Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Nincompoopian! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! 🌀Aegeou2🌀← talk 14:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
if you want to contribute in the section, your contribution is welcome. But simply undoing all the work that I did, when you could have done expansion work, there is not a collaborative work. I am willing to dialogue, if the intention is to add instead of undo. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 13:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
@A.WagnerC: What do you mean "your work"? Nobody should claim ownership of any content they produce in Wikipedia. My edit wasn't about "undoing" what you've done, it's about making the prose better and summarizing what sources state as accurately as possible; I don't care about what you've done. Funny that you talk about collaboration yet you hypocritically undo my edits instead of expanding upon them. If collaboration was the only problem, then you could've just expanded what I'd written instead of pestering me on my talk and basically telling me that what you've written was the better version (which it clearly isn't lol) and therefore it should be kept in the article.
Nincompoopian - Your comment here is absolutely unacceptable. Aside from the blatant incivility and personal attacks, I'll note to you that ✍A.WagnerC never used the words "my work" in his/her statement above. He/she simply said that you undid "all the work that I did". I expect you to comply with Wikipedia's policy on civility at all times, and to collaborate with other users in a positive manner with the goal of achieving consensus. This kind of uncivil behavior is not to continue. Thank you - ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)00:10, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago12 comments3 people in discussion
It seems like an article you recently created, Realme phones, is possibly a recreation of an article under another name. The access dates for sources are from before you created you account. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC) -- (please mention me on reply; thanks!)Reply
Well it's "mine" in the sense that I started the list article. As for the access dates, well that was simply my copy-pasta from the Realme article, where the subsection "Smartphones" was too long for the article too hold which was why I created the "Realme phones" standalone list for it. Nincompoopian (talk) 14:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
There is nothing in the edit summary or talkpage, saying that anything was copied or was "copy-pasta" from another article. You can't just steal other peoples work. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
There is nothing in the edit summary or talkpage, saying that anything was copied or was "copy-pasta" from another article. You can't just steal other peoples work. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
OK I may have forgotten to give credit where it's due, but it's absolutely not my intention to steal from anyone. And that draft? Now that's most definitely not mine. Nincompoopian (talk) 15:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Emir of Wikipedia, hi thanks for the pings. I did review it it appears back on 4/1. Since then I must've reviewed another 4-5000 other articles. Since there was no attribution that it had been split, I did not realize that there was another article, Realme. But yes, this is clearly in violation of WP:SPLIT. Personally, I'd move the draft Realme phones back to mainspace, Redirect to the Realme article, and then revert the redirect, providing proper attribution. Then I'd ask for a WP:HISTMERGE of the your draft, Emir of Wikipedia, to the article. Onel5969TT me16:18, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi, i don't think i could find the poster for Dawn of the Dead in higher resolution (the particular version of the poster), but i think the current version is not too bad (or i can say it's good quality). If probably i can find the higher quality in the future, i will replace it really soon.