NicolaArangino

NicolaArangino, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi NicolaArangino! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, NicolaArangino, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was LanguageCert, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nardog (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

LanguageCert

Good morning, No I have no conflicts of interest when it comes to LanguageCert, but I definitely find it difficult, at least sometimes, to write in a quite impartial way, without letting my emotions/feeling/opinions affect the article in any way. For this reason I would be delighted if you, or anybody else here on Wikipedia, could take a look at the article and try to make it a bit more impartial an objective, at least as much as it is possible. Thank you so very much for telling me. Regards. NicolaArangino (talk) 18:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

If you don't mind, what is your relation to LanguageCert? Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

As I've already said, I know LanguageCert since I'm a student in High School and I am pretty much experienced when it comes to ESOL exams, so I have no relation at all with LanguageCert. Hope you will be able to improve the article though. NicolaArangino (talk) 20:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Wikipedia has pretty stringent guidelines about what subjects qualify for standalone articles and which don't: namely, significant coverage from multiple sources that are independent of the subject and have editorial oversight. My search has turned up a name drop or two in press release- or interview-like sources, which are not independent of subject. No amount of editing can change whether a subject qualifies; I suspect someone may come along soon to nominate that article for deletion. That can be disappointing to hear, and understanding Wikipedia's inclusion criteria (somewhat confusingly [mis]named "notability") makes creating new articles one of the most challenging tasks here. If you have any further questions, please feel free to turn the {{help me-helped}} back into {{help me}} or drop by the Teahouse. Take care, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

LanguageCert moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, LanguageCert, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 1292simon (talk) 09:15, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: LanguageCert (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Salimfadhley were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LanguageCert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:LanguageCert, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 08:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arbus, Sardinia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arbus, Sardinia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Deathisaninevitability,soifearitnot-1234 -- Deathisaninevitability,soifearitnot-1234 (talk) 17:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arbus, Sardinia

The article Arbus, Sardinia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Arbus, Sardinia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Deathisaninevitability,soifearitnot-1234 -- Deathisaninevitability,soifearitnot-1234 (talk) 18:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arbus, Sardinia

The article Arbus, Sardinia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Arbus, Sardinia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 10:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: LanguageCert (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LanguageCert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:LanguageCert, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Lafayette Park Historic District/GA1

NicolaArangino, you opened your GA review of this article eight months ago. While you have made progress over the months, it has been slow, and it's over two months since you posted any significant additions to the review.

GA reviews are not supposed to be long, drawn-out affairs lasting months; the time scale is anticipated to be a week or maybe weeks for the longest articles. If you do not think you can complete the review in the next week or so—a review lasting over eight months is unfair to the nominator—I would urge you to agree to allow someone else to finish the review, since you have other major demands on your time that have kept you from Wikipedia. Thank you very much for your consideration. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: Hi. First of all, I absolutely need to apologise immensely for my procrastinating the GA review to such a great extent, but unfortunately, as you are probably aware of, here in Italy graduation sessions by means of a state exam are held between the second part of June and the beginning of July so, for obvious reasons, I have been extremely busy in the last few months and I could not contribute to Wikipedia in any way, and for this reason I apologise immensely once again. In any case, I hereby inform you that I graduated on Thursday this week, so now I am free and I would be perfectly able to proceed with the review myself, if you wish. Otherwise, in case you still wanted to complete it yourself, I would not oppose this decision of yours, since I understand how slow I have so far been with the review itself. In any case, for further reasons why I would tend to support my proceeding with the review itself rather than handing it over to anyone else, please kindly check the comment(s) I left, a couple of weeks ago, in the GA review designated page. Thank you so very much in advance for your understanding.--NicolaArangino (talk) 05:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

NicolaArangino, thank you for your quick response. Congratulations on your graduation earlier this week; you must be very pleased. I am not acquainted with the graduation system in Italy—all I know is that you wrote I will be free starting from the second week of June at the latest, and we are just finishing the third week, but it could well be that our counting of "week" is different. If you plan to proceed with the review in the immediate future, by all means do so. It would be nice to let Daniel Case know that you are doing so, and how long you anticipate the rest of the review to take—you did seem to think it could be done in a week in your response there. Again, if you think the time to completion will be longer than a week or two, I would in that case recommend that you stand aside and allow a new reviewer to be found. (I have no plans to undertake the review myself, but rather to find someone who can do so if you are not able to complete it now yourself.) BlueMoonset (talk) 05:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset:, thanking you very much for your prompt reply, and informing you that I intend to proceed with my review and that I will promptly be getting back to Daniel Case, I hereby want to point out and clarify that my prediction, viz. that I [would] be free starting from the second week of June at the latest, was unfortunately enough disrupted by the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, which unfortunately made the Italian Ministry of Instruction decide to bring forward the staring date of state exam, which resulted in my being unable to work on the GA review for rather obvious reasons (had state exams started later on, I would have been able to work on Wikipedia GA Review and study for the exam itself at the same time, a plan that evidently I have been unable to stick to in such a way). As a whole, I wish that "it could well be that our counting of "week" is different", but that is not the case: on the contrary, it should be borne in mind more often that most Wikipedia contributors are volunteers, and unfortunately, as, I reckon, applies to everyone, there are priorities in life and I believe that a state exam may well be considered to be a priority. Hoping that I have hereby been clear, I thank you once again for your cooperation and, in spite of its being my fault, for putting so much effort in a bid to find another assessor for the GA review.--NicolaArangino (talk) 17:07, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

		The Good Article Barnstar
		To NicolaArangino for his diligence and tenacity during the 290-day GAR of Lafayette Park Historic District. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

How long was it? Well, I had two other articles about historic districts in Albany (Arbor Hill Historic District–Ten Broeck Triangle and South End–Groesbeckville Historic District) nominated and promoted during that time. And a third, about one of Lafayette Park district's contributing properties, the New York Court of Appeals Building is currently under review. Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so very much! It was for sure a diligent and tenacious approach the one I had throughout the review, especially in consideration of the other real-life activities and tasks I had to carry out in the meanwhile. Yes, I absolutely acknowledge the fact that it was a long review indeed, that is for sure, and I apologise immensely for that, but in the end, better late than never, as we say, and I guess that, at the end of the day, good work takes time.--NicolaArangino (talk) 07:05, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Ah and I've also noticed something rather hilarious @Daniel Case:, if you don't mind me pointing that out. Although I know that in any English-speaking country the name "Nicola" is feminine, in Italian and other European languages it is a masculine name even though it ends with an "a", so I'm actually a guy AHAHHAHAH. I took this for granted since in the UK this is a quite well-known fact, probably not as much in the USA I guess.--NicolaArangino (talk) 07:13, 5 August 2021 (UTC) For further info if you're curious, look at Nicola_(name).--NicolaArangino (talk) 07:15, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Duly corrected. Daniel Case (talk) 07:39, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:LanguageCert

Hello, NicolaArangino. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LanguageCert, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Language Cert

The article Language Cert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not suitable for redirection to Language assessment at this capitalisation. Language certification redirects there but Language certificate and Language Certificate are both redlinks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)