Nuobgu, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Nuobgu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Beyblade Burst, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I created a new page for the episodes because of their next season coming up soon. Thank you though for the helpful tip .Nuobgu (talk) 00:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tamina Snuka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naomi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm TheFarix. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Boruto: Naruto Next Generations, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 20:14, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Episode Titles

edit

Hello. I don't know why you keep hiding the episode titles, but there are a few things you need to know concerning episode lists. First of all, Wikipedia does not have an anti-spoiler policy (see WP:Spoiler), so future episodes and even spoiler information of any sort can be posted freely on the appropriate articles without any disclaimers. People who read episode or media information here should already expect to find spoiler information. Secondly, it is standard Wikipedia practice to unveil new/future episodes as soon as the episode titles and numbers are known. Future episodes are only hidden if their titles are unknown. Here are only a few examples of this practice: [1], [2], and [3]. This is practice of unveiling future episodes is done on pretty much every single episode listing article I can remember. Lastly, if you are hiding the future episodes just because you don't like it, you can't keep doing this. Nobody owns any of the articles on Wikipedia, as a result, no one can dictate exactly how any of the articles should look. Just please keep this in mind in the future. Thank you. LightandDark2000 (talk) 22:57, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that you told me in one of your edit summaries "wait until airdates [come out]." But the airdates for all of those future episodes named have already been released, so there is no reason why any of them should be hidden. LightandDark2000 (talk) 20:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017

edit
 

Your recent editing history at List of Yu-Gi-Oh! VRAINS episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. LightandDark2000 (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

By the way, please stop hiding the new episode titles. Their airdates are known, and Wikipedia has no policy forbidding spoilers. In addition, you do not WP:OWN the article, so you can't hide or remove something just because you don't like it. LightandDark2000 (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Why do you keep hiding some of the new episodes? There is no reason to do that, and there's no Wikipedia policy mandating that. Do you mind explaining yourself? LightandDark2000 (talk) 21:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Blue Dragon into Blue Dragon (anime). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:48, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Beyblade: Burst

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Beyblade: Burst. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Beyblade Burst. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Beyblade Burst. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 06:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

June 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Toreightyone. I noticed that you recently removed content from Akiba's Trip without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Toreightyone (talk) 23:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Crash Twinsanity, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 04:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copy-paste moves within Wikipedia

edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:51, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve List of Beyblade Burst God episodes

edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Nuobgu, thanks for creating List of Beyblade Burst God episodes!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your source(s).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

As you have continued to edit, yet 3 months later have added no sources, I assume this is WP:OR and have redirected it. Please move it back when it has refs. Boleyn (talk) 20:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve List of Beyblade: Metal Saga characters

edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Nuobgu, thanks for creating List of Beyblade: Metal Saga characters!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your source(s).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Now redirected until it has sources. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

I just want to say thank you for doing s good job updating all the One Piece related lists.★Trekker (talk) 10:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Nuobgu (talk) 19:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Chronos Ruler.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Chronos Ruler.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toei Animation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magic Boy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

Nuobgu, thank you for creating articles, but I need to remind you again that all articles need references, and the WP:BURDEN is on the creator to WP:VERIFY their information with WP:RELIABLESOURCES. Please add sources to your articles including List of Gintama. Porori-hen episodes. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 10:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve List of Gintama. Porori-hen episodes

edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Nuobgu, thanks for creating List of Gintama. Porori-hen episodes!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your source(s).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 15:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve List of Immortal Grand Prix episodes

edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Nuobgu, thanks for creating List of Immortal Grand Prix episodes!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 15:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Now redirected until it has sources which demonstrate notability. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:22, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Nuobgu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ANI Experiences survey

edit

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

National varieties of English

edit

  In a recent edit to the page DmC: Devil May Cry, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand or Ireland, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. – Hounder4 10:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm TheFarix. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Inuyashiki, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. All air dates should be source, but future air dates must always be sourcedFarix (t | c) 12:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve List of Beyblade: Metal Saga characters

edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Nuobgu, thanks for creating List of Beyblade: Metal Saga characters!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 2 concerns.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:25, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Yu-Gi-Oh! VRAINS characters

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Yu-Gi-Oh! VRAINS characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Yu-Gi-Oh!%20VRAINS. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —FormalDude(talk) 03:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Re: Working!!

edit

The reason why I reverted you twice for the character list is largely because the resultant article is almost entirely composed of in-universe information, without anything that would independently give the article its own notability, such as creation/conception or reception. A few references for the voice actors does not satisfy notability, and splitting out an article almost entirely composed of plot information and character bios is not sufficient enough reason to split it from its parent article. If you look at List of Naruto characters (a Featured Article), you can see the addition out-of-universe information on that article which justifies its notability. All articles need to satisfy their own notability, and anything that doesn't is subject to merge or deletion.

In addition, the plot you had added to the main article was copied from MAL, and that is not allowed per WP:COPYVIO, which is why when I reverted the character split, I also had to remove the plot section.-- 04:04, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Warning

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that.

I see that other users have also put up with your lack-of-an-edit-summary reverts, so this is why I'm warning you now. If you're going to revert someone, at least give a reason why. Just because you like your revision, that doesn't mean it's going to stay that way especially if you advocate to include unsourced and contradictory information. MizukaS (talk) 12:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fate/Extra Last Encore

edit

Not really interested in a huge-ass paragraph as to why I'm right. Look at Madoka Magica to see why my version of the article is the correct one. Why place an "Anime" section? The entire article is about the anime.

Yeah, except that show has a lot of episodes so its got a page for them. That's why yours look so better. Nuobgu (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
At this point, only two episodes of the anime have aired. No TV show with only two episodes has its own "Episode list" article. Having said that, the way you've place the content of the article now is pretty good. PanagiotisZois (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Gintama

edit

In Japan episodes become available to watch online on Monday meaning that it is broadcasted on TV the day before which is Sunday. Gamal (talk).

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

edit
WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

edit
WMF Surveys, 01:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit

  Your addition to Devils' Line has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. I've noticed you adding copy-pasted plot summaries to a number of anime articles. No matter where it comes from, this is still a copyright violation and you need to stop. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 05:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

edit
WMF Surveys, 00:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm TheFarix. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, List of One Piece episodes (season 19), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 20:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of One Piece episodes (season 19), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 02:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of One Piece episodes (season 19). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Farix (t | c) 10:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dances with the Dragons. —Farix (t | c) 20:01, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Granblue Fantasy.png

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Granblue Fantasy.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm TheFarix. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Jūshinki Pandora, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 10:17, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to Calamity of a Zombie Girl has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The next time I see you add copyrighted content to an article, I will have to report you, as despite multiple warnings you seem not to have learned your lesson. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 15:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lord of Vermilion, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Snowycats (talk) 06:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Nuobgu. You have new messages at Snowycats's talk page.
Message added 06:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Snowycats (talk) 06:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 17:12, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to this wiki in violation of our copyright policy and copyright law. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuobgu (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I had a long time to think over actions and deeply regret them. After reading over the guidelines, I understand what not to do and wish to return editing again. Nuobgu (talk) 07:30, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:30, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuobgu (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

After reading the guidelines about copyright violation, I understand that I shouldn't have broke them. I honestly just want to edit again. This block has made understand what I should be doing the right way. Nuobgu (talk) 20:48, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please summarize our copyright policy in your own words. Telling us you won't break the policy any more is appreciated, but it doesn't demonstrate you understand it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:00, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:One Piece DVD 19.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:One Piece DVD 19.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:One Piece DVD 18.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:One Piece DVD 18.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Goku Black & Future Zamasu.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Goku Black & Future Zamasu.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Yu-Gi-Oh! VRAINS Logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Yu-Gi-Oh! VRAINS Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of D.I.C.E. episodes for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of D.I.C.E. episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of D.I.C.E. episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dronebogus (talk) 23:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply