Welcome!

Hello, Nguyen Si Phuoc! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

October 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Digital to Digital filters transformations may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • are used to convert an analog [[lowpass]] filter to a [[digital filter]]<ref>Phuoc Si Nguyen, [http://www.ijoart.org/docs/Convert-An-Analog-Low-Pass-Filter-To-A-Digital-Filter-Using-Pascal%E2%80%
  • equations]]. From an analog low pass filter, it is converted to a desired digital filter using the [[Pascal matrix equations]. Figure 1 illustrates the transformation from one digital filter to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:45, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pascal Matrix Equations (November 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

EBY (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Nguyen Si Phuoc, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EBY (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Digital-to-digital filter transformation

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Digital-to-digital filter transformation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This is taken almost wholly from editor's white paper at:http://www.vi-institute.org/assets/1/7/phuocsinguyen_digital2digitalfilter_final.pdf

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EBY (talk) 21:16, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please re-consider my articles Digital to Digital filter transformation and Pascal matrix equations

edit

I have searched on google website for my article Digital to digital filter transformation and I saw my article was marked with "01:16, 12 November 2014 RHawoth (talk| contribs) deleted page Digital-to-digital filter transformation (This is taken almost wholly from editor’s white paper at: http:/www.vi-institute.org/assetd/1/7/phuocsinguyen_digital2digitalfilter_final.pdf)". Firstly, I would like to say, the paper “Design of Digital Filter Using Pascal’s Triangle” is my self-work, I did not copy from anyone. If you said I already submitted my paper in Vibration Institute and then I cannot submit again in Wikipedia, and if your policy does not accept I reposted it from my self-work then I am fine for my article was deleted . But I am not happy and it is a shock as you said “This is taken almost wholly from editor”, because that paper is mine and all the works on that paper are my self-work. You cannot jump to a hurry conclusion and display on a public such as you did on google website. I wrote two articles, “Digital to digital filter transformation” and “Pascal matrix equations”, in Wikipedia and both of them were rejected with the same reason. I am very sure, you could not find on any website, any book, and any article which have the same words like that. That means I did not copy from anyone. I thought, Wikipedia is a popular dictionary therefore I would like to introduce something new from my self-work such as “Pascal matrix equations”, “Inverse Pascal matrix equations”, “Digital to digital filter transformation” so a wider range of readers could have more choices for their references. I’m so sincerely hoping that you would reconsider this problem. I trust in your investigation! Thank you very much for your time and understanding! I’m looking forward to hear from you. NguyenSiPhuoc 13:16, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, it is an encyclopaedia, there's a difference. You cannot use copyrighted information. Even if you own the copyright. You haven't been accused of stealing someone else's work, you've just been told that simply pasting copyright info here is not acceptable. It's a common mistake made by academics to think they can simply copy and paste a piece of work they wrote for a journal or similar publisher into wikipedia.
You can't expect wikipedia volunteers to know you are the author of the other piece and own the copyright, or indeed chase you up over something like this, you need to let us know you are donating your work. Have a look at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials which explains the procedure plus the pros and cons of donation Rankersbo (talk) 10:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Frequency transformations with Pascal matrix equations for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frequency transformations with Pascal matrix equations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frequency transformations with Pascal matrix equations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) may the force be with you 02:56, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply