:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thelaststory99 (talk • contribs) 09:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 

@Thelaststory99: As I said earlier, articles here are not owned by anyone. Other editors are just trying to make it verifiable and neutral. Read WP:42 and WP:Five pillars for a short explanation. nyuszika7h (talk) 09:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

nyuszika7h , i know this , maybe u didn't get me , i mean to avoid removing it completely for the reason (copyright to official website) , and not locking the page , so what next step to prove this change ? i posted the link on talk page of the university , thank you . --Thelaststory99 (talk) 09:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Thelaststory99: Oh, okay, sorry. I've restored the previous content on the page now. nyuszika7h (talk) 09:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@nyuszika7h ,thank you so much sir for your very quick help , we appreciate , thanks again --Thelaststory99 (talk) 09:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Pokemon go images

Hi. I left you a message about the userboxes I did few days ago but you did not reply. So if you may see that I upladed images and used it for those userboxes. Now someone is trying to delete them due to copyright things. Are the images ok for it? Because I want to keep them. Typhoon2013 (talk) 19:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Typhoon2013: Sorry, I must have missed your message. I can't see the files in your uploaded files list, perhaps they were already deleted, but unless it's something simple like the Poké Ball image I used, you won't be able to use it in userspace, as you are not allowed to use "fair use" images there, only freely licensed ones. nyuszika7h (talk) 19:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Oh, never mind, I see you've uploaded them to Commons. Yeah, those are probably complex enough to qualify for copyright protection, so you can't use them. nyuszika7h (talk) 20:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

So switch back to the pokeball images? Typhoon2013 (talk) 20:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Typhoon2013: Yeah, that's probably the best you can do. nyuszika7h (talk) 20:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Pokemon Go deletion

I think you have it backwards. If an edit is UNSOURCED, you can be bold and delete. However, from [Wikipedia:Content removal]: when removing a section of an article, it is necessary that it at least be explained, and in some cases, discussed. Unexplained content removal is when the reason for the removal is not obvious, and is open to being promptly reverted.: In this case, the source is unimpeachable: Dun & Bradstreet and your deletion falls into the category of [Wikipedia:I just don't like it]: "Wikipedia is not a business deal. It is an encyclopedia. Well-argued statements beat personal, subjective tastes". So, please discuss before trying to remove this section (you can edit/dispute it all you like, of course).Santamoly (talk) 20:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Santamoly: I didn't delete anything. Sorry, I didn't check what happened in detail, but indeed, there should be some sort of explanation. nyuszika7h (talk) 20:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Series overview

I noticed you created Category:Articles using Template:Series overview with empty start date; I've already created Category:Articles using Template:Series overview with only one row, if you're interested in following it. I found that quite a few violated WP:TVOVERVIEW and found themselves in these categories, so I cleaned them out. There's alerts on my user page that declare if there are articles in the categories. Alex|The|Whovian^? 08:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@AlexTheWhovian: Thanks for telling me about the category. And yeah, I've seen those alerts, they're nice. You can also get notices when articles are added/removed from categories on your watchlist. Under Preferences → Recent changes, untick "Hide categorization of pages". Then it will work for any category you have on your watchlist. nyuszika7h (talk) 08:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Oh, nice. I've never known about that; I'll be sure to set it. Alex|The|Whovian^? 08:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Tafila Technical University copyright

Hi, I notice that you reverted my change. I have just checked the website and the copyright notice is STILL on the website. Can you please check with me, i.e. by coming to my talk page before making an further edits to the page. This is getting ridiculous. Thank-you David.moreno72 13:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@David.moreno72: Sorry, the user asked on the talk page, but yeah, it's probably better to have you take another look at it as well. I didn't see anything except a copyright sign (which does not negate the CC license) and the CC BY-SA license banner, no "All rights reserved" or anything. Can you tell me where you are still seeing something else so that I can tell them to fix it? nyuszika7h (talk) 13:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I just checked and there is still a line that says 'Tafila Technical University © 2016 | Development and design : Ateyah ALbdour'. While the text 'Tafila Technical University © 2016' is present, the copyright remains, even if a CC logo is present. What is needed is the replacement of the copyright notice with 'Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.' But even when the copyright notice is removed, there is still the problem of plagiarism, which is why a revert is not appropriate at this time. Thank-you. David.moreno72 13:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@Davidmoreno72: You seem to misunderstand copyright. The content is still copyrighted even if it's licensed under a free license, this is not the same thing as public domain. (Even if there is no copyright notice at all it's copyrighted under the Berne convention.) It may be useful to place that text there to not rely on solely an image, for accessibility, but it shouldn't be strictly necessary. And it's not exactly plagiarism as the editor who added it is the site's owner, and it's cited in "External links". But I'm not going to continue reverting. nyuszika7h (talk) 13:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@David.moreno72: Pinged wrong username, so trying again. nyuszika7h (talk) 13:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm certainly no expert on copyright. The editor has been trying for some time to get his copying and pasting onto Wikipedia (starting on the 12th of July!!), so much so that they received multiple indefinite blocks for multiple socks. Also, when the page was protected they even created a duplicate of the page (now deleted) !! Personally I don't know why they are so adamant to get it onto Wikipedia anyway. If one wants to find out more detail on the university they can visit it's home page. I also doubt that they have obtained permission from the university management to add a copyleft logo onto the page. The whole mess could have been avoided if they had simply used their own words. Anyway, thanks for your comments. Happy editing. David.moreno72 14:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@David.moreno72: Ah, so it is the same editor. I ended up in this situation because I was patrolling semi-protected edit requests and I rejected a request as unclear. I wasn't aware it's a block-evading user. And good point about the university, I should have thought about that. Even if the user wrote all text on the website, the university may still legally own the copyright to it. nyuszika7h (talk) 14:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

MoS for prequels

In finding https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfNTEf5ZtSc looking for the evil sorceress' name I refreshed myself on the plot and realized that in star wars terms it appears that probably Sofia the First is episodes 4-6 and Elena of Avalor is episodes 1-3. Sofia was first broadcast but being that Elena's trapped in the amulet (grimdark ending known in advanced like w/ Darth Vader) and the amulet exists in the first episode of Sofia the First (handed down for generations, I think they said) it's like a prequel that is aired after.

So is 'followed by' only appropriate for a second series which aired after the first series AND includes events which occur after the first series' events, like Legend of Kora compared to Avatar: The Last Airbender ? Ranze (talk) 12:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ranze: Most likely, yes, I'd say so. And Elena can't really be a successor of Sofia anyway as the latter series is still ongoing. On that topic, unfortunately many people misuse the preceded/followed by parameters for new shows airing in the time slot of a show after it has ended, which is explicitly disallowed by the template documentation. That is not the case here, just thought I'd mention it. nyuszika7h (talk) 12:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

[Postcards from Buster]] might also be a good guide for me to remember, it uses 'related by' and aired after Arthur's start and before Arthur's conclusion (assuming it ever concludes) but I wonder if 'related' is more due to because we know of any clear chronological sequence, as in these events could happen in the middle of Arthur.

Dora the Explorer is listed as ending June 2014 and the pilot of Dora and Friends is listed as having an August 2011 premier yet these have a proceeded/followed relationship. Of course the main televization says August 2014 which is clearly after, and the events are clearly after due to age progression. Gonna tag that pilot anyway I don't see a ref for it. Ranze (talk) 12:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: Stuck in the Middle

First, before I say anything, let me just clarify that I am not mad or upset or getting after you in any way whatsoever or anything. I am simply trying to discuss something. :) I have problems myself determining the tone of an online message and I often misinterpret messages, so I just wanted to say that so your feelings aren't potentially hurt or you don't get mad at me, haha! Normally, I don't really do this, but this case I feel could be different if I didn't mention this.

I remember when you and IJBall got after me for following WP:OVERLINKING much too strictly and had to bring it up twice—or more; I can't rememeber—though I don't think either time was on my talk page. I had actually forgotten about the first time as it was on an article talk page that I'm still watching that I didn't really check again—at that point in time—so I continued being strict with it until it was brought up again and IJBall referred me to WP:RF.

Anyway, I feel that WP:RF could apply nicely here as well and MOS:CT shouldn't be followed that stricly. "Without" looks weird to me capitalized—unless it's the first or last word in the title, of course—and it's why I've always gone by the Chicago Manual of Style which says to lowercase prepositions regardless of length, whether it's on here or on threads I create on my forums. This doesn't follow the Chicago Manual of Style, but I still find it helpful, where it says for prepositions like "up," it depends on if it's being used adjectivally or adverbially or not. For example you’d capitalize the word “up” in a title that read “Squiggly Looked Up a Word” but not in a title that read “Squiggly Walked up the Mountain.”. I think going by the Chigago Manual of Style, you'd just lowercase "up," for example, regardless, but I'm not sure. There might also be some rules there for certain prepositions in regard to them being used adjectivally or adverbially or not. This is also helpful in general for me if I don't know whether a word is a preposition or not.

IJBall, mentioning you as well. What are your thoughts on this? I know you're such a big advocate for WP:RF. See Nyu's edit here at 2:26 AM on Stuck in the Middle to see what we're specifically talking about. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: I don't really mind too much either way, I changed it back in accordance with the MOS because you didn't give an explanation. I don't think it looks that weird personally, though. Also, I don't think the capitalization of a single word really falls under WP:RF as it's not going to affect readers as much as strict applying of WP:OVERLINKING, and we are not using an obscure style that nobody uses. nyuszika7h (talk) 15:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the swift response, pal! I'll wait for IJBall's opinion, but given what you said about not caring either way, would you have any grievances about me changing it back, then? Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: I don't mind, if you want to do that, go ahead, I guess. :P nyuszika7h (talk) 15:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: I won't lie – I prefer more capitalization of words in titles than our MOS allows for. (For example, not capitalizing the word "like" in many of our movie and song titles looks abjectly wrong to me...) So, to me, "Without" looks better capitalized. All that said, I've long given up having any strong opinions about title capitalizations, and so don't have any strong opinions in this particular instance either. [shrug] --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hi Nyuszika7H, thanks for your thanks, heres a kitten

Coolabahapple (talk) 17:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: 100 Things to Do Before High School

I didn't know you could make things not wrap, like for the performed by. May have to do that on the other articles now so the song name is all on one line and the credits are all on the same line on the line below. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Eliza Taylor awards

Well, both MTV Fandom Awards and E! Awards are given during San Diego Comic Con and I don't think that they are non-notable awards. You get the award statuette, so it's a normal award which should be included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vindre (talk • contribs) 08:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

@Vindre: Please discuss this on the article's talk page. One of them doesn't even have an article, the other has a very short stub, and I don't think we really need to list all those awards on her page just for the Lexarke ship. nyuszika7h (talk) 09:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

File mover rights

Nyuszika7H – how many files have you requested renames on? If it's approx. 6 or more, I think you may want to request File mover rights at WP:PERM. I think you would qualify, and it might be useful to the rest of us in this section of WP:TV if we knew an editor with File mover rights... Something to think about! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

@IJBall: It seems like I have only requested renames for 2 files here (and 3 on Commons). Unless I happened to manually request renames without Twinkle and not using "Rename" in the edit summary. nyuszika7h (talk) 09:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

OK. When you get a few more rename requests under your belt, I'd definitely advise considering requesting File mover. FWIW... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --HamedH94 (talk) 15:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

I love changes!

I missed the premiere of Gamer's Guide's second season yesterday, and it doesn't look like the first episode is repeating anytime soon. (For a moment I also thought I missed a new episode of Kirby Buckets, but thankfully there wasn't one this week.) So when I do record next week's new episode of Gamer's Guide and possibly new episodes after that depending on when the first episode repeats, I'll have to wait to watch it until I've recorded the first episode as I like to watch things, at least the first time, in airing order.

I wish Disney XD would make up its mind. They go from Mondays to Wednesdays to Mondays to Wednesdays... Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: Yeah, that also happens to me with shows that air here and it's annoying. Sometimes my set-top box for satellite TV just "forgets" to record scheduled things (protip: never buy anything from Sagem/Sagemcom, though in this case it was given by the provider). I do forget to schedule it in the first place sometimes, though a blogger usually posts monthly schedules for kids' channels (Disney, Nick, etc.) almost a month in advance here, so that's helpful.

For U.S. shows I don't have this problem since I don't live there and most things get TV, Watch Disney and iTunes rips posted quickly, so I just download the episodes because I'm not waiting forever for a dubbed version, I prefer watching in original language anyway, at least for English shows (and anime, and even that usually with English subtitles because they tend to be better than Hungarian ones).

Speaking of Gamer's Guide, I'm behind on that right now as the last one I've seen is episode 17 (I was watching other shows). nyuszika7h (talk) 18:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Better get caught up, foo'! Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: Also, the episode should be available on Watch Disney, you should be able to just sign in with your cable provider since you're in the U.S., unless there's something more to it that I don't know of. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I know you can do that, but I'm not exactly sure how it works, either. "Does it cost anything?" and "What do you sign in with?" are two questions, for example. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: It's free, but you need to sign in with your cable provider account to access some locked content (e.g. most recent episodes). It should offer a list of cable providers when you try to access locked content. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Or satellite provider. :P We've got DirecTV. And I think Nickelodeon does the same thing, but I don't know if they'd still have Max & Shred season two, especially considering it was on Nicktoons, which we don't have on this package. I also never saw the first episode of the first season since it seems they never really advertised the show. It's one of those shows where they don't bother putting it in their lineup for reruns. They only show it once, and that's it. Too bad for anyone who missed it. At least Disney Channel and Disney XD don't do that. Sure, it may sometimes take a while, at least on Disney XD, for a new episode to repeat, but once it does, it's usually shown quite often. I also think Disney handles their shows better. They also have silent cancellations and the like, but from personal experience, not as often as Nickelodeon, and they almost always at least have three seasons. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: Yeah, I said cable because it still seems common in the U.S. and most people talk about that, but here it's becoming less popular, though digital cable TV is still a thing. As you can guess from my earlier message we have satellite here. nyuszika7h (talk) 19:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

A few showings of The Ringer again on August 3. That's not that long of a wait. :) In the meantime, of course they're showing reruns of everything else from the first season, but not the first episode of the second season. Logic! And so I don't forget, I've gone ahead and set my DVR earlier than normal for tomorrow's new episodes of Kirby Buckets, Lab Rats: Elite Force, and Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:24, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

The Outskirts

I suppose you're right, but that editor still shouldn't use IMDB to claim its edits. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Lab Rats: Elite Force

You may need to tweak the viewership data reference I provided for the latest episode (as well as on List of Kirby Buckets episodes for Buckets of Money from season two) as I can't remember if comments eventually disappear or not. Or does what you said in the Viewership Data discussion here also apply to Lab Rats: Elite Force (and Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything) since Disney XD's viewers are lower compared to Nickelodeon and Disney Channel, so they end up not making Showbuzz Daily's list most of the time. Although like I said before, it would be nice if they listed all of the shows in the official list or, at the very least, increased it to the top 200 or 250. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: A Bad Case of the Weasles

If both sources say that, then it might have been me and I subconsciously read it and wrote "weasels." Although I'm pretty sure the sources are the ones with the typographical error as Chrome underlines "weasles" as red. However, we can wait until the episode airs. It might not even be the word we think it is. Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: Backstage (2016 TV series)

I'll leave it up you, but just wanted to mention that what you said wasn't fully accurate: It's redundant to include even the date part of the titles for Showbuzz Daily since it's in the |date= parameter already, so the titles can be made even shorter. The date parameter contains the date Showbuzz Daily published the ratings—for example, using the first episode of Backstage, March 28, 2016—whereas the date they have in their title is the date those shows actually aired—for example, using the first episode of Backstage again, March 25, 2016. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: Oops, I forgot that, thanks for reminding me. nyuszika7h (talk) 20:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Happy to help. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Also, a tip: you can use the {{para}} template, like this: |date=. nyuszika7h (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

My other concern with that edit is that I'm not sure it's right to "truncate" a title like that, even if the date had been "redundant" – I think we should generally use titles like that for refs "as is", even if they contain "redundant" date info. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Re: List of Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything episodes

Please archive episode two's viewers. Thanks! I don't think we need to do anything with episode one's viewers as I already had to find that via the Wayback Machine as the comments were already deleted. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:41, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

And Buckets of Money from List of Kirby Buckets episodes#Season 2 (2015–16)? Thanks. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury:  Done It seems WebCite is not working with Showbuzz Daily lately (although I can't see anything in its robots.txt that would block it), so I told the Wayback Machine to archive it instead. (The easy way is to just type https://web.archive.org/save/url in the address bar.) nyuszika7h (talk) 08:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

For Kirby Buckets the comments were already gone, but I found a copy in the Wayback Machine and added that. nyuszika7h (talk) 08:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Pedro Fernández

Hello, I wonder if you could help me with the user SusanneSC, I have tried to explain, but I see you do not understand what I mean. As you will see in the films in the section of television, Pedro participated in two seasons of The Voice Kids, but the user insists on separating the information and put like two different programs, do not know if I understand. I do not have that computer, so it is very difficult to connect me all the time to be aware of everything.--Philip J Fry Talk 21:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

About the Netflix template

Hi nyuszika7h, I'm sorry about those notifications, that must have been annoying. I'm sure you got a lot of them. My bad. I promise I'll be more careful next time. Thank you for being so kind about it. Gonzalogallard (talk) 16:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

@Gonzalogallard: No problem, I only got two of them so far (and I can always turn those off in my preferences if they get too annoying). nyuszika7h (talk) 16:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

K.C. Undercover: Tightrope of Doom

Just thought you might be interested in knowing that the captioning got those two parts of the lyrics correct in this episode. ;) It had a unique opening sequence as well; also, rather than having the cold opening first as always, the show started straight with the opening sequence. You're going to love it when you get to it! :) Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)