Noisy Crew

HABLiR??

I have moved Hablir to User:Noisy Crew/sandbox. Do not even think about posting this to the (Article) namespace until you have some external links to show that it exists. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Same goes for Reading Metro. Please stop these fictions. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 21:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

I've declined the speedy deletion tag you placed on High Guard and removed it. The article may have problems, but it doesn't qualify as nonsense under the guidelines for that category. If you still believe it should be deleted, I recommend the prod or "proposed deletion" process. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your note; not a problem. In general, if something is written in reasonably comprehensible English sentences; it doesn't qualify as "nonsense" per se. However, the assertion of something as a fact that is obviously unbelievable or nonsensical, such as "Steve is the world's sexiest man" or "Earth was invaded by monsters from Pluto", qualifies as "vandalism" as a hoax. I hope you find that useful. Accounting4Taste:talk 16:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Noisy Crew, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! SatuSuro 07:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clovis Elfsberg

A tag has been placed on Clovis Elfsberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 12:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

There was actually a claim of importance in this article, but I deleted it as a blatant hoax. No listing at allmusic, zero non-wiki google hits, zero google news hits, zero google scholar hits, and zero google book hits. I'm a bit mystified here -- you make some good edits, but you also have created some inappropriate pages. We really value your good edits, and hope you'll decide to concentrate on those.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)