Noyder
|
Lysandros tarafından..
editMerhaba Noyder. Sırp sındığı muharebesi ile ilgili yazdığın yorumlar hakkında.. Herşeyden önce ben bir Türk'üm. Akıl sağlığım yerinde olduğu müddetçe de Türk tarihi ve Türk tarihçilerine saygısızlık etmem ya da bu makaleyi batımerkezcilikle (?!) ele almam söz konusu değildir. Çoğunlukla (aslında özenle seçmeye çalıştığım) batı kaynaklarını kullanmamın nedeni, ne yazıkki karşı tarafın Osmanlı kaynaklarını güvenilir bulmayıp pek de kaale almayışıdır. Ben tabiiki böyle düşünmüyorum ama kendilerine aksini kabul ettirebilmek için uzun tartışmalara girecek İngilizce seviyesine sahip değilim. Bu nedenle hatalarını kendi tarihçileriyle göstermeye çalışıyorum. Bu pek de kolay değil, özellikle de Türk/Osmanlı askeri tarihi konulu makaleleler bu kadar tek taraflıyken. N. Jordan'ın yorumu üzerine 'Ok but, are the Turkish sources reliable when they describe Ottoman defeats? Or not reliable for all?' diye aslında ince bir alay ve kinaye içeren bir soru sormam, kendisinin çiğ tarafçılığını eleştirme amacı taşıyordu. Tamamen yanlış anlaşılmışım. Saygılarımla. Lysandros (talk) 15:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Aurez vous la gentillesse de me repondre Noyder? Lysandros (talk) 14:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Yanıtınız için teşekkürler. Görüşlerinize tamamen katlıyorum. Maksadımız bir, yöntemler biraz farklı o kadar. Anladığım kadarıyla tarih ve yabancı dil alanlarında benden çok daha donanımlısınız. Görüşlerinizi daha cesurca yeri geldiğinde sertçe savunmanız gayet doğal, ve bence doğrudur da. Umarım çabalarınız sayesinde daha tarafsız bir Türk tarihi sunabiliriz okura. Yanıtınız için tekrar teşekkür ederim. Saygılarımla. Lysandros (talk) 19:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Treaty of Nissa
editHi, Noyder; Can you take time to look at the discussion page of Treaty of Nissa. Have a good day. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 18:25, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Noyder. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Noyder. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Noyder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)