Carriage house - thanks!

edit

I had carriage house on my short list of articles to write, but I never got around to it. As a carriage house owner I thank you for writing up this style of building. Now when people don't understand when I say I have a carriage house, I can just send them to Wikipedia. :) White 720 00:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Course Article

edit

Hey! I updated my diagram for Course (architecture) based on your description of the course style, so hopefully it's correct. (If it isn't let me know!) Thanks for the tip! - Campanile 12:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Roof construction

edit

calling for tenders... can you take a look at the talk page for Roof and the above article and make comments/suggestions? I'm planning on deleting that part which I have transferred. Amandajm 21:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Systematic Layout Planning

edit

I'm writing an article on SLP and was wondering if you could provide some insight on it. I'm in the early stages for this article and any help would be appreciated. Jjpo0903 19:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Architecture

edit

Hello, I notice you are a fellow sufferer architect.
I wonder if I might trouble you to read this little section on a friend's page about improving the architecture article? I think really what's needed is some input to get a good heading structure, after which I'm fairly confident the article will pretty much write itself - any news, views or opinions? --Joopercoopers (talk) 15:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jooperscoopers: You asked for my thoughts on this. Personally, I think the "seven lamps" is a little esoteric as a framework for a Wikipedia article on architecture. I don't think anyone has ever really improved on Sir Henry Wotton's 1624 paraphrase of Vitruvius: firmness, commodity, and delight. Everything I can think of appropriate to a Wikipedia article would fit in that framework quite well. Newell Post (talk) 03:24, 28 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ah - did you click the link? I was referring to the Architecture article, not my little stub. I'm looking to get a decent comprehensive structure for the top level article (probably something akin to Law, rather than the rather rambling piecemeal structure that currently exists. Early discussion regarding possible topics for inclusion are at user:Joopercoopers/architecture. Regards --Joopercoopers (talk) 11:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. When you recently edited Attic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rafters and Fans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Uss anacapa docked.jpg missing description details

edit
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 05:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


Proposed deletion of Unitarian Universalists of San Mateo, California

edit
 

The article Unitarian Universalists of San Mateo, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, no independent sources for the congregation. The building itself is closer to notability than the congregation, but doesn't meet the bar either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 22:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Spear-closet.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spear-closet.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

You are cordially invited to the SPIE Photonics West edit-a-thon on 02.02.2020

edit
Join us for the SPIE Photonics West edit-a-thon this Sunday, 02.02.2020!
 
I am delighted to invite you to the SPIE Photonics West 2020 edit-a-thon, at Park Central Hotel (Franciscan I, 3rd Level / 50 Third Street / San Francisco, California), on Sunday, February 2, 2020, at 5:00-7:00pm.

Newcomers and experienced Wikimedians are welcome to participate alongside SPIE conference attendees. Admission is free. Training will be provided.

Details and sign-in here

See you soon! All the best, --Rosiestep (talk) 06:59, 31 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Invitation to Local Wikimania Event in San Francisco this Friday

edit

Hi!

Wikimania is happening and hopefully you're enjoying the sessions. While it's fairly last minute, you're warmly invited to participate in the local Wikimania-themed meetup in the Wikimedia Foundation office this Friday (tomorrow!). You will have to register in advance, but we would love to see more people from the WikiSalon community participate! For more information and registration, please check out meta:Wikimania 2022/San Francisco Meetup.

The event will involve hacking, teaching, learning, and celebrating and we'll have snacks. We will have the opportunity to watch live sessions at Wikimania together in the afternoon. The rest of the day we'll have opportunity to participate in the hackathon, and we may have some on-demand workshops/learning sessions.

In case we run out of space, it's first-come-first-serve so let us know soon! Hope to see you there.

(Subscribe/Unsubscribe to this talk page notice here)

On behalf of the Bay Area Wiki Salon team and Bittakea, Effeietsanders