Music man214

September 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wings at the Speed of Sound have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 23:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at From Me to You, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

The release date update I made to the song came from a noted book source. If I was wrong, then the book was wrong. This doesn't require discipline.

Talk:Adolf Hitler

Please note that I have posted the following here.

@Music man214: It's my impression from the AN/I complaint you posted [1] that you recently read Shirer's book (and please note the correct spelling of his name) and, having done so, you have now appointed yourself an expert on the very complex subject of Adolf Hitler, and especially his views on Jews, so much so that you consider yourself worthy of criticizing every editor who has responded to you edit request on this paqe. However, looking through the 80 edits you've made in the 21 months you've had an account, I note that you have not made a single edit to any article about Hitler, Nazism, Fascism, or anti-semitism. In fact, as your account name would imply, the majority of your mainspace edits are to articles about music.

There's nothing wrong with editing about music, and nothing wrong about posting on another subject than the one you had been concentrated on. The point of my comment is this: you need to drop the stick. You do not become an expert on Hitler after reading one book, and it's more than likely that every single editor who has responded to you knows more about Hitler, and his opinions about Jews, than you appear to. You need to stop insulting them, stop complaining that we're some kind of cabal who have taken "control" of this page for nefarious purposes, and stop filing requests for your suggested edit to be added to the article, since that is simply not going to happen.

I am not a Wikpiedia administrator (although at least one of the participants in this discussion is), so I cannot say with certainty that you'll be blocked from editing if you continue what has become disruptive and tendentious editing, but I can tell you this: if you continue posting in this manner on this page, your behavior will be brought to the attention of an administrator (not the ones involved here) or posted on AN/I (which does not deal with content disputes, but does deal with behavioral issues) for consideration of some sort of sanction -- at the very least a trouting. You have been given a considerable amount of leeway because we adhere to the policy of assuming good faith about our editors, and because you are obviously new here, but you've petty much used all of that up with your behavior here. Please consider yourself to be on notice that you must curtail your behavior. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

I have an MBA, I have read about 20 books on history, specifically military biographies, and I do not ridicule, or look down on people, out of ignorance, like you. I read, "The Rise and Fall of The Third Reich", which is something you should admire, and I paid particular attention to all references Hitler made to the jews. I did this because I had a desire to know why they were persecuted. I found that this likely happened due to ignorance, I quoted my sources carefully, including Mein Kampf, and everything was done with extreme professionalism. Please do not attack, ridicule, or threaten me. I did not know that this website was controlled by you, I think it is absurd that this is allowed, and I am convinced that your monopoly over the subject matter, and your attacks on me, are disgraceful. I don't know what your background is, but I think you are too lightweight to do this work. Please grow up.

March 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to White supremacy— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 19:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Here's advance warning for you: you are not going to be allowed to be a disruptive timesink on White supremacy the way you were on Talk:Adolf Hitler. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Time sink, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 02:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Actually consider this a final warning. EvergreenFir (talk) 02:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Shellwood. Thanks for your input. I can't believe I am being screwed by the same weak character that got me in December. I posted some comments that may have been a mistake in placement (ie. Print rather than Talk), and was immediately attacked by her. To compound this matter, a second editor, waiting in the wings, rooked me off with a ban. This one, I think, is out for blood. I was given an indefinite ban by him. I did virtually nothing, and I would like to come back. I am a very useful contributor, and promise to be good for now on.

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:07, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

I have very little to say about this. Your account has been blocked indefinitely. You may appeal this decision by follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks, but I would suggest you to read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not first (entire page, please). Regards, Alex Shih (talk) 07:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I was blocked by two individuals, perhaps for valid reasons, but I don't think so. I added comment to the beginning of the "White Supremacy" wikipedia website because I thought it was worthwhile. I am told that my statements must be linked to verifiable sources. However, I simply united with common sense in the land, and when I suggested that a new chapter be added for opposing views, I was rooked off the internet by a man from Taiwan. I would like to come back, and I promise to be good.