Mustangs6551
Welcome
editYou are invited to join WikiProject Motorcycling
edit
You are invited to join WikiProject Motorcycling. We work together to improve motorcycling related articles. We focus on things like the most popular motorcycling articles, recognizing and improving new articles, historically important motorcycles, and more. Please share your ideas, suggestions, and questions at WikiProject Motorcycling.
|
|||||||||||||
|
Motorcycling Wikiproject
editWelcome to the Motorcycling WikiProject. Hopefully you have a good time, start many new articles and can contribute lots to the existing ones as we need that. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 17:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Disrupting editing
editEditor Mustangs6551 you can not remove reliable sourced content simple because you disagree with it. That is disrupting behavior and you can be blocked for it WP:DE. Can you find a reliable source that says the Ducati Monster is not a muscle bike? If you could which I doubt, you could only include that information for neutral point of view WP:NPOV. Please read the information that has been added to your talk page to help you understand the rules to editing. Cheers -72bikers (talk) 21:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
72bikers I'm reading the rules. Have you not looked at the conversation on the talk page? There is much more content referring to the Monster as a Naked Bike, middle weight, Standard or just Sport Bike. For example: Monster 400 overview. Moving the term latter in the paragraph seems pretty reasonable. I'm not refuting that Monsters have been called that before. I'm saying it's a bad definition for the series of Motorcycles as a whole. Defining all Ducati Monsters from the get go as a Muscle Bike is terribly misleading. It's the equivalent of saying all dinosaurs were meat eaters, no T-rex was but stegosaurus wasn't.Mustangs6551 (talk) 21:10, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Editor Mustangs6551 your disrupting behavior is being brought to the attention of a admin. Your opinions do not outweigh reliable sourced content and you are guilty of the no 3 revert rules that you say you have read and understand. You have no outweighing consensus on the talk page for your action. If you keep up this behavior you are only compounding the consequences . -72bikers (talk) 21:22, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
72bikers who made you king of the Monster page? Seriously man, I've tried communicating with you 3 separate ways. I don't get why you're so opposed to this change being made. But go ahead, hopefully the admin might actually read the arguments being made or work with people instead of just squatting on a page. Mustangs6551 (talk) 21:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
72bikers you are edit warring here AND have reverted the page yourself at least 3 times. I have reached out to you on this talk page, through my edit summaries, on your personal talk page, and the talk page of the article to try and reach consenus per wikipedia policy. You can play nice or I'll go ahead and report you to admins myself. Mustangs6551 (talk) 21:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)